Priorities in the Teaching of Ethics in a Globalized World

Chapter
Part of the Advancing Global Bioethics book series (AGBIO, volume 10)

Abstract

Globalization has created the favorable conditions for social, economic and cultural integration in today’s world; but also problems and challenges involving ethics and bioethics. In this context, beside the many benefits of global range, several challenges have emerged, requiring a specific reflection. These challenges involve general disciplines such as anthropology, medicine/healthcare, and ecology as well as specific aspects: in a broad range, those linked to social justice fulfillment, guaranteeing safety, promoting interreligious dialogue, building peace; in a narrow range, those related to professional moral conduct, healthcare delivery, access to healthcare and equitable distribution of healthcare resources, and provision of treatment.

Therefore, new priorities arise also in the teaching of ethics and bioethics in a globalized world.

“Global conscience”: first of all; we have the necessity of providing moral knowledge, skills and attitudes, developing consciences to have a new ethical awareness, enabling first to recognize and then to face the challenge posed by the globalized world.

“Universal values”: second; we must spread universal values, particularly anthropological values such as human dignity (i.e. referring to those documents that have a certain consensus, such as the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, UNESCO, Universal declaration on bioethics and human rights. Retrieved from: http://portal.unesco.org, 2005).

“Common responsibility”: third; rethink and propose again responsibility in seeking a sustainable and integral development. Common (or global) responsibility must take into account both promotion of human beings’ dignity and preservation of creation, showing how all these aspects are absolutely interconnected (integral ecology).

References

  1. Callahan, D. 2004. Bioethics. In Encyclopedia of Bioethics, ed. S. Post, 3rd ed., 278–287. New York: Macmillan Reference.Google Scholar
  2. Dwyer, G. 2003. Teaching global bioethics. Bioethics 17 (5–6): 432–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Global Forum for Health Research. 2004. Retrieved from: www.globalforumhealth.org.
  4. Gracia, D. 2014. History of global bioethics. In ten Have H. & Gordijn B. (Eds.), Handbook of Global Bioethics, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 19–34.Google Scholar
  5. Hellsten, S.K. 2015. The role of philosophy in global bioethics. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24 (2): 185–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Küng, H. 1987. Theologie im Aufbruch: Eine ökumenische Grundlegung. München/Zürich: Piper.Google Scholar
  7. Kymlicka, W. 2007. The globalization of ethics. In The Globalization of Ethics. Religions and Secular Perspectives, ed. W.M. Sullivan and W. Kymlicka, 1–16. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Macioce, F. 2016. Balancing cultural pluralism and universal bioethical standards: A multiple strategy. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 19 (3): 393–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Morandini, S. 2017. Ecologia integrale tra scienza e teologia. In Laudato sì, ed. H.M. Yanez, 49–68. Roma: Gregorian and Biblical Press.Google Scholar
  10. Nezhmetdinova, F. 2013. Global challenges and globalization of bioethics. Croatian Medical Journal 54 (1): 83–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pegoraro, R., G. Putoto, and E. Wray. 2007. Hospital Based Bioethics. A European Perspective. Padova: Piccin.Google Scholar
  12. Pope Francis. 2015. Encyclical letter “Laudato sì’”. Retrieved from: www.vatican.va.
  13. Pope John Paul II. 1986. Address to Representatives of the Christian Churches and Ecclesial Communities gathered in Assisi for the World day of prayer. Retrieved from: www.vatican.va.
  14. Potter, V.R. 1971. Bioethics: Bridge to the Future. Englewood: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 1988. Global Bioethics. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Ricoeur, P. 2004. Parcours de la reconnaissance: trois études. Paris: Editions Stock.Google Scholar
  17. Schüklenk, U., and B. Bello. 2006. Globalization and health. A developing world perspective on ethical and policy issues. In Globalization and Health. Challenges for Health, Law and Bioethics, ed. B. Bennett and G.F. Tomossy, 13–25. Dordrecht: Springer. Second Vatican Council, Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World Gaudium et Spes. Retrieved from: www.vatican.va.Google Scholar
  18. Sinaci, M. (2016. The possibility of global bioethics in a globalized world. In M. Micle and C. Mesaros (Eds.), Communication Today: An Overview from Online Journalism to Applied Philosophy, trivent Publishing. Available online at: http://trivent-publishing.eu/.Google Scholar
  19. Ten Have, H., ed. 2015. Bioethics Education in a Global Perspective. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. ———. 2016. Global Bioethics. An Introduction. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Ten Have, H., and B. Gordijn, eds. 2014. Handbook of Global Bioethics. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Turoldo, F. 2007. La globalizzazione della bioetica. Padova: Gregoriana Libreria Editrice.Google Scholar
  23. UNESCO. 2005. Universal declaration on bioethics and human rights. Retrieved from: http://portal.unesco.org
  24. ———. 2008. Bioethics Core Curriculum. Retrieved from: http://portal.unesco.org

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pontifical Academy for Life, Vatican CityRomeItaly
  2. 2.Fondazione LanzaPaduaItaly

Personalised recommendations