Advertisement

Can an Enterprise System Persuade? The Role of Perceived Effectiveness and Social Influence

  • Jonathan Dabi
  • Isaac Wiafe
  • Agnis Stibe
  • Jamal-Deen Abdulai
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10809)

Abstract

This study provides an interpretation to empirically explain and predict use continuance intention of students towards an enterprise resource planning (ERP) system. A research model based on the information system continuance, the social identity theory, and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology was adopted and analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling. The analysis uncovered important roles that perceived effectiveness and social influence play in explaining the intention of students to continue using the ERP. Further, the model demonstrated how primary task support contributes to perceived effort, which helps in explaining perceived effectiveness of the system. Computer-human dialogue support significantly contributes to perceived credibility, primary task support and perceived social influence. Social identification of the students significantly predicts perceived social influence. Research related to continuous usage of an ERP system is viable, as it enables designers and developers building more persuasive enterprise and socially influencing systems.

Keywords

Persuasive technology Enterprise resource planning system Use continuance Perceived effectiveness Social influence 

References

  1. 1.
    Bhattacherjee, A.: Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model. MIS Q. 25, 351 (2001).  https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Botta-Genoulaz, V., Millet, P.A.: An investigation into the use of ERP systems in the service sector. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 99, 202–221 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPE.2004.12.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Robey, D., Ross, J.W., Boudreau, M.C.: Learning to implement enterprise systems: an exploratory study of the dialectics of change. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 19, 17–46 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Everard, A., Galletta, D.F.: How presentation flaws affect perceived site quality, trust, and intention to purchase from an online store. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 22, 55–95 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Finneran, C.M., Zhang, P.: A person–artefact–task (PAT) model of flow antecedents in computer-mediated environments. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 59, 475–496 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00112-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13, 319–340 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gefen, D., Rigdon, E.E., Straub, D.: Editor’s comments: an update and extension to SEM guidelines for administrative and social science research. MIS Q. 35, 3–14 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hsu, C.-L., Lu, H.-P.: Consumer behavior in online game communities: a motivational factor perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav. 23, 1642–1659 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.09.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hwang, K.O., Ottenbacher, A.J., Green, A.P., Cannon-Diehl, M.R., Richardson, O., Bernstam, E.V., Thomas, E.J.: Social support in an Internet weight loss community. Int. J. Med. Inform. 79, 5–13 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJMEDINF.2009.10.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jin, X.-L., Lee, M.K.O.: Cheung, C.M.K: Predicting continuance in online communities: model development and empirical test. Behav. Inf. Technol. 29, 383–394 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kahn, B.E., Isen, A.M.: The influence of positive affect on variety seeking among safe, enjoyable products. J. Consum. Res. 20, 257–270 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kang, Y.S., Hong, S., Lee, H.: Exploring continued online service usage behavior: the roles of self-image congruity and regret. Comput. Hum. Behav. 25, 111–122 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2008.07.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W., Chervany, N.L.: Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Q. 23, 183 (1999).  https://doi.org/10.2307/249751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tuomas, L., Oinas-Kukkonen, H.: Explaining and predicting perceived effectiveness and use continuance intention of a behaviour change support system for weight loss. Behav. Inf. Technol. 34, 176–189 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Locke, E.A., Latham, G.P.: Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: a 35-year odyssey. Am. Psychol. 57, 705–717 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.57.9.705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nass, C., Moon, Y.: Machines and mindlessness: social responses to computers. J. Soc. Issues 56, 81–103 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Preece, J., Shneiderman, B.: The reader-to-leader framework: motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS Trans. Hum.-Comput. Interact. THCI 1, 13–32 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Al-Natour, S., Benbasat, I.: The adoption and use of IT artifacts: a new interaction-centric model for the study of user artifact relationships. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 10, 661–685 (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shang, S., Seddon, P.B.: A comprehensive framework for classifying the benefits of ERP systems. In: Association for Information Systems AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), vol. 1, pp. 1–11 (2000)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shin, D.-H.: User experience in social commerce: in friends we trust. Behav. Inf. Technol. 32, 52–67 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2012.692167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Spathis, C., Constantinides, S.: The usefulness of ERP systems for effective management. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 103, 677–685 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570310506098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stibe, A.: Towards a framework for socially influencing systems: meta-analysis of four PLS-SEM based studies. In: MacTavish, T., Basapur, S. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2015. LNCS, vol. 9072, pp. 172–183. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20306-5_16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stibe, A., Larson, K.: Persuasive cities for sustainable wellbeing: quantified communities. In: Younas, M., Awan, I., Kryvinska, N., Strauss, C., Thanh, D. (eds.) MobiWIS 2016. LNCS, vol. 9847, pp. 271–282. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44215-0_22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tuunanen, T., Myers, M.D., Harold, C., Cassab, H.: A conceptual framework for consumer information systems development. Pacific Asia J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2, 47–66 (2010)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Uchino, B.N.: Social support and health: a review of physiological processes potentially underlying links to disease outcomes. J. Behav. Med. 29, 377–386 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-006-9056-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y.L., Xu, X.: Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q. 36, 157–178 (2012)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27, 425–478 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Radford UniversityEast-LegonGhana
  2. 2.University of GhanaAccraGhana
  3. 3.Paris ESLSCA Business SchoolParisFrance

Personalised recommendations