Advertisement

Shock Tactics: Perceived Controversy in Molleindustria Persuasive Games

  • Katja Rogers
  • Michael Weber
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10809)

Abstract

Shock tactics in the form of controversial messages are used in advertising to solicit viewer attention and as a persuasive tactic. Persuasive games are becoming increasingly popular, however the use of shock tactics in games have not been explored in much detail. This paper discusses how three Molleindustria games use potentially controversial mechanics and messages for persuasion. In a user study, we explored how the perceived controversy of these games influenced their efficacy. Overall, the results show that perceived controversy correlates significantly with the percentage of their study compensation participants were willing to donate. The findings point towards shock tactics as a potential tool for the design and evaluation of persuasive games.

Keywords

Persuasive games Molleindustria Attitude change Controversy Donation 

References

  1. 1.
    Skorupa, P.: Shocking contents in social and commercial advertising. Creat. Stud. 7(2), 69–81 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Banyte, J., Paskeviciute, K., Rutelione, A.: Features of shocking advertising impact on consumers in commercial and social context. Innov. Mark. 10(2), 35–46 (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Steinemann, S.T., Mekler, E.D., Opwis, K.: Increasing donating behavior through a game for change: the role of interactivity and appreciation. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, pp. 319–329. ACM (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Virvilaite, R., Matuleviciene, M.: The impact of shocking advertising to consumer buying behavior. Econ. Manage. 18(1), 134–141 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Urwin, B., Venter, M.: Shock advertising: not so shocking anymore. An investigation among generation Y. Mediterr. J. Soc. Sci. 5(21), 203 (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pflaumbaum, C.G.: Shock advertising-a sensationalised media construct? Ph.D. thesis, Curtin University (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cockrill, A., Parsonage, I.: Shocking people into action: does it still work? J. Advert. Res. 56(4), 401–413 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dahl, D.W., Frankenberger, K.D., Manchanda, R.V.: Does it pay to shock? reactions to shocking and nonshocking advertising content among university students. J. Advert. Res. 43(3), 268–280 (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Molleindustria: Unmanned. Game, Molleindustria, Pittsburgh (2012). http://www.phonestory.org/game.html
  10. 10.
    Molleindustria: McDonald’s Video Game. Game Molleindustria, Pittsburgh (2006). http://www.mcvideogame.com/
  11. 11.
    Molleindustria: Press listing (2016). http://www.molleindustria.org/blog/press/. Accessed 20 Sept 2016
  12. 12.
    Bogost, I.: Persuasive Games: The Expressive Power of Videogames. MIT Press, Cambridge (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Molleindustria: Phone Story. Game, Molleindustria, Pittsburgh (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bilton, R.: Apple ’failing to protect Chinese factory workers’. BBC News, December 2014. http://www.bbc.com/news/business-30532463. Accessed 20 Sept 2016
  15. 15.
    Ferri, G.: Rhetorics, simulations and games: the ludic and satirical discourse of molleindustria. Int. J. Gaming Comput. Mediat. Simul. (IJGCMS) 5(1), 32–49 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Paperny, D.M., Starn, J.R.: Adolescent pregnancy prevention by health education computer games: computer-assisted instruction of knowledge and attitudes. Pediatrics 83(5), 742–752 (1989)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Harjumaa, M.: A systematic framework for designing and evaluating persuasive systems. In: Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Hasle, P., Harjumaa, M., Segerståhl, K., Øhrstrøm, P. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5033, pp. 164–176. Springer, Heidelberg (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68504-3_15CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Media InformaticsUlm UniversityUlmGermany

Personalised recommendations