Advertisement

Therapeutic Justice in Action: Court Process, Reviews and Sanctions

Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter I explore MHCs in action and how the court process influence client experiences. The chapter focuses on court reviews and the sanctioning process. How the court responds to compliance and non-compliance is consequential for clients, having both therapeutic and antitherapeutic effects. I highlight the role of procedural justice and harm reduction frameworks in the working of the court. Throughout the chapter, I detail how MHCs treatment orientation is on display formally before the judge and informally with team members in ways that enhance and impede therapeutic justice.

References

  1. Beach, Lindsey R. 2016. “Unlocking the Black Box of Mental Health Court Case Processing : An Event History Analysis of Extralegal Characteristics & Behavior on Case Revocation.” MA thesis, University of Washington.Google Scholar
  2. Boldt, Richard C. 2009. “A Circumspect Look at Problem-Solving Courts.” In Problem-Solving Courts: Justice for the Twenty-First Century, edited by Paul Higgins and Mitchell B. Mackinem, 13–32. Santa Barbara: Praeger.Google Scholar
  3. Canada, Kelli E., and Amy C. Watson. 2013. “‘Cause Everybody Likes to Be Treated Good’: Perceptions of Procedural Justice Among Mental Health Court Participants.” American Behavioral Scientist 57 (2): 209–30.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212465415.
  4. Chase, Deborah J., and Peggy Fulton Hora. 2000. “The Implications of Therapeutic Jurisprudence for Judical Satisfaction.” Court Review 37: 12–21.Google Scholar
  5. Dollar, Cindy Brooks, and Bradley Ray. 2015. “The Practice of Reintegrative Shaming in Mental Health Court.” Criminal Justice Policy Review 26 (1): 29–44.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403413507275.
  6. Goffman, Erving. 1986. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  7. Griffin, Patricia A., Henry J. Steadman, and John Petrila. 2002. “The Use of Criminal Charges and Sanctions in Mental Health Courts.” Psychiatric Services 53 (10): 1285–89.Google Scholar
  8. Kaiser, Kimberly A., and Kristy Holtfreter. 2016. “An Integrated Theory of Specialized Court Programs: Using Procedural Justice and Therapeutic Jurisprudence to Promote Offender Compliance and Rehabilitation.” Criminal Justice and Behavior 43 (1): 45–62.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815609642.
  9. Kopelovich, Sarah, Philip Yanos, Christina Pratt, and Joshua Koerner. 2013. “Procedural Justice in Mental Health Courts: Judicial Practices, Participant Perceptions, and Outcomes Related to Mental Health Recovery.” International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 36 (2): 113–20. Elsevier Ltd.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.01.004.
  10. Lens, Vicki. 2016. Poor Justice: How the Poor Fare in the Courts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Miller, JoAnn, and Donald C. Johnson. 2009. Problem Solving Courts: A Measure of Justice. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  12. Munetz, Mark R., Christian Ritter, Jennifer L. S. Teller, and Natalie Bonfine. 2014. “Mental Health Court and Assisted Outpatient Treatment: Perceived Coercion, Procedural Justice, and Program Impact.” Psychiatric Services 65 (3): 352–58.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.002642012.
  13. Paik, Leslie. 2011. Discretionary Justice: Looking Inside a Juvenile Drug Court. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Perlin, Michael. 2013. “‘The Judge, He Cast His Robe Aside’: Mental Health Courts, Dignity and Due Process.” Mental Health Law & Policy Journal 3 (1): 1–29.Google Scholar
  15. Poythress, Norman G., John Petrila, Annette McGaha, and Roger Boothroyd. 2002. “Perceived Coercion and Procedural Justice in the Broward Mental Health Court.” International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 25 (5): 517–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2527(01)00110-8.
  16. Ray, Bradley, and Cindy Brooks Dollar. 2013. “Examining Mental Health Court Completion: A Focal Concerns Perspective.” Sociological Quarterly 54 (4): 647–69.  https://doi.org/10.1111/tsq.12032.
  17. Ray, Bradley, and Cindy Brooks Dollar. 2014. “Exploring Stigmatization and Stigma Management in Mental Health Court: Assessing Modified Labeling Theory in a New Context.” Sociological Forum 29 (3): 720–35.  https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12111.
  18. Ray, Bradley, Cindy Brooks Dollar, and Kelly M. Thames. 2011. “Observations of Reintegrative Shaming in a Mental Health Court.” International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 34 (1): 49–55. Elsevier Ltd.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.11.008.
  19. Rottman, David, and Pamela Casey. 1999. “Therapeutic Jurisprudence and the Emergence of Problem-Solving Courts.” National Institute of Justice Journal 240 (July): 12–19. Google Scholar
  20. Skeem, Jennifer L., Sarah Manchak, and Jillian K. Peterson. 2011. “Correctional Policy for Offenders with Mental Illness: Creating a New Paradigm for Recidivism Reduction.” Law and Human Behavior 35 (2): 110–26.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-010-9223-7.
  21. Snedker, Karen A. 2016. “Unburdening Stigma: Identity Repair through Rituals in Mental Health Court.” Society and Mental Health 6 (1): 36–55. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2156869315598203.
  22. Tyler, Tom R. 1996. “The Psychological Consequences of Judicial Procedures: Implications for Civil Committment Hearings.” In Law in a Therapeutic Key: Developments in Therapeutic Jurisprudence, 3–15. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
  23. Wales, Heathcote W., Virginia Aldigé Hiday, and Bradley Ray. 2010. “Procedural Justice and the Mental Health Court Judge’s Role in Reducing Recidivism.” International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 33 (4): 265–71. Elsevier Ltd.Google Scholar
  24. Wexler, David B. 1973. “Therapeutic Justice.” Minnesota Law Review 57: 289–338.  https://doi.org/10.3366/ajicl.2011.0005.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Seattle Pacific UniversitySeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations