Skip to main content

Statutory Interpretation Against the Background of a General Typology of Interpretation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Legal Order

Part of the book series: Law and Philosophy Library ((LAPS,volume 123))

  • 426 Accesses

Abstract

Closely connected to juridical praxeology is juridical methodology. While juridical praxeology studies juridical activities (the lawyers’ handling of legal orders), juridical methodology investigates how this handling should be performed. The principles of statutory interpretation constitute a central part of juridical methodology. In this chapter statutory interpretation is placed within a general typology of interpretation including interpretation in sciences, literature, art etc. Different concept of interpretation are presented. Against this background the established principles of statutory interpretation are discussed and systematised. The special character of statutory interpretation is analysed. This more general and comparative approach to the study of statutory interpretation is, it seems, not made before.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the sense of “precisation” used by Naess (1953). In Naess’ vocabulary, precisation is not the same as “interpretation”. While interpretation, logically speaking, is a symmetric, reflexive, and non-transitive relation, precisation is an asymmetric, irreflexive, and transitive relation. In other words, as for precisation the set of possible meanings of the result formulation is a proper subset of the set of possible meanings of the object formulation.

  2. 2.

    Carnap (1950), p. 3 ff.

  3. 3.

    In fact, the gate was never completed.

  4. 4.

    On principles of legality, see Frändberg (2014) Ch. 4.

  5. 5.

    See Subsection 7.8 above.

  6. 6.

    von Savigny (1840), pp. 212–216 differentiates between grammatical, logical, historical and systematic elements of statutory interpretation. A most instructive study from a comparative perspective is MacCormick and Summers (1991).

  7. 7.

    Ekelöf (1958).

  8. 8.

    The term used in Dworkin (1986), p. 17.

  9. 9.

    Frändberg (2014), Chs. 5, 6, 7, and 8.

  10. 10.

    The Swedish Supreme Court case NJA 1977, pp. 403 ff.

  11. 11.

    This aspect is emphasised by Strömholm (1975), p. 596 ff.

References

  • Carnap R (1950) Logical foundations of probability. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin R (1986) Law’s empire. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekelöf PO (1958) Teleological construction of statutes, Scandinavian studies in law. Almqvist & Wiksell, Uppsala

    Google Scholar 

  • Frändberg Å (2014) From Rechtsstaat to universal law-state. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacCormick N, Summers R (1991) Interpreting statutes. A comparative study. Dartmouth Publishing Company, Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Naess A (1953) Interpretation and preciseness. University of Oslo Press, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Strömholm S (1975) Har juridiken en framtid? (Has jurisprudence a future?) Svensk Juristtidning

    Google Scholar 

  • von Savigny FC (1840) System des heutigen Römischen Rechts

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Frändberg, Å. (2018). Statutory Interpretation Against the Background of a General Typology of Interpretation. In: The Legal Order. Law and Philosophy Library, vol 123. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78858-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78858-6_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78857-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78858-6

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics