The Values of Self-tracking and Persuasive eCoaching According to Employees and Human Resource Advisors for a Workplace Stress Management Application: A Qualitative Study
Self-tracking and automated persuasive eCoaching combined in a smartphone application may enhance stress management among employees at an early stage. For the application to be persuasive and create impact, we need to achieve a fit between the design and end-users’ and important stakeholders’ values. Semi-structured interviews were conducted among 8 employees and 8 human resource advisors to identify values of self-tracking, persuasive eCoaching, and preconditions (e.g., privacy and implementation) for a stress management application, using the value proposition design by Osterwalder et al. Results suggest essential features and functionalities that the application should possess. In general, respondents see potential in combining self-tracking and persuasive eCoaching for stress management via a smartphone application. Future design of the application should mainly focus on gaining awareness about the level of stress and causes of stress. In addition, the application should possess a positive approach besides solely the focus on negative aspects of stress.
KeywordsUser-centred design eHealth Mobile phone Remote sensing technology Stress Physiological Stress Psychological Workplace Health promotion
This study is partly funded by Menzis. Menzis had no involvement in the study’s design, execution, or reporting. We would like to thank all respondents who participated in this study.
- 2.Milczarek, M., Brun, E., Houtman, I., et al.: Expert Forecast on Emerging Psychosocial Risks Related to Occupational Safety and Health. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, Luxembourg (2007)Google Scholar
- 6.Cuijpers, P., Shields-Zeeman, L., Walters, B.H., et al.: Prevention of depression and promotion of resilience – consensus paper. The European Commission (2016)Google Scholar
- 9.Shiffman, S., Stone, A.A., Hufford, M.R.: Ecological momentary assessment. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 4, 1–32 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., Bernarda, G., et al.: Value Proposition Design: How to Create Products and Services Customers Want, 1st edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2014)Google Scholar
- 13.Flick, U.: An Introduction to Qualitative Research, 5th edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2014)Google Scholar
- 16.Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Harjumaa, M.: Persuasive systems design: key issues, process model, and system features. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 24(1), 485–500 (2009)Google Scholar
- 17.Derks, Y.P., Visser, T.D., Bohlmeijer, E.T., et al.: mHealth in Mental Health: how to efficiently and scientifically create an ambulatory biofeedback e-coaching app for patients with borderline personality disorder. Int. J. Hum. Fact. Ergon. 5(1), 61–92 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHFE.2017.088418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Executive HaS: Work with Display Screen Equipment. HSE Books, Sudbury (2003) http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/books/l26.htm. Cited 7 July 2017
- 23.Li, I., Dey, A., Forlizzi, J.: A stage-based model of personal informatics systems. In: Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2010, pp. 557–566. ACM, New York (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753409