National Internet Pro-voting Campaigns and Local Watchdog Websites: Practicing Civil Society Online

  • Helena Chmielewska-Szlajfer


The chapter focuses on the reemergence of grassroots civic engagement in contemporary Poland. The national internet pro-voting campaigns and local watchdog websites show a departure from a detached and clientelistic approach to the state; rather, they point at people’s desire for civic engagement. While national internet pro-voting campaigns focus on encouraging people to cast their ballot, local watchdog websites provide independent news and offer space for discussion on local governments. They provide anonymity for people to discuss matters of public concern without the fear of being harassed by the authorities, yet with online visibility that has the power to influence them. I argue that these websites are public spaces where shared notions of a common good become visible and practiced. The Polish cases are put into broader perspective by looking at the influential role of the Rock the Vote campaigns, which succeeded in engaging young voters in the United States.


  1. Annenberg Public Policy Center. (2014). Americans know surprisingly little about their government. Philadelphia: University of Pensylvania.Google Scholar
  2. Arato, A., & Cohen, J. (1993). Civil society and political theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Ash, T. G. (1990). The magic lantern: The revolution of ‘89 witnessed in Warsaw, Budapest, Berlin, and Prague. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  5. Barber, B. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  6. Batko-Tołuć, K., & Izdebski, K. (2012). Watchdog organizations: Current status, challenges, prospects. Warsaw: Institute of Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  7. Beem, C. (1999). The necessity of politics: Reclaiming American public life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Birkner, C. (2016). After 26 years, Rock the Vote is still driving young people to the polls. Adweek. Retrieved from
  9. Boczkowski, P. J., & Mitchelstein, E. (2013). The news gap: When information preferences of the media and the public diverge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the internet age. Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  11. CBOS. (2013). Powinności państwa wobec obywatela i obywatela wobec państwa. Warsaw: Author.Google Scholar
  12. Chmielewska-Szlajfer, H. (2018). Opinion dailies versus Facebook fan pages. The case of Poland’s surprising 2015 presidential elections. Media, Culture & Society, First Published February 6, 2018.Google Scholar
  13. Cloonan, M., & Street, J. (1998). Rock the Vote: Popular culture and politics. Politics, 18(1), 33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen, J. (1995). Interpreting the notion of civil society. In M. Walzer (Ed.), Toward a global civil society (pp. 35–40). Providence: Berghahn Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Czapiński, J., & Panek, T. (Eds.). (2015). Social diagnosis 2015. Warsaw: The Council for Social Monitoring.Google Scholar
  16. Danielewicz, M., & Mazurek, P. (2012). Technospołecznicy: Rozkwit mediów lokalnych. Warsaw: Centrum Cyfrowe.Google Scholar
  17. Dayan, D. (2013). Conquering visibility, conferring visibility: Visibility seekers and media performance. International Journal of Communication, 7, 137–153.Google Scholar
  18. Dewey, J. (1991). The public and its problems. Chicago: Swallow Press.Google Scholar
  19. Dubet, F., Touraine, A., & Wieviorka, M. (1982). A social movement: Solidarity. Telos, (53), 128–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dwyer, J. (2008, October 25). Digital-age voters in electoral limbo. The New York Times, p. A19.Google Scholar
  21. Ekiert, G., Kubik, J., & Wenzel, M. (2017). Civil society and three dimensions of inequality in post-1989 Poland. Comparative Politics, 49(3), 331–350.Google Scholar
  22. Eurostat. (2017). Voter turnout in national and EU parliamentary elections. Retrieved from
  23. Flash Eurobarometer. (2013). Europeans’ Engagement in Participatory Democracy, 373.Google Scholar
  24. Friszke, A. (2011). Czas KOR-u: Jacek Kuroń a geneza Solidarności. Krakow: Znak.Google Scholar
  25. Gdula, M. (2017). Dobra zmiana w Miastku. Neoautorytaryzm w polskiej polityce z perspektywy małego miasta. Warsaw: Krytyka Polityczna.Google Scholar
  26. Gellner, E. (1994). The conditions of liberty: Civil society and its rivals. New York: Allen Lane/Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  27. Glass, S. (1997). Rock the morons. The New Republic, 216, 16–17.Google Scholar
  28. Gliński, P. (2006). The third sector in Poland. Dilemmas of development. In D. Gawin & P. Gliński (Eds.), Civil Society in the Making (pp. 265–291). Warsaw: IFiS Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Gliński, P. (2011). Twenty years of civil society in Poland? Polish Sociological Review, 3(175), 271–301.Google Scholar
  30. Gliński, P., & Palska, H. (1997). Cztery wymiary społecznej aktywności obywatelskiej. In H. Domański & A. Rychard (Eds.), Elementy nowego ładu (pp. 356–392). Warsaw: IFiS PAN.Google Scholar
  31. Goldfarb, J. (1982). On cultural freedom: An exploration of public life in Poland and America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Goldfarb, J. (2006). Politics of small things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grabowska, M. (Ed.). (2012). Społeczeństwo obywatelskie w Polsce A.D. 2012. CBOS Opinie i Diagnozy, 22.Google Scholar
  34. Grabowska, M., & Sułek, A. (1992). Stefan Nowak jako badacz społeczeństwa polskiego. In A. Sułek (Ed.), Dziedzictwo Stefana Nowaka (pp. 14–29). Warsaw: Instytut Socjologii UW.Google Scholar
  35. Green, D. P., & Vavreck, L. (2008). Analysis of cluster- randomized experiments: A comparison of alternative estimation approaches. Political Analysis, 16(2), 138–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Grzymała-Busse, A. M. (2004). Redeeming the communist past: The regeneration of communist parties in East Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Habermas, J. (1974). The public sphere: An encyclopedia article (1964). New German Critique, (3), 49–55.Google Scholar
  38. Hausner, J. (1992). Populist threat in transformation of socialist society. Warsaw: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.Google Scholar
  39. Havel, V. (2010). The power of the powerless: Citizens against the state in Central-Eastern Europe. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Highfield, T. (2016). Social media and everyday politics. Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  41. Hindman, M. (2009). The myth of digital democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Janicki, M. (2017). Jakiej Polski chcą Polacy? Polityka, 49, 24–27.Google Scholar
  43. Jasiewicz, K. (2009). The past is never dead. Identity, class, and voting behavior in contemporary Poland. East European Politics and Societies, 23(4), 491–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kinowska, Z. (2012). Kondycja społeczeństwa obywatelskiego w Polsce. Infos Biuro Analiz Sejmowych, 22(136), 1–4.Google Scholar
  45. Kościański, A. (2006). Making the net. The emergence of internet-related civic engagement in Poland. In D. Gawin & P. Gliński (Eds.), Civil society in the making (pp. 236–263). Warsaw: IFiS Publishers.Google Scholar
  46. Król, M. (1993). Między korporacją a społeczeństwem obywatelskim. In B. Markiewicz (Ed.), Obywatel. Odrodzenie pojęcia (pp. 107–112). Warsaw: IFiS PAN.Google Scholar
  47. Król, M. (2015). Byliśmy głupi. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Czerwone i Czarne.Google Scholar
  48. Matynia, E. (2009). Performative democracy. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  49. Mckinney, M. S., & Banwart, M. C. (2005). Rocking the youth vote through debate: Examining the effects of a citizen versus journalist controlled debate on civic engagement. Journalism Studies, 6(2), 153–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Michnik, A. (1985). Letters from prison and other essays. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  51. Nowak, S. (2004). Postawy, wartości i aspiracje społeczeństwa polskiego. In S. Nowak (Ed.), Społeczeństwo polskie czasu kryzysu (pp. 337–380). Warsaw: IFiS UW.Google Scholar
  52. Nowak, S. (2011). System wartości społeczeństwa polskiego. Studia Socjologiczne, 1(200), 261–278.Google Scholar
  53. Ogrodziński, P. (1991). Pięć tesktów o społeczeństwie obywatelskim. Warsaw: ISP PAN.Google Scholar
  54. Ogrodziński, P., & Szlajfer, H. (1992). Is the Catholic Church a threat to democracy? East European Reporter, 5(3), 17–20.Google Scholar
  55. Ossowska, M. (1983). O człowieku, moralności i nauce. Miscellanea. Warsaw: PWN.Google Scholar
  56. PAP. (2015, September 15). Eksperci: oto najpopularniejsze tematy kampanii wyborczej. Retrieved from,476.html
  57. Papacharissi, Z. (2009). The virtual sphere 2.0. The internet, the public sphere, and beyond. In A. Chadwick & P. N. Howard (Eds.), Routledge handbook of internet politics (pp. 230–245). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Papacharissi, Z. (2010). A private sphere: Democracy in a digital age. Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  59. Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work. Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Raciborski, J. (2011). Wyborca czasu zmiany ustrojowej. In M. Bucholc, S. Mandes, T. Szawiel, & J. Wawrzyniak (Eds.), Polska po 20 latach wolności (pp. 96–114). Warsaw: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.Google Scholar
  62. Rosanvallon, P. (2008). Counter-democracy: Politics in an age of distrust. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rosanvallon, P. (2011). Democratic legitimacy: Impartiality, reflexivity, proximity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Schütz, A. (1946). The well-informed citizen. An essay on the social distribution of knowledge. Social Research, 13(1/4), 463–478.Google Scholar
  65. sk, mc. (2015). Jarosław Kaczyński boi się, że uchodźcy sprowadzą zarazę? Tak mówił na wyborczym wiecu. Gazeta Wyborcza. Retrieved from,75398,19014711,kaczynski-boi-sie-zarazy.html
  66. Smith, H. (2007). Rock the Vote 2.0. Esquire. Retrieved from
  67. Śpiewak, P. (2011). Polskie spory ideowe i nasze rozmowy o pamięci. In M. Bucholc, S. Mandes, T. Szawiel, & J. Wawrzyniak (Eds.), Polska po 20 latach wolności (pp. 501–519). Warsaw: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.Google Scholar
  68. Sroczyński, G., & Król, M. (2014, February 7). Byliśmy głupi. Gazeta Wyborcza. Retrieved from,124059,15414610,Bylismy_glupi.html
  69. Sunstein, C. R. (2007). 2.0. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  70. Szacki, J. (Ed.). (1997). Ani książę, ani kupiec: obywatel. Krakow: Znak.Google Scholar
  71. Szawiel, T. (2003). Podział na lewicę i prawicę w Polsce po 1989 roku – jego sens i trwałość. In M. Radosław (Ed.), System partyjny i zachowania wyborcze. Dekada polskich doświadczeń (1989/1991–2001) (pp. 178–216). Warsaw: Instytut Studiów Politycznych PAN, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.Google Scholar
  72. Szawiel, T. (2011). Konsolidacja demokracji w Polsce: poparcie dla demokracji, społeczeństwo obywatelskie i system partyjny. In M. Bucholc, S. Mandes, T. Szawiel, & J. Wawrzyniak (Eds.), Polska po 20 latach wolności (pp. 54–79). Warsaw: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.Google Scholar
  73. Szeremeta, A. (2016). Wynagrodzenia w Warszawie w 2015 roku. Kraków: Sedlak & Sedlak.Google Scholar
  74. Szlachcicowa, I. (2008). Wzory działań społecznych w perspektywie teorii ugruntowanej. In M. Nowak & M. Nowosielski (Eds.), Jak badać społeczeństwo obywatelskie. Doświadczenia praktyków (pp. 97–112). Poznan: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.Google Scholar
  75. Sztompka, P. (1993). Civilizational incompetence: The trap of post-communist societies. Zeitschrift für Sociologie, 22(2), 85–95.Google Scholar
  76. Sztompka, P. (1996). Looking back: The year 1989 as a cultural and civilizational break. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 29(2), 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Szuleka, M., Wolny, M., & Szwed, M. (2016). The constitutional crisis in Poland 2015–2016. Warsaw: Helskinki Foundation for Human Rights.Google Scholar
  78. Tavits, M., & Letki, N. (2009). When left is right: Party ideology and policy in post-communist Europe. American Political Science Review, 103(4), 555–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tewksbury, D., & Rittenberg, J. (2009). Online news creation and consumption. Implications for modern democracies. In A. Chadwick & P. N. Howard (Eds.), Routledge handbook of internet politics (pp. 186–200). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  80. Tocqueville, A. (2003). Democracy in America. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  81. Touraine, A. (1983). Solidarity. The analysis of a social movement: Poland, 1980–1981. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Troszyński, M. (2012). Raport mniejszości. Język wrogości i mowa nienawiści w polskim internecie. Warsaw: Fundacja Wiedza Lokalna.Google Scholar
  83. TVN24. (2017). Do not wipe your treacherous mouths with my brother’s name. Retrieved from,157,m/do-not-wipe-your-treacherous-mouths-with-my-brother-s-name,758290.html
  84. Wajer, M. (2011, December 24). Powiat kościerski: Wójt Dziemian Leszek Pobłocki wytoczył wojnę internautom, Dziennik Bałtycki. Retrieved from,powiat-koscierski-wojt-dziemian-leszek-poblocki-wytoczyl-wojne-internautom,id,t.html
  85. Wiatr, J. J. (2006). Europa pokomunistyczna: przemiany państw i społeczeństw po 1989 roku. Warsaw: Scholar.Google Scholar
  86. Wilgocki, M. (2018, January 4). Sondaż CBOS: 2017 był dla Polaków najlepszym rokiem od 1989. Gazeta Wyborcza. Retrieved from,75398,22854905,2017-byl-najlepszym-rokiem-od-1989-sondaz-cbos.html

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helena Chmielewska-Szlajfer
    • 1
  1. 1.Koźmiński UniversityWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations