Abstract
A philosophical understanding of race begins with the canon. In the Republic, Socrates proposed telling youth that they are born with traits of leaders, soldiers, or workers. Aristotle accepted slavery as natural and described enslaved Asians as lacking in spirit. Saint Paul and Saint Aquinas accepted slavery in this world. John Locke reserved slavery for captives taken in a just war. Hume said that nonwhites, especially Africans, are inferior to whites. Kant posited racial essences as determining moral worth and intellectual capabilities. Hegel posited geography as determining human difference and called Africa “the land of childhood.” Nietzsche assumed racial hierarchy and proposed a new blonde ruling race. John Stuart Mill reserved liberty for mature individuals and societies advanced in civilization.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aquinas, Saint Thomas. On Law, Morality, and Politics, edited by William P. Baumgarth and Richard J. Regan. S.J. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1988.
Appiah, K. Anthony. “Racisms.” Anatomy of Racism, edited by David Theo Goldberg. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, 1990, pp. 3–17.
Armitage, David. “John Locke, Carolina, and the Two Treatises of Government.” Political Theory, vol. 32, no. 5, Oct. 2004, pp. 602–27.
Aristotle. “Politica.” The Basic Works of Aristotle, edited by Richard McKeon. New York, NY: Random House, 1941, pp. 1127–33.
Beattie, James. “‘A Response to Hume’ from An Essay on the Nature and Immutability of Truth, in Opposition to Sophistry and Skepticism.” Race and the Enlightenment: A Reader, edited by Emmanuel Chukwudi Eze. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1997, pp. 34–7.
Bernasconi, Robert. “Kolb’s Pre-racial Encounter with the Hottentots and Its Impact on Buffon, Kant, and Rousseau.” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, Special Issue on Race in the History of Philosophy, New School University, 2014, pp. 101–24.
Bernasconi, Robert. “Nietzsche as a Philosopher of Racialized Breeding.” Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Race, edited by Naomi Zack. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2017.
Boxill, Bernard. “Kantian Racism and Kantian Teleology.” Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Race, edited by Naomi Zack. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2017.
Count, Earl W. “The Evolution of the Race Idea in Modern Western Culture During the Period of the Pre-Darwinian Nineteenth Century.” Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 8, 1946, pp. 139–65.
Count, Earl W., ed. This is Race: An Anthology Selected from the International Literature on the Races of Man. New York, NY: Henry Schuman, 1950.
Davies, K.G. The Royal African Company. London: Longmans Green, 1957, pp. 1–37.
Eze, Emmanuel Chukwudi. “The Color of Reason: The Idea of ‘Race’ in Kant’s Anthropology.” Anthropology and the German Enlightenment, edited by Katherine Faull. London: Bucknell and Associates Press, 1994, Chap. IV, vol. 8, reprinted in Race and the Enlightenment, edited by Eze, pp. 103–31.
Finley, M.I. Ancient Slavery and Modern Ideology. New York, NY: Penguin, 1983.
Garrett, Aaron, and Silvia Sebastiani. “David Hume on Race.” Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Race, edited by Naomi Zack. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2017.
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Fredrich. “‘Geographical Bases of World History,’ from Lectures on the Philosophy of World History.” Race and the Enlightenment: A Reader, edited by Emmanuel Chukwudi Eze. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1997, p. 124.
Hudson, Nicholas. “From ‘Nation’ to ‘Race’: The Origin of Racial Classification in Eighteenth-Century Thought.” Eighteenth-Century Studies, vol. 29, no. 3, Spring 1996, pp. 247–64.
Hume, David. “Of National Characters.” Essays Moral, Political and Literary, edited by T.H. Green and T.H. Grose. London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1875a, Essay XXI.
Hume, David. “Of the Populousness of Ancient Nations.” Essays Moral, Political and Literary, edited by T.H. Green and T.H. Grose. London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1875b, Essay XI.
Hume, David. “Of National Characters.” The Philosophical Works, edited by Thomas Hill Green and Thomas Hodge Grose. Darmstadt, West Germany: Scientia Verlag Aalen, 1964, 4 vols., 3: 252, n.1.
Jiménez, Erick Raphael. “Aristotle on Natural Slavery: The Race Question.” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, Special Issue on Race in the History of Philosophy, New School University, 2014, pp. 53–80.
Justinian. Digest of Justinian. Translated by Charles Henry Monro. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2014, Book I, vol. 3, p. 24.
Kamp, H. W. “Concerning Seneca’s Exile.” The Classical Journal, vol. 30, no. 2, 1934, pp. 101–8.
Kamtakar, Rashama. “Distinction Without a Difference: Race and Genos in Plato.” Philosophers on Race: Critical Essays, edited by Julie K. Ward and Tommie L. Lott. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 2002, pp. 1–13.
Kant, Immanuel. “On the Different Races of Man or On the Different Races of Human Beings.” This Is Race: An Anthology Selected from the International Literature on the Races of Man, edited by Earl W. Count. New York, NY: Schuman, 1950, pp. 16–24.
Kant, Immanuel. Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and the Sublime. Translated by John T. Goldthwait. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1965.
Kant, Immanuel. “Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals.” Kant’s Ethical Philosophy. Translated by James W. Ellington. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1994, Warner A. Wick, Introduction.
Kant, Immanuel, Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Translated by Hans H. Rudnick and edited by Victor Lyle Dowdell. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1996.
Kant, Immanuel. “Of National Characteristics, from Physical Geography.” Race and the Enlightenment, edited by Eze, Chap. 4.
Locke, John. A Letter Concerning Toleration. Latin and English Texts Revised and edited by Mario Montuori. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1963.
Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, edited by Peter H. Niddich. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975, Book IV, Chap. iii, Sec. 5, pp. 338–40; iii, 27, pp. 414–5; iv, 27, p. 454.
Locke, John. Two Treatises of Government, edited by Peter Laslett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, (1689) 1991.
MacInnes, C. M. England and Slavery. Bristol: Arrowsmith, 1934, pp. 13–21.
Mayr, Ernst. Systematics and the Origin of Species. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1942.
McCarthy, Thomas. Race, Empire, and the Idea of Human Development. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Melzer, Milton. Slavery: A World History. 2 vols. New York, NY: Da Capo Press, 1993.
Noonan, John T., Jr. “Development in Moral Doctrine.” The Context of Casuistry, edited by James F. Keenan and Thomas A. Shannon. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1995, pp. 188–204.
Plato. “Republic.” The Collected Dialogues of Plato, edited by Edith Hamilton and Huntington Cairns and translated by Paul Shorey. New York: Bollingen Foundation, Pantheon Books, Random House, 1964, pp. 575–844.
Popkin, Richard H. “Hume’s Racism.” Philosophical Forum, vol. 9/2, no. 2–3, 1977–1978, pp. 211–26.
Rosen, Michael. Dignity: Its History and Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.
Uzgalis, William. “John Locke, Racism, Slavery, and Indian Lands.” Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Race, edited by Naomi Zack. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Essay and Discussion Questions
Essay and Discussion Questions
-
1.
Why do you think it’s important to avoid anachronism in discussing ideas resembling race before the modern period?
-
2.
What are the main differences between Plato and Aristotle’s views of who should be enslaved?
-
3.
Do you think Locke’s failure to extend fundamental rights to women, the poor, and non-Europeans means that his political philosophy was not based on his avowed principles of liberty and freedom?
-
4.
What are the implications of the fact that Africans were enslaved before a biological concept of human races were developed?
-
5.
Hume was a polygenist and Kant was a monogenist. Explain how their assessments of racial differences were or were not related to their different beliefs about human origins.
-
6.
Explain and critically evaluate the difference between Kant’s claim that Africans lacked intelligence and reason and that they lacked taste.
-
7.
How did Kant’s reliance on racial essences and Hegel’s on geography influence their views of human races?
-
8.
What are the implications of John Stuart Mill’s restrictions of liberty to Europeans?
-
9.
In what ways was Nietzsche a racialist? Was he also a racist?
-
10.
How might a philosopher’s views on race be relevant to other aspects of that thinker’s work? How are nonracial views held by a philosopher related to that thinkers’ views on race?
Glossary
- autonomy
-
—self-rule, being in charge of one’s own life.
- biological racial determinism
-
—idea that inherited human racial traits determine social, psychological, physical, and cultural traits.
- deliberation
-
—for Aristotle, the intellectual activity of practical wisdom that allows one to practice or develop virtues.
- dignitarian
-
—pertaining to the intrinsic value of human individuals.
- essences
-
—qualities of things that make them what they are and cause their other qualities.
- ethnology
-
—nineteenth-century studies of the history of human cultures that related cultural differences to inherited racial traits.
- eugenics
-
—practice and ideology of improving the quality of humanity by regulating who can have children, and with whom.
- identity
-
—what a person is, naturally or in society.
- intrinsic worth (dignity)
-
—valuable in itself (to itself).
- monogenist (ism)
-
—belief that all human groups, including races, had the same origins.
- moral
-
—adjective connoting human culture, ethics, psychology, and studies thereof.
- nominalism
-
—philosophical doctrine that the distinguishing marks of a certain type of thing or of all types of things are matters of language and human decision and convention, rather than what actually exists in nature or in the external world.
- natural kind
-
—a type of thing that exists on its own in nature, without human invention.
- Philosophy of Race
-
—descriptive and normative philosophical inquiry into racial differences and injustice related to them.
- polygenist(ism)
-
—belief that human groups, especially races, had different origins.
- phronesis
-
—for Aristotle, practical reasoning about how to act.
- racialism
-
—belief that there are human races or that humankind is divided into races.
- racism
-
—negative assessment of some human races and their members, compared to others.
- species
-
—most common division in biological taxonomy; members of a species share its defining traits and can breed amongst themselves but not with members of other species.
- systematics
-
—biological naming and classifying living things as individuals and groups, in relation to one another.
- teleology
-
—determination or causation by an end goal.
- thumos
-
—(Greek) spiritedness.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zack, N. (2018). Ideas of Race in the Canonical History of Philosophy. In: Philosophy of Race. Palgrave Philosophy Today. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78729-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78729-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78728-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78729-9
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)