Skip to main content

Rotation Sets

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mathematics ((LNM,volume 2214))

Abstract

Throughout this chapter d will be a fixed integer ≥ 2. We study certain invariant sets for the multiplication by d map \(m_d: {\mathbb T} \to {\mathbb T}\) defined by

$$\displaystyle m_d(t) = d t \qquad (\operatorname {mod} \ {\mathbb Z}). $$

The low-degree cases m 2 and m 3 are often referred to as the doubling and tripling maps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

eBook
USD   19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Thus, our notion of invariance is stronger than forward invariance m d (X) ⊂ X and weaker than full invariance \(m_d^{-1}(X)=X\).

  2. 2.

    Assuming \(m_d^{-1}(E)=E\) for some measurable set E, the characteristic function χ E satisfies χ E  ∘ m d  = χ E . Expanding χ E into the Fourier series \(\sum c_n e^{2 \pi i n t}\), it follows that \(\sum c_n e^{2 \pi i d n t} = \sum c_n e^{2 \pi i n t}\) which implies c n  = c dn for all n. Since c n  → 0, this can hold only if c n  = 0 for all n ≠ 0.

  3. 3.

    He proves the statement for the closure of the union of all finite rotation sets for m d , but an inspection of his proof shows that it also works for the a priori larger set \({\mathcal R}_d\). The zero dimension statement for individual rotation sets was known much earlier [29].

  4. 4.

    In fact, it will follow from the results of this section that for rotation sets minimality is equivalent to having a single dense orbit, a property that is often called point transitivity.

  5. 5.

    The terminology is meant to suggest that nothing can be added to or removed from such a set without losing the property of being a rotation set.

References

  1. A. Blokh, J. Malaugh, J. Mayer, L. Oversteegen, D. Parris, Rotational subsets of the circle under z d. Topol. Appl. 153, 1540–1570 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Bonifant, X. Buff, J. Milnor, Antipode preserving cubic maps: the Fjord theorem. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 116, 1–59 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. L. Goldberg, Fixed points of polynomial maps I: rotation subsets of the circles. Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. 25, 679–685 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. C. McMullen, Dynamics on the unit disk: short geodesics and simple cycles. Comment. Math. Helv. 85, 723–749 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Milnor, Dynamics in One Complex Variable. Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 160, 3rd edn. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Veerman, Irrational rotation numbers. Nonlinearity 2, 419–428 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zakeri, S. (2018). Rotation Sets. In: Rotation Sets and Complex Dynamics. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol 2214. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78810-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics