Skip to main content

TopHat : Topology-Based Host-Level Attribution for Multi-stage Attacks in Enterprise Systems Using Software Defined Networks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1566 Accesses

Abstract

Multi-layer distributed systems, such as those found in corporate systems, are often the target of multi-stage attacks. Such attacks utilize multiple victim machines, in a series, to compromise a target asset deep inside the corporate network. Under such attacks, it is difficult to identify the upstream attacker’s identity from a downstream victim machine because of the mixing of multiple network flows. This is known as the attribution problem in security domains. We present TopHat, a system that solves such attribution problems for multi-stage attacks. It does this by using moving target defense, i.e., shuffling the assignment of clients to server replicas, which is achieved through software defined networking. As alerts are generated, TopHat maintains state about the level of risk for each network flow and progressively isolates the malicious flows. Using a simulation, we show that TopHat can identify single and multiple attackers in a variety of systems with different numbers of servers, layers, and clients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   143.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Terminology clarification: In this paper, we will use the term “attacker” synonymously with “attacking flow” or “malicious flow”.

  2. 2.

    http://manual-snort-org.s3-website-us-east-1.amazonaws.com/node31.html#Snort_Default_Classifications in Snort, rules are tagged with priority where “high” priority correlates with strong in our solution.

  3. 3.

    https://github.rcac.purdue.edu/DependableComputingSystemsLab/TopHat.

References

  1. Alserhani, F., Akhlaq, M., Awan, I.U., Cullen, A.J., Mirchandani, P.: MARS: multi-stage attack recognition system. In: 2010 24th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA), pp. 753–759. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baba, T., Matsuda, S.: Tracing network attacks to their sources. IEEE Internet Comput. 6(2), 20–26 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Clark, D.D., Landau, S.: The problem isn’t attribution: it’s multi-stage attacks. In: Proceedings of the Re-architecting the Internet Workshop, p. 11. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clark, D.D., Landau, S.: Untangling attribution. Harv. Nat. Secur. J. 2, 323 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dawkins, J., Hale, J.: A systematic approach to multi-stage network attack analysis. In: Proceedings of Second IEEE International Information Assurance Workshop, pp. 48–56. IEEE (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Feamster, N., Rexford, J., Zegura, E.: The road to SDN: an intellectual history of programmable networks. ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 44(2), 87–98 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jafarian, J.H., Al-Shaer, E., Duan, Q.: Openflow random host mutation: transparent moving target defense using software defined networking. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Hot Topics in Software Defined Networks, pp. 127–132. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kampanakis, P., Perros, H., Beyene, T.: SDN-based solutions for moving target defense network protection. In: 2014 IEEE 15th International Symposium on A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kannan, S., Wood, P., Deatrick, L., Beane, P., Chaterji, S., Bagchi, S.: TopHat: topology-based host-level attribution for multi-stage attacks in enterprise systems using software defined networks. Technical report, CERIAS Tech Report TR 2017-4 (2017). https://www.cerias.purdue.edu/apps/reports_and_papers/

  10. MacFarland, D.C., Shue, C.A.: The SDN shuffle: creating a moving-target defense using host-based software-defined networking. In: Proceedings of the Second ACM Workshop on Moving Target Defense, pp. 37–41. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mao, M., Humphrey, M.: A performance study on the VM startup time in the cloud. In: 2012 IEEE 5th International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD), pp. 423–430. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. McKeown, N.: Software-defined networking. INFOCOM Keynote Talk 17(2), 30–32 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Medved, J., Varga, J., Tkacik, A., Gray, K.: OpenDaylight: towards a model-driven SDN controller architecture. In: 2014 IEEE 15th International Symposium on A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Modelo-Howard, G., Sweval, J., Bagchi, S.: Secure configuration of intrusion detection sensors for changing enterprise systems. In: Rajarajan, M., Piper, F., Wang, H., Kesidis, G. (eds.) SecureComm 2011. LNICST, vol. 96, pp. 39–58. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31909-9_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Savage, S., Wetherall, D., Karlin, A., Anderson, T.: Practical network support for IP traceback. In: ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 295–306. ACM (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Strayer, W.T., Jones, C.E., Schwartz, B.I., Mikkelson, J., Livadas, C.: Architecture for multi-stage network attack traceback. In: The IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks 30th Anniversary, pp. 8–pp. IEEE (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sultan, F., Srinivasan, K., Iyer, D., Iftode, L.: Migratory TCP: connection migration for service continuity in the internet. In: Proceedings of 22nd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, pp. 469–470. IEEE (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, R., Butnariu, D., Rexford, J., et al.: Openflow-based server load balancing gone wild. Hot-ICE 11, 12 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Xu, Z., Wu, Z., Li, Z., Jee, K., Rhee, J., Xiao, X., Xu, F., Wang, H., Jiang, G.: High fidelity data reduction for big data security dependency analyses. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 504–516. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhu, Y., Bettati, R.: Unmixing mix traffic. In: Danezis, G., Martin, D. (eds.) PET 2005. LNCS, vol. 3856, pp. 110–127. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11767831_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subramaniyam Kannan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kannan, S., Wood, P., Deatrick, L., Beane, P., Chaterji, S., Bagchi, S. (2018). TopHat : Topology-Based Host-Level Attribution for Multi-stage Attacks in Enterprise Systems Using Software Defined Networks. In: Lin, X., Ghorbani, A., Ren, K., Zhu, S., Zhang, A. (eds) Security and Privacy in Communication Networks. SecureComm 2017. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 238. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78813-5_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78813-5_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78812-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78813-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics