Skip to main content

Creativity, Intimate Publics and the Proxemics of Pop Up Poetry Performance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Creativity in Theatre

Part of the book series: Creativity Theory and Action in Education ((CTAE,volume 2))

Abstract

While developing and nurturing creativity is increasingly a centerpiece of economic, cultural and arts policies, notions of what creativity is in an educational sense remain problematic to both policymakers and to the educators who seek to define, measure, and nurture it in their environments. In this chapter we use current research on creativity in education to highlight the ways performance and drama education currently approach the teaching and learning of creativity. We consider a recent relational ‘pop up poetry’ performance that embodies a kind of ‘one-to-one’ applied theatre that draws everyday audience members into relationship with the public poet, and in so doing creates a ‘politics of encounter’ which offers creative, pedagogical and political opportunities for social change. Such methods ask us to reconsider our ideas about the role of creativity in education contexts by claiming public space as a classroom and using performance encounters as creative rehearsal for social change. The ‘intimate publics’ created in such performances engage participants in a person-to-person encounter marked by collaborative learning and creative activism and citizenship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aggelakos, C. (2007). The cross-thematic approach and the ‘new’ curricula of Greek compulsory education: Review of an incompatible relationship. Policy Futures in Education, 5(4), 460–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alter, A. (2017, April 21). American poets, refusing to go gentle, rage against the right. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/21/books/review/american-poets-refusing-to-go-gentle-rageagainst-the-right.html

  • Amabile, T. M. (1982, November). The social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 997–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, R. (1992). Individuality, self-expression & other keys to creativity: Using the 4 conditions of self-esteem in elementary and middle schools. Santa Cruz: ETR Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for “mini-c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(2), 73–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T., & Peters, M. A. (2013). The creative university. In T. Besley & M. A. Peters (Eds.), Re-imagining the creative university for the 21st century, creative education book series (pp. 1–7). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenfeld-Jones, D. S. (2016). Teacher education for the 21st century: Creativity, aesthetics and ethics in preparing teachers for our future. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnard, P. (2011). Creativity, pedagogic partnerships, and the improvisatory space of teaching. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Structure and improvisation in creative teaching (pp. 51–72). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cachia, R., & Ferrari, A. (2010). Creativity in schools: A survey of teachers in Europe. Seville: European Commission – Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannatella, H. (2004). Embedding creativity in teaching and learning. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 38(4), 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. C. (2014). An IPA-embedded model for evaluating creativity curricula. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(1), 59–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union. (2009). Council conclusions of 12 May 2009 on a strategic framework for European cooperation in education and training (ET 2020), Official Journal of the European Union, C 119 of 28.5.2009, 2009. Retrieved from http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:52009XG0528%2801%29: EN:NOT.

  • Craft, A. (2002). Creativity and early years education: A lifewide foundation. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craft, A. (2015). Possibility thinking: From what it is to what it might be. In R. Wegerif, L. Li, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of research on teaching thinking (pp. 153–167). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craft, A., Cremin, T., Burnard, P., Dragovic, T., & Chappell, K. (2013). Possibility thinking: Culminative studies of an evidence-based concept driving creativity? Education 3–13, 41(5), 538–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2012.656671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creative Partnerships UK. (2012). Creative culture & education. Accessed: https://www.creativitycultureeducation.org/research/

  • Creative Scotland. (2013). What is creativity? Scotland’s creative learning plan 2013. Resource document. http://www.creativescotland.com/_data/assets/pdf_file/0019/21394/Scotlands-Creative-Learning-Plan-2013-vd4.pdf

  • Cropley, A. J. (1992). More ways than one: Fostering creativity. Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, A. J. (1997). Fostering creativity in the classroom: General principles. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), The creativity research handbook (pp. 83–114). Cresskill: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diakidoy, I. A. N., & Kanari, E. (1999). Student teachers’ beliefs about creativity. British Educational Research Journal, 25(2), 225–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2010). Unlocking the potential of cultural and creative industries (Green Paper). European Commission: Brussels. Resource document. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52010DC0183. Accessed 30 Mar 2017.

  • European Parliament and the Council. (2006). Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning. Official Journal of the European Union, 2006/962/EC. Resource document. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:394:0010:0018:en:PDF

  • Ewing, R., & Gibson, R. (2015). Creative teaching or teaching creatively? Using creative arts strategies in preservice teacher education. Waikato Journal of Education, 20, 77–91. https://doi.org/10.15663/wje.v20i3.225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallace, R., & Spence, C. (2014). In touch with the future. Oxford: Berg Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, K. (2007). Theatre of urban: Youth and schooling in dangerous times. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, K., Starkman, R., & Rhoades, R. (2017). Performing counter-narratives and mining creative resilience: Using applied theatre to theorize notions of youth resilience. Journal of Youth Studies, 20(2), 216–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garber, M. (2016, Nov 10). Still, poetry will rise. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2016/11/still-poetry-will-rise/507266/

  • Gardner, H. (1988). Creativity: An interdisciplinary perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 1(1), 8–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garner, R. (2007, October 31). Schools ‘must do more for creativity’. The Independent. Retrieved from http://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/schools-must-do-more-to-promote-creativity-5328882.html

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). Distributed creativity: Thinking outside the box of the creative individual. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. Garden City: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallam, E., & Ingold, T. (2007). Creativity and cultural improvisation. Oxford: Berg Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2014). The creative turn: Toward a new aesthetic imaginary. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2015a). Twice upon a place. Applied Theatre Researcher, 3(1), 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2015b, August 19). Art, activism and our creative future. The conversation. Retrieved from http://theconversation.com/art-activism-and-our-creative-future-46185

  • Harris, A. (2016a). Creativity and education. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2016b). Why creativity sucks so bad. NJ: The Journal of Drama Australia, 39(2), 147–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2016c). Creativity, religion and youth cultures. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2017). Creative ecologies: Fostering creativity in secondary schools final report. Resource document. Creative Research Hub. https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/94d25a_734b4a6ddf3749fa86267e7f488fda03.docx?dn=Creative%20Ecologies_Final%20Rpt2017.docx

  • Harris, A., & Ammerman, M. (2016). The changing face of creativity in Australian education. Teaching Education, 27(1), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2015.1077379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A., & Holman Jones, S. (2014). The ethics, aesthetics, and politics of creativity in research. Departures in Critical Qualitative Research, 3(3), 186–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A., & Holman Jones, S. (2016). Writing for performance. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A., & Sinclair, C. (2014). Critical plays: Embodied research for social change. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heathcote, D., & Bolton, G. (1994). Drama for learning: Dorothy Heathcote's mantle of the expert approach to education. Dimensions of drama series. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilmann, G., & Korte, W. B. (2010). The role of creativity and innovation in school curricula in the EU27: A content analysis of curricula documents. Resource document. Seville: European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC61106_TN.pdf

  • Hickey-Moody, A. (2014). Little public spheres. In J. Burdick, J. Sandlin, & M. P. O’Malley (Eds.), Problematizing public pedagogy (pp. 117–129). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, L., & Paris, H. (2014). Performing proximity: Curious intimacies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, M. A. (2016). Drama education and its necessary disruptions. NJ: Drama Australia Journal, 40(2), 141–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leong, S. (2010). Creativity and assessment in Chinese arts education: Perspectives of Hong Kong students. Research Studies in Music Education, 32(1), 75–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machon, J. (2009). (Syn)aesthetics: Redefining visceral performance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MCEECDYA (Ministerial Council for Education, Early Childhood Development and Youth Affairs). (2008). Resource document. Education council secretariat. In The Melbourne declaration on educational goals for young Australians. http://scseec.edu.au/site/DefaultSite/filesystem/documents/Reports%20and%20publications/Publications/National%20goals%20for%20schooling/National_Declaration_on_the_Educational_Goals_for_Young_Australians.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, H. (2009). Theatre and education. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, H. (2015). Applied drama: The gift of theatre (2nd ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, H. (Forthcoming). Performing encounters. In S. Holman Jones (Ed.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of performance studies. Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, C., & Harris, A. (2016). Critical plays: An exploration in truth and verisimilitude. In G. Belliveau & G. Lea (Eds.), Research-based theatre: An artistic methodology (pp. 59–74). Chicago: Intellect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1975). Creativity research in education: Still alive. In I. A. Taylor & J. W. Getzels (Eds.), Perspectives in creativity (pp. 278–296). Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1992). A national climate for creativity and invention. Gifted Child Today Magazine, 15(1), 10–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Eschenbach, J. F., & Noland, R. G. (1981). Changes in student teachers’ perceptions of the creative pupil. Creative Child & Adult Quarterly, 6(3), 169–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, C., Chappell, K., & Craft, A. (2017). A co-creativity theoretical framework to foster and evaluate the presence of wise humanising creativity in virtual learning environments (VLEs). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 228–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, A. Y. (2011). Contexts of creative thinking: A comparison on creative performance of student teachers in Taiwan and the United States. Journal of International and Cross-Cultural Studies, 2(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Harris .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Harris, A., Holman Jones, S. (2018). Creativity, Intimate Publics and the Proxemics of Pop Up Poetry Performance. In: Burgoyne, S. (eds) Creativity in Theatre. Creativity Theory and Action in Education, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78928-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78928-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78927-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78928-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics