Abstract
Improvised scenes work when improvisers listen to their scene partners and agree and add onto each other’s ideas without judgment. These three principles derived from improvisation—listening, agreeing, and not judging—come together to form the improv paradigm, which can be used to modify pedagogy in order to improve student outcomes. Teachers can introduce activities that specifically target how students listen, agree, and judge each other. The principles of the improv paradigm can also be used to reflect on and improve how teachers teach. Colleagues and supervisors can focus on how teachers consciously or unconsciously listen to their students, agree or disagree with their ideas, and judge students’ responses in order to adjust moment-to-moment teacher behavior to create a more creative learning environment. Once improved, these skills lead to more trusting, collaborative, and creative classrooms that foster creative ideation instead of causing students to feel shamed or judged and therefore stop contributing and creating.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beghetto, R. A. (2013). Killing ideas softly?: The promise and perils of creativity in the classroom. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Danielson, C. (2011). The framework for teaching evaluation instrument. Princeton: The Danielson Group.
Danielson, C. (2016, April 8). Charlotte Danielson on rethinking teacher evaluation. Education Week, 35(28), 20–24.
DeMichele, M. (2015). Improv and ink: Increasing individual writing fluency with collaborative improv. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 16(10). Retrieved from http://www.ijea.org/v16n10/.
Drinko, C. (2013). Theatrical improvisation, consciousness, and cognition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ellamil, M., Dobson, C., Beeman, M., & Christoff, K. (2012). Evaluative and generative modes of thought during the creative process. NeuroImage, 59(2), 1783–1794.
Hanh, T. N., & Weare, K. (2017). Happy teachers change the world. Berkley: Parallax Publishing.
Johnson, S. (2002). Emergence: The connected lives of ants, brains, cities, and software. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Johnstone, K. (2011, September). Interkunst workshop. Berlin: English Theatre.
Johnstone, K. (2012). Impro: Improvisation and the theatre. London: Routledge.
Leep, J. (2008). Theatrical improvisation: Short form, long form, and sketch-based improv. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Liu, S., Chow, H. M., Xu, Y., Erkkinen, M. G., Swett, K. E., Eagle, M. W., Rizik-Baer, D. A., & Braun, A. R. (2012). Neural correlates of lyrical improvisation: An fMRI study of freestyle rap. Scientific Reports, 2. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00834.
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Pang, W. (2015). Promoting creativity in the classroom: A generative view. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(2), 122–127.
Phillips Sheesley, A., Pfeffer, M., & Barish, B. (2016). Comedic improv therapy for the treatment of social anxiety disorder. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 11(2), 157–169.
Spolin, V. (1983). Improvisation for the theater: A handbook of teaching and directing techniques. Chicago: Northwestern University Press.
The Hawn Foundation. (2011). The mindUP curriculum: Brain-focused strategies for learning—And living. New York: Scholastic Teaching Resources.
Veenstra, E. W. (2009). Improvisational theater and psychotherapy: A new model. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Azusa: Azusa Pacific University.
White, M. C. (2013, November 10). The real reason new college grads can’t get hired. Time Business. Retrieved from http://business.time.com/2013/11/10/the-real-reason-new-college-grads-cant-get-hired/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Drinko, C.D. (2018). The Improv Paradigm: Three Principles that Spur Creativity in the Classroom. In: Burgoyne, S. (eds) Creativity in Theatre. Creativity Theory and Action in Education, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78928-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78928-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78927-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78928-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)