Building Strategies for Organizational Development with Simulation Games

  • Marcin Wardaszko
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10711)


Organizational development understood as a long-term systematic approach to the organizational change management strategy plays a very important role in management studies. One of the topics particularly interesting in this area is using simulation games as effective interventions for organizational change at the level of individuals, teams, and organizations. Based on an analytical review of the current state of theoretical and practical knowledge, the author proposes a new model of games classification in the area of strategic usage of simulation games as means to achieve goals of organizational development. The model combines the framework of both games classification and organizational goals within typical simulation gaming methods. The model has been designed to act as the basis for operationalization strategies for organizations to develop with simulation games.


Organizational change Strategic development  Games classification Organizational modelling 


  1. Argryis, C.: Double-loop learning and organizational change: facilitating transformational change. In: Boonstra, J. (ed.) Dynamics of Organizational Change and Learning. Wiley, Chichester (2004)Google Scholar
  2. Balcerak, A.: Symulacja interaktywna we wspomaganiu rozwoju organizacji. Zeszyt Naukowy Studia i prace wydziału nauk ekonomicznych i zarządzania 39(4), 335–346 (2015)Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A.: Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Freeman, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  4. Creswell, J.: Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Method Approaches. SAGE, London (2002)Google Scholar
  5. Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper Perennial, New York (1990). Simul. Gaming 41(3), 341–359 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. Cummings, T., Worley, C.: Organisational Development and Change. South Western Collage Publishing, Mason (2001)Google Scholar
  7. Dale, E.: Audiovisual Methods in Teaching. Dryden Press, New York (1969)Google Scholar
  8. De Caluwé, L.: Using simulation gaming for change of organisations and for change of corporate culture. In: Kriz, W.C. (ed.) Planspiele für die Organisationsentwicklung. Wandel und Kontinuität in Organisationen. Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Berlin, Berlin (2007)Google Scholar
  9. De Caluwé, L.: The active substance from the perspective of change. In: de Caluwé, L., Hofstede, G.J., Peters, V. (eds.) Why Do Games Work? Search of the Active Substance. Kluwer, Deventer (2008)Google Scholar
  10. De Caluwé, L., Geurts, J., Kleinlugtenbelt, W.J.: Gaming research in policy and organization: an assessment from the Netherlands. Simul. Gaming 43(5), 600–626 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Caluwé, L., Geurts, J.: The use and effectiveness of gaming/simulation for strategic culture change. In: Saunders, D., Severn, J. (eds.) The International Simulation and Gaming Research Yearbook, vol. 7, Simulations and Games for Strategic Planning and Development. Kogan Page, London (1998)Google Scholar
  12. Duke, R.D.: Gaming: The Future’s Language. SAGE, London (1974)Google Scholar
  13. Ellington, H.I., Addinall, E., Percival, F.: A Handbook of Game Design. Kogan Page, London (1982)Google Scholar
  14. Ellington, H.I., Addinall, E., Percival, F.: Case Studies in Game Design. Kogan Page, London (1984)Google Scholar
  15. Ellington, H.I., Addinall, E., Percival, F., Lewis, J.L.: Using simulations and case studies in the ASE’s (“Science in Society” project). In: Megarry, J. (ed.) Perspectives on Academic Gaming and Simulation 4, pp. 79–88. Kogan Page, London (1979)Google Scholar
  16. French, W.L., Bell, C.H.: Organization Development. Behavioral Science Interventions for Organizational Improvement, 6th edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1999)Google Scholar
  17. Gonzalez, C.R.: Education for management. Pros & cons of using case method in the XXI century. J. Exec. Educ. 10(1), 117–126 (2011)Google Scholar
  18. Hamari, J., Koivisto, J.: Measuring flow in gamification: Dispositional Flow Scale-2. Comput. Hum. Behav. 40, 133–143 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., Sarsa, H.: Does gamification work? – a literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In: Proceedings of the 47th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, USA, 6–9 January 2014Google Scholar
  20. Hamari, J., Shernoff, D.J., Rowe, E., Coller, B., Edwards, T.: Challenging games help students learn: an empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game-based learning. Comput. Hum. Behav. 54, 170–179 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huczynski, A., Buchanan, D.: Organizational behavior. An introductory text, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2001)Google Scholar
  22. Huizinga, J.: Homo Lundes. Play as a Source of Culture. Czytelnik, Warsaw (1985)Google Scholar
  23. Keys, B., Wolfe, J.: The role of management games and simulations in education and research. J. Manag. 16(2), 307–336 (1990)Google Scholar
  24. Klabbers, J.: Three easy pieces: a taxonomy on gaming. In: Sounders, D., Severn, J. (eds.) Simulation and Games for Strategy and Policy Planning, pp. 16–33. Kogan Page, London (1999)Google Scholar
  25. Klabbers, J.: Gaming and simulation: principles of a science of design. Simul. Gaming 34(4), 569–591 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Klabbers, J.: A framework for artifact assessment and theory testing. Simul. Gaming 37, 155–173 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Klabbers, J.: The Magic Circle: Principles of Gaming & Simulation. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam (2008)Google Scholar
  28. Kolb, D.A., Fry, R.: Toward an applied theory of experiential learning. In: Cooper, C. (ed.) Theories of Group Processes. Wiley, London (1975)Google Scholar
  29. Korten, F., De Caluwé, L., Geurts, J.: The future of organization development: a Delphi study among Dutch experts. J. Change Manag. 10(4), 393–405 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kriz, W.C.: Creating effective interactive learning environments through gaming simulation design. J. Simul. Gaming 34(4), 495–511 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kriz, W.C.: Planspiele für die Organisationsentwicklung. Wandel und Kontinuität in Organisationen. Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Berlin, Berlin (2007)Google Scholar
  32. Kriz, W.C.: Qualitätskriterien von Planspielanwendungen. In: Hitzler, S., Zürn, B., Trautwein, F. (eds.) Planspiele – Qualität und Innovation. Neue Ansätze aus Theorie und Praxis (ZMS Schriftenreihe Band 2), p. 11. Books on Demand, Norderstedt (2011)Google Scholar
  33. Simon, H.: The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, Boston (1969)Google Scholar
  34. Kriz, W.C., Hense, J.: Theory-oriented evaluation for the design of and research in gaming and simulation. J. Simul. Gaming 37(2), 268–283 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kriz, W.C., Nöbauer, B.: Teamkompetenz. Konzepte – Trainingsmethoden – Praxis, 4 Auflage. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen (2008)Google Scholar
  36. Kriz, W.C. (ed.): Planspiele für die Organisationsentwicklung. WVB, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  37. Leavitt, H.J.: Applied organization change in industry: structural, technical and human approaches. In: Marcha, J.G. (ed.) Handbook of Organization, Chicago (1965)Google Scholar
  38. Mayer, R.E., Johnson, C.I.: Adding instructional features that promote learning in a game-like environment. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 42(3), 241–265 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McClelland, D.C.: Human Motivation. Scot Foresman, New York (1985)Google Scholar
  40. Mulili, B.M., Wong, P.: Continuous organizational development (COD). Ind. Commer. Train. 43(6), 377–384 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Prensky, M.: Digital Game-Based Learning. McGraw Hill, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  42. Ruohomäki, V.: Simulation gaming for organizational development. Simul. Gaming 34(4), 531–549 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vygotsky, L.S.: Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1978)Google Scholar
  44. Wenzler, I.: The role of simulation games in transformational change (2008)Google Scholar
  45. Wieck, K.E.: The Social Psychology of Organizing. Addison Wesley, London (1979)Google Scholar
  46. Yin, R.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd edn. SAGE Publication, Thousand Oaks (2003). Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit, 227(5), 407–418Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kozminski UniversityWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations