Abstract
This chapter examines the current status of forensic science service expertise and experts (or court experts, forensic practitioners, forensic scientists or forensic reporters). Despite promising initiatives, uniform mandatory minimum standards for forensic science services and personnel are still sadly lacking, even though the expert’s report often forms the basis of pivotal and far-reaching judicial judgements. Our recommendations aim to improve (the objective assessment and monitoring of) forensic science service expertise at both a national and international level. The forensic science service field in the European Union is in dire need of the following growth model: a specific forensic accreditation standard (CEN/ISO) for laboratories, a European Forensic Science Committee dedicated to the improvement and monitoring of forensic science services, setting objective and specific professional requirements of competence per field of expertise, creating an international pool of trained assessors, as well as uniform evidence-based guidelines, proficiency tests per field of expertise and a certification scheme for (sole) practitioners.
Michel Smithuis is the director, and Esther van Ruth a senior policy adviser, of the Nederlands Register Gerechtelijk Deskundigen (Netherlands Register of Courts Experts, see https://english.nrgd.nl/). All weblinks accessed 21 July 2017.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, M., den Boer, M., Cullen, P., Gilmore, W., Raab, C. D., & Walker, N. (1995). Policing the European Union: Theory, law and practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
Australian Standard. (2012). Forensic analysis: Recognition, recording, recovery, transport and storage of material. Sydney: Standards Australia Limited.
BT Technical Committee Management Group. (2012). Resolutions taken at the 45th BT/TCMG meeting. Brussels.
Chartered Society of Forensic Sciences. (2016). www.csofs.org. Accessed 21 July 2017.
Council and Commission Action Plan 2005/C 198/01. (2005). Council and Commission action plan implementing The Hague programme on strengthening freedom, security and justice in the European Union. www.eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52005XG0812(01). Accessed 21 July 2017.
Council Framework Decision 2008/978/JHA. (2008). On the European evidence warrant for the purpose of obtaining objects, documents and data for use in proceedings in criminal matters.www.eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/RO/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32008F0978&qid=1472054782375. Accessed 21 July 2017.
Council Framework Decision 2009/905/JHA. (2009). Accreditation of forensic service providers carrying out laboratory activities. www.eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32009F0905. Accessed 21 July 2017.
Council of the European Union. (2011). Council conclusions on the vision for European forensic science 2020 including the creation of a European forensic science area and the development of forensic science infrastructure in Europe. 3135th Justice and Home Affairs Council meeting, Brussels.
European Network of Forensic Science Institutes. (2012). Competence assurance system for forensic science laboratory practitioners. Netherlands.
Gatsonis, Constantine. (2009). National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Committee on Identifying the Needs of the Forensic Sciences Community. Strengthening forensic science in the United States: A path forward. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.
House of Commons. (2013). Science and Technology Committee: Forensic science. Second report of session 2013–14 (Vol. 1). London: The Stationery Office.
International Organization for Standardization. (2005). International standard ISO/IEC 17025 – General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. Geneva.
Jobling, M. A., & Gill, P. (2004). Encoded evidence: DNA in forensic analysis. Nature Review Genetics, 5, 739–751. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1455.
Leo, R. A. (2008). Police interrogation and American justice. London: Harvard University Press.
Netherlands Register of Court Experts (NRGD). (2010). Expert in Criminal Cases Act. https://english.nrgd.nl/about-the-nrgd/. Accessed 21 July 2017.
Nicholson, R. A., & Norwood, S. (2000). The quality of forensic psychological assessments, reports, and testimony: Acknowledging the gap between promise and practice. Law and Human Behaviour, 24(1), 9–44.
(Skills for Justice). 2016. www.sfjuk.com. Accessed 21 July 2017.
Smithuis, M. M. A., van Ruth, E. M., & Wieles, E. (2012). Quality control of forensic experts: The complementary role of accreditation and certification. Expertise & Recht, 220–223.
The European Parliament and The Council of the European Union. (2008). Regulation (EC) no 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 setting out the requirements for accreditation and market surveillance relating to the marketing of products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 339/93.www.eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1472055119090&uri=CELEX:32008R0765. Accessed 21 July 2017.
The Law Commission. (2011). Expert evidence in criminal proceedings in England and Wales (Vol. 325). London: The Stationary Office.
United Kingdom Accreditation Service (UKAS). (2013). Accreditation of bodies carrying out scene of crime examination (Vol. 1). Middlesex: UKAS.
United Kingdom Government. (2013). Forensic Science Regulator. https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/forensic-science-regulator. Accessed 21 July 2017.
United Kingdom Home Office. (2011). Codes of practice and conduct for forensic science providers and practitioners in the criminal justice system. Forensic Science Regulator.https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/forensic-science-providers-codes-of-practice-and-conduct. Accessed 21 July 2017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van Ruth, E.M., Smithuis, M.M.A. (2019). On Forensic Science Expertise. In: Patrick, P.L., Schmid, M.S., Zwaan, K. (eds) Language Analysis for the Determination of Origin. Language Policy, vol 16. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79003-9_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79003-9_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-79001-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-79003-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)