Soft Overcomes Hard: Simulation Leadership as Mediation of Choice Architectures

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10711)

Abstract

Teachers, many of whom are trained to lead their students through learning activities, as a director of learning processes may find that they struggle to use simulations. Simulations—dynamic, chaordic, and often unpredictable—tax the conventional model of classroom leadership; they require instead a leadership model that is flexible, responsive, and equally dynamic. Simulations are activities that typically represent processes or systems that flow and develop from their own inertia. Teachers who use this approach to learning need not be involved as overtly in the process of the simulation as they do with more traditional teaching activities. Yet, it can be difficult for teachers to reimagine a leadership role that largely removes them from the activity. As a result, they may impose themselves in ways that are disruptive to the natural flow of the simulation. In this paper, I propose a conceptual framework to help teachers reimagine their role as leaders in simulations. This framework draws on work in the field of behavioral economics to help teachers to engage in the simulation leadership process less directly and yet more effectively by adopting a leadership approach based in libertarian paternalism through the use of design architectures.

Keywords

Simulation Social studies Libertarian paternalism 

References

  1. Apple, M.W.: Ideology and Curriculum. RoutledgeFalmer, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  2. Ariely, D.: Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces that Shape Our Decisions. HarperCollins, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  3. Bourdieu, P.: Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eshel, Y., Kohavi, R.: Perceived classroom control, self-regulated learning strategies, and academic achievement. Educ. Psychol. 23(3), 249–260 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Giroux, H.: Teachers as transformative intellectuals. In: Canestrari, A.S., Marlowe, B.A. (eds.) Educational Foundations: An anthology of Critical Readings, 2nd edn, pp. 197–204. Sage, Los Angeles (2010)Google Scholar
  6. Kaufman, D., Moss, D.: A new look at preservice teachers’ conceptions of classroom management and organization: uncovering complexity and dissonance. Teach. Educ. 45(2), 118–136 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kiany, G.R., Shayestefar, P.: High school students’ perceptions of EFL teacher control orientations and their English academic achievement. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 81(3), 491–508 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Tzu, L.: Tao Te Ching. Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis (1993). Trans. by S. Addiss, S. Lombardo (Original work published ca. 500 BCE)Google Scholar
  9. McLaren, P.: Life in Schools: An Introduction to Critical Pedagogy in the Foundations of Education, 4th edn. Pearson Education, Boston (2003)Google Scholar
  10. McNeil, L.M.: Defensive teaching and classroom control (report). National Institute of Education, Washington DC (1982). Accessed from Eric database. (ED221958)Google Scholar
  11. McNeil, L.M.: Contradictions of Control: School Structure and School Knowledge. Routledge, New York (1986)Google Scholar
  12. Nye Jr., J.S.: Soft power. Foreign Policy 80, 153–171 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pace, J.L.: Saving (and losing) face, race, and authority: strategies of action in a 9th grade English class. In: Pace, J.L., Hemmings, A. (eds.) Classroom Authority: Theory, Research, and Practice, pp. 87–112. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2006)Google Scholar
  14. Pace, J.L., Hemmings, A.: Understanding authority in classrooms: a review of theory, ideology, and research. Rev. Educ. Res. 77(1), 4–27 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ross, E.W.: Exploring Taylorism and its continued influence on work and schooling. In: Heilman, E.E., Amthor, R.F., Missias, M.T. (eds.) Social Studies and Diversity Education, pp. 33–37. Routledge, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  16. Shernoff, D.J., Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Cultivating engaged learners and optimal learning environments. In: Handbook of Positive Psychology in Schools, pp. 131–145 (2009)Google Scholar
  17. Thaler, R.H., Sunstein, C.R.: Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University Press, New Haven (2009)Google Scholar
  18. Wright-Maley, C.: On “stepping back and letting go”: the role of control in the success or failure of social studies simulations. Theory Res. Soc. Educ. 43(2), 206–243 (2015a).  https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2015.1034394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wright-Maley, C.: Beyond the “Babel problem”: defining simulations for the social studies. J. Soc. Stud. Res. 39(2), 63–77 (2015b).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.214.10.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.St. Mary’s UniversityCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations