Skip to main content

Ocular Imaging

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Handbook of Emergency Ophthalmology
  • 1015 Accesses

Abstract

Several imaging modalities exist for ocular diseases and traumatic injuries. CT orbit is the preferred imaging modality in trauma. CT is insensitive for diagnosing open globe. If the history or physical examination suggests open globe but imaging is negative, the patient may still need surgical exploration due to the poor sensitivity of the test. In cases of suspected IOFB, CT scanning of orbits is the preferred and most sensitive modality. MRI should not be performed unless metallic IOFB has been ruled out. If suspicion for IOFB remains high despite negative CT scanning, MRI or US may be reasonable to evaluate for less common objects such as wood. The majority of medical conditions do not require advanced imaging. When advanced imaging is required, MRI with contrast provides the greatest soft tissue detail; however, CT orbits with contrast are often an acceptable choice. When evaluating for post-septal cellulitis, MRI orbits with contrast and CT orbits with contrast are both adequate imaging choices. Consider MRI in the pediatric population to limit radiation exposure. Physical exam can rule out post-septal cellulitis in many cases; when the diagnosis is unclear, imaging is indicated. The diagnosis of optic neuritis can be made clinically. Atypical presentations may warrant imaging for other possible causes. MRI brain and orbits with contrast can confirm the diagnosis or demonstrate alternative diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kubal WS. Imaging of orbital trauma. Radiographics. 2008;28(6):1729–39. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.286085523.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sung EK, Nadgir RN, Fujita A, et al. Injuries of the globe: what can the radiologist offer? Radiographics. 2014;34(3):764–76. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.343135120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yuan WH, Hsu HC, Cheng HC, et al. CT of globe rupture: analysis and frequency of findings. Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(5):1100–7. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.11010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Joseph DP, Pieramici DJ, Beauchamp NJ. Computed tomography in the diagnosis and prognosis of open-globe injuries. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1899–906.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Arey ML, Mootha VV, Whittemore AR, Chason DP, Blomquist PH. Computed tomography in the diagnosis of occult open-globe injuries. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(8):1448–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.10.051.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bray LC, Griffiths PG. The value of plain radiography in suspected intraocular foreign body. Eye. 1991;5:751–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Saeed a CL, Malone DE, Beatty S. Plain X-ray and computed tomography of the orbit in cases and suspected cases of intraocular foreign body. Eye (Lond). 2008;22(11):1373–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6702876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gor DM, Kirsch CF, Leen J, Turbin R, Von Hagen S, et al. Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177(5):1199–203. doi: 0361–803X/01/1775–1199.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nagae LM, Katowitz WR, Bilaniuk LT, Anninger WV, Pollock AN. Radiological detection of intraorbital wooden foreign bodies. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011;27(9):895–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0b013e31822d3df2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brady SM, McMann MA, Mazzoli RA, Bushley DM, Ainbinder DJ, Carroll RB. The diagnosis and management of orbital blowout fractures: update 2001. Am J Emerg Med. 2001;19(2):147–54. https://doi.org/10.1053/ajem.2001.21315.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wippold II FJ, Cornelius RS, Berger KL, Broderick DF, Davis PC, Douglas AC, Germano IM, Hadley JA, McDermott MW, Mechtler LL, Smirniotopoulos JG, Waxman AD. ACR appropriateness criteria® orbits, vision and visual loss. 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tintinalli JE, Stapczynski JS, Ma OJ, Yealy DM, Meckler GD, Cline DM. Tintinalli’s emergency medicine a comprehensive study guide. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2016. p. 2128.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Howe L, Jones NS. Guidelines for the management of periorbital cellulitis/abscess. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2004;29(6):725–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2273.2004.00889.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. C a LB, Sakai O. Nontraumatic orbital conditions: diagnosis with CT and MR imaging in the emergent setting. Radiographics. 2008;28(6):1741–53. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.286085515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee S, Yen MT. Management of preseptal and orbital cellulitis. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2011;25(1):21–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjopt.2010.10.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rudloe TF, Harper MB, Prabhu SP, Rahbar R, VanderVeen D, Kimia AA. Acute periorbital infections: who needs emergent imaging? Pediatrics. 2010;125(4):e719–26. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-1709.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Starkey CR, Steele RW. Medical management of orbital cellulitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2001;20(10):1002–5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11642617.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Osborne BJ, Volpe NJ. Optic neuritis and risk of MS: differential diagnosis and management. Cleve Clin J Med. 2009;76(3):181–90. https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.76a.07268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee AG, Lin DJ, Kaufman M, Golnik KC, Vaphiades MS, Eggenberger E. Atypical features prompting neuroimaging in acute optic neuropathy in adults. Can J Ophthalmol. 2000;35(6):325–30. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11091914. Accessed 17 Sept 2016.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kupersmith MJ, Alban T, Zeiffer B, Lefton D. Contrast-enhanced MRI in acute optic neuritis: relationship to visual performance. Brain. 2002;125(Pt 4):812–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awf087.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rocca MA, Hickman SJ, Bö L, et al. Imaging the optic nerve in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2005;11(5):537–41. https://doi.org/10.1191/1352458505ms1213oa.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wilhelm H, Schabet M. Diagnostik und Therapie der Optikusneuritis. Dtsch Arztebl. 2015;112:616–26. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2015.0616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Basel, P. (2018). Ocular Imaging. In: Long, B., Koyfman, A. (eds) Handbook of Emergency Ophthalmology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78945-3_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78945-3_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78944-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78945-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics