Skip to main content

Perineal Trauma and Episiotomy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Medicolegal Issues in Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Abstract

Perineal trauma affects 80% of women during parturition with nearly 50% requiring suturing. All clinicians practicing obstetrics should be trained in accurately diagnosing and classifying perineal trauma and rectal examination is an integral component of management. An episiotomy is a grade 2 perineal tear and is an incision made to enlarge the vaginal outlet to facilitate delivery of the foetus. This should be mediolateral to avoid injury to the anal sphincter. Clear guidance is provided on the indications for an episiotomy and the technique to be adopted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ten Years of Maternity Claims: An Analysis of NHS Litigation Authority Data. ISBN: 978–0–9565019-2-9. http://www.nhsla.com/safety/Documents/Ten%20Years%20of%20Maternity%20Claims%20-%20An%20Analysis%20of%20the%20NHS%20LA%20Data%20-%20October%202012.pdf.

  2. Sultan AH, Thakar R, Fenner D. Perineal and anal sphincter trauma. London: Springer; 2007. p. 13–32.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. RCOG Greentop guideline 29: the management of third and fourth-degree perineal tears: RCOG June 2015, www.rcog.org.uk.

  4. Intrapartum care. National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (2014), [CG190]. London: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg190.

  5. Kalis V, Landsmanova J, Bednarova B, Karbanova J, Laine K, Rokyta Z. Evaluation of the incision angle of mediolateral episiotomy at 60 degrees. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2011;112:220–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. El-Din AS, Kamal MM, Amin MA. Comparison between two incision angles of mediolateral episiotomy in primiparous women: a randomised controlled trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014;40:1877–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Freeman RM, Hollands H, Barron L, Kapoor DS. Cutting a Mediolateral Episiotomy at the Correct Angle: Evaluation of a new device: The Episcissors-60. Med Devices (Auckl). 2014;7:23–8. https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S60056.eCollection2014.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sawant G, Kumar D. Randomized trial comparing episiotomies with Braun-Stadler episiotomy scissors and EPISCISSORS-60(®). Med Devices (Auckl). 2015;8:251–4. https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S83360.eCollection2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Eogan M, Daly L, O’Connell PR, O’Herlihy C. Does the angle of episiotomy affect the incidence of anal sphincter injury? BJOG. 2006;113:190–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stedenfeldt M, Pirhonen J, Blix E, Wilsqaard T, Vonen B, Qian P. Episiotomy characteristics and risks for obstetric anal sphincter injury: a case-control study. BJOG. 2012;119:724–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Evidence Based Guidelines for Midwifery-Led Care in Labour ©The Royal College of Midwives 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sultan AH, Ritchie A, Mooney G. Obstetric anal sphincter injuries: Review of recent medico-legal aspects. Clinical Risk. 2016;0(0):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356262216676131:.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell D, Edozien L, Mahmood T, Adams E, Richmond D, Templeton A, van der Meulen J. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors. BJOG. 2013;120:1516–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Verghese TS, Champaneria R, Kapoor DS, Latthe PM. Obstetric anal sphincter injuries after episiotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(10):1459–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-2956-1. Epub 2016 Feb 19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Jiang H, Qian X, Carroli G, Garner P. Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;(2):CD000081.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Andrews V, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Jones PW. Are mediolateral episiotomies actually mediolateral? BJOG. 2005;112(8):1156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Andrews V, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Jones PW. Occult anal sphincter injuries—myth or reality? BJOG. 2006;113:195–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of Interest

DS Kapoor is a co-inventor of the EPISCISSORS-60 episiotomy scissors. He is a shareholder of MEDINVENT LTD, the company that owns the commercial rights to the scissors.

AH Sultan-none.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdul H. Sultan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kapoor, D.S., Sultan, A.H. (2018). Perineal Trauma and Episiotomy. In: Jha, S., Ferriman, E. (eds) Medicolegal Issues in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78683-4_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78683-4_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78682-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78683-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics