Skip to main content

Ideas of Race in the Canonical History of Philosophy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Philosophy of Race

Part of the book series: Palgrave Philosophy Today ((PPT))

  • 102k Accesses

Abstract

A philosophical understanding of race begins with the canon. In the Republic, Socrates proposed telling youth that they are born with traits of leaders, soldiers, or workers. Aristotle accepted slavery as natural and described enslaved Asians as lacking in spirit. Saint Paul and Saint Aquinas accepted slavery in this world. John Locke reserved slavery for captives taken in a just war. Hume said that nonwhites, especially Africans, are inferior to whites. Kant posited racial essences as determining moral worth and intellectual capabilities. Hegel posited geography as determining human difference and called Africa “the land of childhood.” Nietzsche assumed racial hierarchy and proposed a new blonde ruling race. John Stuart Mill reserved liberty for mature individuals and societies advanced in civilization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aquinas, Saint Thomas. On Law, Morality, and Politics, edited by William P. Baumgarth and Richard J. Regan. S.J. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appiah, K. Anthony. “Racisms.” Anatomy of Racism, edited by David Theo Goldberg. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, 1990, pp. 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, David. “John Locke, Carolina, and the Two Treatises of Government.” Political Theory, vol. 32, no. 5, Oct. 2004, pp. 602–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. “Politica.” The Basic Works of Aristotle, edited by Richard McKeon. New York, NY: Random House, 1941, pp. 1127–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beattie, James. “‘A Response to Hume’ from An Essay on the Nature and Immutability of Truth, in Opposition to Sophistry and Skepticism.” Race and the Enlightenment: A Reader, edited by Emmanuel Chukwudi Eze. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1997, pp. 34–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernasconi, Robert. “Kolb’s Pre-racial Encounter with the Hottentots and Its Impact on Buffon, Kant, and Rousseau.” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, Special Issue on Race in the History of Philosophy, New School University, 2014, pp. 101–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernasconi, Robert. “Nietzsche as a Philosopher of Racialized Breeding.” Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Race, edited by Naomi Zack. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boxill, Bernard. “Kantian Racism and Kantian Teleology.” Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Race, edited by Naomi Zack. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Count, Earl W. “The Evolution of the Race Idea in Modern Western Culture During the Period of the Pre-Darwinian Nineteenth Century.” Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 8, 1946, pp. 139–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Count, Earl W., ed. This is Race: An Anthology Selected from the International Literature on the Races of Man. New York, NY: Henry Schuman, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, K.G. The Royal African Company. London: Longmans Green, 1957, pp. 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eze, Emmanuel Chukwudi. “The Color of Reason: The Idea of ‘Race’ in Kant’s Anthropology.” Anthropology and the German Enlightenment, edited by Katherine Faull. London: Bucknell and Associates Press, 1994, Chap. IV, vol. 8, reprinted in Race and the Enlightenment, edited by Eze, pp. 103–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finley, M.I. Ancient Slavery and Modern Ideology. New York, NY: Penguin, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, Aaron, and Silvia Sebastiani. “David Hume on Race.” Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Race, edited by Naomi Zack. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Fredrich. “‘Geographical Bases of World History,’ from Lectures on the Philosophy of World History.” Race and the Enlightenment: A Reader, edited by Emmanuel Chukwudi Eze. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1997, p. 124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, Nicholas. “From ‘Nation’ to ‘Race’: The Origin of Racial Classification in Eighteenth-Century Thought.” Eighteenth-Century Studies, vol. 29, no. 3, Spring 1996, pp. 247–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, David. “Of National Characters.” Essays Moral, Political and Literary, edited by T.H. Green and T.H. Grose. London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1875a, Essay XXI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, David. “Of the Populousness of Ancient Nations.” Essays Moral, Political and Literary, edited by T.H. Green and T.H. Grose. London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1875b, Essay XI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, David. “Of National Characters.” The Philosophical Works, edited by Thomas Hill Green and Thomas Hodge Grose. Darmstadt, West Germany: Scientia Verlag Aalen, 1964, 4 vols., 3: 252, n.1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez, Erick Raphael. “Aristotle on Natural Slavery: The Race Question.” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, Special Issue on Race in the History of Philosophy, New School University, 2014, pp. 53–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justinian. Digest of Justinian. Translated by Charles Henry Monro. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2014, Book I, vol. 3, p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H. W. “Concerning Seneca’s Exile.” The Classical Journal, vol. 30, no. 2, 1934, pp. 101–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamtakar, Rashama. “Distinction Without a Difference: Race and Genos in Plato.” Philosophers on Race: Critical Essays, edited by Julie K. Ward and Tommie L. Lott. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 2002, pp. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. “On the Different Races of Man or On the Different Races of Human Beings.” This Is Race: An Anthology Selected from the International Literature on the Races of Man, edited by Earl W. Count. New York, NY: Schuman, 1950, pp. 16–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and the Sublime. Translated by John T. Goldthwait. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. “Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals.” Kant’s Ethical Philosophy. Translated by James W. Ellington. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1994, Warner A. Wick, Introduction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel, Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Translated by Hans H. Rudnick and edited by Victor Lyle Dowdell. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. “Of National Characteristics, from Physical Geography.” Race and the Enlightenment, edited by Eze, Chap. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, John. A Letter Concerning Toleration. Latin and English Texts Revised and edited by Mario Montuori. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1963.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, edited by Peter H. Niddich. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975, Book IV, Chap. iii, Sec. 5, pp. 338–40; iii, 27, pp. 414–5; iv, 27, p. 454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, John. Two Treatises of Government, edited by Peter Laslett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, (1689) 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacInnes, C. M. England and Slavery. Bristol: Arrowsmith, 1934, pp. 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst. Systematics and the Origin of Species. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, Thomas. Race, Empire, and the Idea of Human Development. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melzer, Milton. Slavery: A World History. 2 vols. New York, NY: Da Capo Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noonan, John T., Jr. “Development in Moral Doctrine.” The Context of Casuistry, edited by James F. Keenan and Thomas A. Shannon. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1995, pp. 188–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. “Republic.” The Collected Dialogues of Plato, edited by Edith Hamilton and Huntington Cairns and translated by Paul Shorey. New York: Bollingen Foundation, Pantheon Books, Random House, 1964, pp. 575–844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkin, Richard H. “Hume’s Racism.” Philosophical Forum, vol. 9/2, no. 2–3, 1977–1978, pp. 211–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, Michael. Dignity: Its History and Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzgalis, William. “John Locke, Racism, Slavery, and Indian Lands.” Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Race, edited by Naomi Zack. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naomi Zack .

Essay and Discussion Questions

Essay and Discussion Questions

  1. 1.

    Why do you think it’s important to avoid anachronism in discussing ideas resembling race before the modern period?

  2. 2.

    What are the main differences between Plato and Aristotle’s views of who should be enslaved?

  3. 3.

    Do you think Locke’s failure to extend fundamental rights to women, the poor, and non-Europeans means that his political philosophy was not based on his avowed principles of liberty and freedom?

  4. 4.

    What are the implications of the fact that Africans were enslaved before a biological concept of human races were developed?

  5. 5.

    Hume was a polygenist and Kant was a monogenist. Explain how their assessments of racial differences were or were not related to their different beliefs about human origins.

  6. 6.

    Explain and critically evaluate the difference between Kant’s claim that Africans lacked intelligence and reason and that they lacked taste.

  7. 7.

    How did Kant’s reliance on racial essences and Hegel’s on geography influence their views of human races?

  8. 8.

    What are the implications of John Stuart Mill’s restrictions of liberty to Europeans?

  9. 9.

    In what ways was Nietzsche a racialist? Was he also a racist?

  10. 10.

    How might a philosopher’s views on race be relevant to other aspects of that thinker’s work? How are nonracial views held by a philosopher related to that thinkers’ views on race?

Glossary

autonomy

—self-rule, being in charge of one’s own life.

biological racial determinism

—idea that inherited human racial traits determine social, psychological, physical, and cultural traits.

deliberation

—for Aristotle, the intellectual activity of practical wisdom that allows one to practice or develop virtues.

dignitarian

—pertaining to the intrinsic value of human individuals.

essences

—qualities of things that make them what they are and cause their other qualities.

ethnology

—nineteenth-century studies of the history of human cultures that related cultural differences to inherited racial traits.

eugenics

—practice and ideology of improving the quality of humanity by regulating who can have children, and with whom.

identity

—what a person is, naturally or in society.

intrinsic worth (dignity)

—valuable in itself (to itself).

monogenist (ism)

—belief that all human groups, including races, had the same origins.

moral

—adjective connoting human culture, ethics, psychology, and studies thereof.

nominalism

—philosophical doctrine that the distinguishing marks of a certain type of thing or of all types of things are matters of language and human decision and convention, rather than what actually exists in nature or in the external world.

natural kind

—a type of thing that exists on its own in nature, without human invention.

Philosophy of Race

—descriptive and normative philosophical inquiry into racial differences and injustice related to them.

polygenist(ism)

—belief that human groups, especially races, had different origins.

phronesis

—for Aristotle, practical reasoning about how to act.

racialism

—belief that there are human races or that humankind is divided into races.

racism

—negative assessment of some human races and their members, compared to others.

species

—most common division in biological taxonomy; members of a species share its defining traits and can breed amongst themselves but not with members of other species.

systematics

—biological naming and classifying living things as individuals and groups, in relation to one another.

teleology

—determination or causation by an end goal.

thumos

—(Greek) spiritedness.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zack, N. (2018). Ideas of Race in the Canonical History of Philosophy. In: Philosophy of Race. Palgrave Philosophy Today. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78729-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics