Introduction: Family Policies and the Making of Childcare Arrangements

  • Borbála Kovács


This chapter introduces the focus of the book, explaining and theorising the organisation of young children’s routine care, and locates it within debates regarding work-family reconciliation and family policy analysis in social policy. The chapter reviews competing conceptual propositions linked to explaining childcare decisions at the micro level, emphasising their analytical biases and inherent limitations in light of the focus of the book, thus formulating arguments for the need to theorise childcare decisions from a micro-level perspective. The chapter then expands on the rationales for an empirical approach to the study of families’ childcare decisions and the organisation of young children’s routine care. This is followed by a concise discussion of the literature on the role played by family policies in shaping young families’ care arrangements, perhaps the most important policy instruments in this regard. The chapter ends with a formulation of the book’s main argument and chapter summaries.


  1. Baldock, J., & Hadlow, J. (2004). Managing the family: Productivity, scheduling and the male veto. Social Policy & Administration, 38, 706–720. Scholar
  2. Bettio, F., & Plantenga, J. (2004). Comparing care regimes in Europe. Feminist Economics, 10, 85–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borra, C., & Palma, L. (2009). Child care choices in Spain. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 30, 323–338. Scholar
  4. Crompton, R. (2003). Organisations, careers and caring, family & work series. Bristol: Policy Press for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  5. Debacker, M. (2008). Care strategies among high- and low-skilled mothers: A world of difference? Work, Employment & Society, 22, 527–545. Scholar
  6. Dodson, L. (2007). Wage-poor mothers and moral economy. Social Politics, 14, 258–280. Scholar
  7. Drobnič, S., & Guillén, A. M. (2011). Work-life balance in Europe: The role of job quality, work and welfare in Europe. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Du, F., & Dong, X.-Y. (2013). Women’s employment and child care choices in urban China during the economic transition. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 62, 131–155. Scholar
  9. Duncan, S., & Edwards, R. (1999). Lone mothers, paid work, and gendered moral rationalities. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duncan, S., Edwards, R., Reynolds, T., & Alldred, P. (2003). Motherhood, paid work and partnering: Values and theories. Work, Employment & Society, 17, 309–330. Scholar
  11. Duncan, S., Edwards, R., Reynolds, T., & Alldred, P. (2004). Mothers and child care: Policies, values and theories. Children and Society, 18, 254–265. Scholar
  12. Duvander, A.-Z., & Ellingsæter, A. L. (2016). Cash for childcare schemes in the Nordic welfare states: Diverse paths, diverse outcomes. European Societies, 18, 70–90. Scholar
  13. Ehrenreich, B., & Hochschild, A. R. (2003). Global woman: Nannies, maids and sex workers in the new economy. London: Granta.Google Scholar
  14. Ellingsæter, A. L. (2012). Cash for childcare: Experiences from Finland, Norway and Sweden. International Policy Analysis. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. Accessed on April 18 2018 at
  15. Ellingsæter, A. L., & Gulbrandsen, L. (2007). Closing the childcare gap: The interaction of childcare provision and mothers’ agency in Norway. Journal of Social Policy, 36, 649–669. Scholar
  16. Fram, M. S., & Kim, J. (2008). Race/ethnicity and the start of child care: A multi-level analysis of factors influencing first child care experiences. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 575–590. Scholar
  17. Felfe, C. 2015. Childcare and child development (DICE Rep. No. 13, 16–19). Accessed on April 18 2018 at
  18. Finch, J., Groves, D. (1983). A labour of love: Women, work, and caring. London and Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  19. Folbre, N. (1995). “Holding hands at midnight”: The paradox of caring labor. Feminist Economics, 1, 73–92. Scholar
  20. Folbre, N. (2008). Valuing children: Rethinking the economics of the family, family and public policy. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Goldfeld, S., O’Connor, E., O’Connor, M., Sayers, M., Moore, T., Kvalsvig, A., et al. (2016). The role of preschool in promoting children’s healthy development: Evidence from an Australian population cohort. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 35, 40–48. Scholar
  22. Habibov, N. (2015). On individual, household, and community factors explaining enrollment to early childhood education and care in post-Soviet transitional countries. Child Indicators Research, 8, 825–843. Scholar
  23. Halliday, J., & Little, J. (2001). Amongst women: Exploring the reality of rural childcare. Sociologia Ruralis, 41, 423–437. Scholar
  24. Hansen, K., & Hawkes, D. (2009). Early childcare and child development. Journal of Social Policy, 38, 211–239. Scholar
  25. Himmelweit, S. (2002). Attitudes and caring behaviour: A model with positive feedback. (Working Paper No. 26). ESRC Future of Work Programme. Leeds: University of Leeds.Google Scholar
  26. Himmelweit, S., & Sigala, M. (2004). Choice and the relationship between identities and behaviour for mothers with pre-school children: Some implications for policy from a UK study. Journal of Social Policy, 33, 455–478. Scholar
  27. Hobson, B. (2013). Work-life balance: The agency and capabilities gap. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hobson, B., Fahlén, S., & Takács, J. (2011). Agency and capabilities to achieve a work-life balance: A comparison of Sweden and Hungary. Social Politics, 18, 169–198.Google Scholar
  29. Hochschild, A. R. (1995). The culture of politics: Traditional, postmodern, cold-modern, and warm-modern ideals of care. Social Politics, 2, 331–346. Scholar
  30. Hochschild, A. R. (1997). The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
  31. Hrženjak, M. (2012). Hierarchization and segmentation of informal care markets in Slovenia. Social Politics, 19, 38–57. Scholar
  32. Jenson, J. (2006). The LEGOTM paradigm and new social risks: Consequences for children. In J. Lewis (Ed.), Children, changing families and welfare states (pp. 27–50). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  33. Jenson, J. (2010). Diffusing ideas for after neoliberalism: The social investment perspective in Europe and Latin America. Global Social Policy, 10, 59–84. Scholar
  34. Katras, M. J., Zuiker, V. S., & Bauer, J. W. (2005). Private safety net: Childcare resources from the perspective of rural low-income families. Family Relations, 53, 201–209. Scholar
  35. Kovács, B. (2014). Nannies and informality in Romanian local childcare markets. In J. Morris & A. Polese (Eds.), The informal post-socialist economy: Embedded practices and livelihoods (pp. 67–84). London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Kovács, B. (2015a). “The totality of caring”: Conceptualising childcare arrangements for empirical research. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 35, 699–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kovács, B. (2015b). Managing access to full-time public daycare and preschool services in Romania: Planfulness, cream-skimming and “interventions”. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 6, 6–16. Scholar
  38. Kovács, B. (2016). Socio-economic deficits and informal domestic childcare services in Romania: The policy drivers of the commodification of care from a micro-level perspective. Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, 24, 239–254. Scholar
  39. Kremer, M. (2007). How welfare states care: Culture, gender and parenting in Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Larsen, T. P. (2004). Work and care strategies of European families: Similarities or national differences? Social Policy & Administration, 38, 654–677. Scholar
  41. La Valle, I. (2002). Happy families?: A typical work and its influence on family life. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  42. Leira, A., & Saraceno, C. (2002). Care: Actors, relationships and contexts. In B. Hobson, J. Lewis, & B. Siim (Eds.), Contested concepts in gender and social politics (pp. 55–83). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  43. Leitner, S. (2003). Varieties of familialism: The caring function of the family in comparative perspective. European Societies, 5, 353–375. Scholar
  44. Lendvai, N., & Stubbs, P. (2009). Assemblages, translation, and intermediaries in Southeast Europe: Rethinking transnationalism and social policy. European Societies, 11, 673–695. Scholar
  45. Lister, R., Williams, F., Anttonen, A., Bussemaker, J., Gerhard, U., Heinen, J., et al. (2007). Gendering citizenship in Western Europe: New challenges for citizenship research in a cross-national context. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lewis, J. (Ed.). (2006). Children, changing families and welfare states. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  47. Lokshin, M. (2004). Household childcare choices and women’s work behavior in Russia. The Journal of Human Resources, 39, 1094–1115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lokshin, M., & Fong, M. (2006). Women’s labour force participation and child care in Romania. Journal of Development Studies, 42, 90–109. Scholar
  49. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  50. Mocan, N. (2007). Can consumers detect lemons? An empirical analysis of information asymmetry in the market for child care. Journal of Population Economics, 20, 743–780. Scholar
  51. Morel, N., Palier, B., & Palme, J. (2012). Towards a social investment welfare state?: Ideas, policies and challenges. Bristol: Policy.Google Scholar
  52. Morgan, K. J. (2013). Path shifting of the welfare state: Electoral competition and the expansion of work-family policies in western Europe. World Politics, 65, 73–115. Scholar
  53. Morgan, K. J., & Zippel, K. (2003). Paid to care: The origins and effects of care leave policies in Western Europe. Social Politics, 10, 49–85. Scholar
  54. OECD. (2006). Starting strong II: Early childhood education and care. OECD. Accessed on April 18 2018 at
  55. OECD. (2016a). OECD Family Database—PF3.3: Informal childcare arrangements. OECD. Accessed on January 15 2018 at
  56. OECD. (2016b). OECD Family Database—PF3.2: Enrolment in childcare and pre-school. OECD. Accessed on January 15 2018 at
  57. Peyton, V., Jacobs, A., O’Brien, M., & Roy, C. (2001). Reasons for choosing child care: Associations with family factors, quality, and satisfaction. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 16, 191–208. Scholar
  58. Pfau-Effinger, B. (2005). Welfare state policies and the development of care arrangements. European Societies, 7, 321–347. Scholar
  59. Pfau-Effinger, B. (2011). Family childcare in the cultural and institutional context of European Societies. In Care between work and welfare in European societies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan—RECWOWE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pfau-Effinger, B., & Rostgaard, T. (2011). Care between work and welfare in European societies, work and welfare in Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pungello, E. P., & Kurtz-Costes, B. (2000). Working women’s selection of care for their infants: A prospective study. Family Relations, 49, 245–255. Scholar
  62. Saxonberg, S. (2013). From defamilialization to degenderization: Toward a new welfare typology. Social Policy & Administration, 47, 26–49. Scholar
  63. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Silva, E. B., Smart, C. (1998). The new family? London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  65. Stativă, E., Anghelescu, C. (2004). Studiul Național asupra Educației Timpurii în Creșe—2002 [National study regarding early education in nurseries—2002]. Bucharest: UNICEF with centrul pentru educație și dezvoltare profesională and IOMC.Google Scholar
  66. Stefansen, K., & Farstad, G. R. (2010). Classed parental practices in a modern welfare state: Caring for the under threes in Norway. Critical Social Policy, 30, 120–141. Scholar
  67. Stein, A., Malmberg, L. E., Leach, P., Barnes, J., & Sylva, K. (2013). The influence of different forms of early childcare on children’s emotional and behavioural development at school entry. Child: Care, Health and Development 39.Google Scholar
  68. Szelewa, D., & Polakowski, M. P. (2008). Who cares? Changing patterns of childcare in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 18, 115–131. Scholar
  69. Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  70. Ungerson, C. (1990). The language of care: Crossing the boundaries. In C. Ungerson (Ed.), Gender and caring: Work and welfare in Britain and Scandinavia (pp. 8–33). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  71. Vandenbroeck, M., De Visscher, S., Van Nuffel, K., & Ferla, J. (2008). Mothers’ search for infant child care: The dynamic relationship between availability and desirability in a continental European welfare state. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 245–258. Scholar
  72. Van Kersbergen, K., & Hemerijck, A. (2012). Two decades of change in Europe: The emergence of the social investment state. Journal of Social Policy, 41, 475–492. Scholar
  73. Vincent, C., & Ball, S. J. (2001). A market in love? Choosing pre-school childcare. British Educational Research Journal, 27, 633–651. Scholar
  74. Vincent, C., & Ball, S. J. (2006). Childcare, choice and class practices: Middle class parents and their children. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  75. White, L. A., Prentice, S., & Perlman, M. (2017). The evidence base for early childhood education and care programme investment: What we know, what we don’t know. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 11, 529–546. Scholar
  76. Wheelock, J., Oughton, E., & Baines, S. (2003). Getting by with a little help from your family: Toward a policy-relevant model of the household. Feminist Economics, 9, 19–45. Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark

Personalised recommendations