Linking Academic Integrity and Ethics Across the Curriculum: Groundwork for Sustainability in Practical and Professional Ethics

  • Daniel E. WuesteEmail author


The piece argues that there is a connection between academic integrity (AI) and teaching ethics across the curriculum (EAC) that extends beyond shared terminology in a practical and purposeful way, i.e., in a way that is responsive to a challenge in practical and professional ethics. The twofold purpose of the essay is (a) to explain how linking AI and EAC is responsive to this challenge and (b) to make the case for the approach it involves. Two large questions are addressed. The first is about how EAC should be done, if it is connected to AI. The second (two-part) question is (a) What would success look like? and (b) How would we know that it had been achieved—how would it (success) be measured? The first concern receives the lion’s share of attention and involves taking cues from Jonathan Haidt’s social intuitionism and writing about logic and the law by Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., and, in particular, John Dewey. Several considerations that argue for the connection are discussed before the two-part question about success is addressed in the conclusion.


Ethics across the curriculum Academic integrity Reasoning Moral judgment Social intuitionism Framing Behavioral ethics Debiasing John dewey Logical method and law Logics of inquiry and exposition 


  1. American University in Cairo. (2010). Academic integrity and its impact on business ethics. In Fostering Academic Integrity Conference, American University in Cairo, Egypt, December 5, 2010. AUC site: Accessed September 25, 2017.
  2. Ariely, D. (2012). Why we lie. The Wall Street Journal. The Saturday Essay, updated May 26, 2012, WSJ Online, Accessed May 28, 2012.Google Scholar
  3. Ariely, D. (2017). Ethical Accessed September 25, 2017.
  4. Bazerman, M., & Gino, F. (2012). Behavioral ethics: Toward a deeper understanding of moral judgment and dishonesty. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 8, 85–104 (Volume publication date December 2012) First published online as a Review in Advance on July 12, 2012. Accessed September 25, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. BNP Statement. (2014). BNP Paribas announces a comprehensive settlement regarding the review of certain USD transactions by US authorities.
  6. Dewey, J. (1924). Logical method and law. Cornell Law Review, 10, 17–27. Accessed September 25, 2017.
  7. Dworkin, R. (1982). ‘Natural’ law revisited. University of Florida Law Review, 34, 165–188.Google Scholar
  8. Dworkin, R. (1986). Law’s Empire. Cambridge: Belknap/Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gillen, D., & Hodge, C. (2014). Business behaving badly. The New York Times. Accessed September 25, 2017.
  10. Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Dædalus (Fall).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haidt, J. (2006). The happiness hypothesis. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  14. Harris, C. (2013). Banks have been fined nearly $3 billion by the SEC and have spent $66 billion on litigation, but one major bank hasn’t paid a dime and expects to pay $0 in litigation this year. International Business Times. Accessed September 25, 2017.
  15. Heath, D., & Heath, C. (2010). Switch: How to change things when change is hard. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
  16. Holmes, O. W., Jr. (1881). The common law. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
  17. Holmes, O. W., Jr. (1897). The path of the law. Harvard Law Review, 10, 457. Accessed September 25, 2017.
  18. Holmes, O. W., Jr. (1920). Collected Legal Papers. New York: Harcourt Brace and Howe (Dewey quotes Holmes at 1924 20).Google Scholar
  19. Hughes, E. C. (1965). Professions. In K. S. Lynn et al. (Eds.), The Professions in America. Daedalus (pp. 1–3). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
  20. Hume, D. (1739). A Treatise of human nature. Accessed September 25, 2017.Google Scholar
  21. International Center for Academic Integrity (ICAI). (2014). Fundamental values. Accessed September 25, 2017.
  22. Kolhatkar, S. (2017). The financial page no more mister nice guy. The New Yorker.Google Scholar
  23. Kretz, L. (2015). Teaching being ethical. Teaching Ethics, 15, 151–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45, 76 (1905) (Holmes, J., dissenting).Google Scholar
  25. Marcus, G. E. (2002). The sentimental citizen: Emotion in democratic politics. State College: Penn State Press.Google Scholar
  26. Marcus, G. (2004). The birth of the mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  27. Mazar, N., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research, XLV, 633–644. (633).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Newsweek. (2010). Do fines ever make corporations change? September 13, 2010, p. 56.Google Scholar
  29. Otten, L. (2010). Does the punishment fit the crime? Accessed 25.
  30. Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. (2009). Hard facts, dangerous half-truths, & total nonsense. Cambridge: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  31. Postema, G. (2011). Legal philosophy in the twentieth century: The common law world a treatise of legal philosophy and general jurisprudence (Vol. 11). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Prentice, R. (2015). Teaching behavioral ethics. Journal of Legal Studies Education (February 2, 2014). Available at SSRN:
  33. Roston, M. (2015). Retracted scientific studies: A growing list. The New York Times, May 28, 2015. Accessed September 25, 2017.
  34. Touryalai, H. (2014). BNP is just fine after $9B penalty. Are billion dollar settlements effective? Forbes. July 1, 2014. Accessed September 25, 2017.
  35. Van Noorden, R. (2011). The trouble with retractions. Nature, 478, 26–28. Accessed September 25, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wueste, D. (1999). The realist’s challenge in professional ethics: Taking some cues from legal philosophy. Professional Ethics, 7, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wueste, D. (2008). Unintended consequences and responsibility. Teaching Ethics, 9, 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wueste, D. (2014). Promoting integrity integritively: Avoiding the scylla and charybdis of abdication and zealotry. Achieving Ethical Excellence Research in Ethical Issues in Organizations, 12, 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wueste, D., & Fishman, T. (2010). The customer isn’t always right: Limitations of “customer service approaches to education, or why higher education is not Burger King. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 6(1), Accessed September 25, 2017.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Clemson UniversityClemsonUSA

Personalised recommendations