Skip to main content

Linking Academic Integrity and Ethics Across the Curriculum: Groundwork for Sustainability in Practical and Professional Ethics

  • Chapter

Abstract

The piece argues that there is a connection between academic integrity (AI) and teaching ethics across the curriculum (EAC) that extends beyond shared terminology in a practical and purposeful way, i.e., in a way that is responsive to a challenge in practical and professional ethics. The twofold purpose of the essay is (a) to explain how linking AI and EAC is responsive to this challenge and (b) to make the case for the approach it involves. Two large questions are addressed. The first is about how EAC should be done, if it is connected to AI. The second (two-part) question is (a) What would success look like? and (b) How would we know that it had been achieved—how would it (success) be measured? The first concern receives the lion’s share of attention and involves taking cues from Jonathan Haidt’s social intuitionism and writing about logic and the law by Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., and, in particular, John Dewey. Several considerations that argue for the connection are discussed before the two-part question about success is addressed in the conclusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to Haidt, Graham, Nosek, and Joseph’s moral foundations theory there are five foundations: Harm/care; Fairness/reciprocity (the first two are “individualizing foundations); Ingroup/loyalty; authority/respect; Purity/sanctity (the last three are “binding foundations). The five foundations have been called out in efforts to explain how liberals and conservatives differ. The story that’s told, which is based on four psychological studies, is that liberals more vigorously embrace and employ the first two, harm/care and fairness/reciprocity, than conservatives who embrace and employ all five in a rather even-handed way (2009). Haidt’s discussion of the moral foundations in The Righteous Mind (2012), which is based on further research, is richer in that, for example, it includes a sixth foundation, namely, liberty/oppression, which is grouped with what were earlier called individualizing foundations, and includes an interesting change: fairness is contrasted with cheating rather than reciprocity.

  2. 2.

    Although it is conceivable, it’s not likely that the arguments are equally strong. Here I follow Ronald Dworkin, who makes this point about competing legal arguments (Dworkin 1982, 1986; see Wueste 1999).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel E. Wueste .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wueste, D.E. (2018). Linking Academic Integrity and Ethics Across the Curriculum: Groundwork for Sustainability in Practical and Professional Ethics. In: Englehardt, E.E., Pritchard, M.S. (eds) Ethics Across the Curriculum—Pedagogical Perspectives. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78939-2_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics