Advertisement

University Collaboration at a Cross-Road: Evolution and Tensions in Third-Mission Engagement

  • Roger Normann
  • Rómulo Pinheiro
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Global Higher Education book series (PSGHE)

Abstract

In this chapter, we discuss the evolution and tensions of third-mission collaboration in Southern Norway. We follow the unfolding of third-mission engagement through university college mergers and the establishment of a university. Four distinct phases in the evolution of third-mission engagement are identified, and a typology of third-mission roles is developed. Based on this, we ask: How does third-mission engagement evolve, and does it create additional ambiguities in young higher education institutions?

Notes

Acknowledgement

The study which provides the backdrop for this chapter was undertaken under the framework of the research programme entitled ‘Norway Grants’ (2009–2021), funded by the Norwegian Research Council, and focusing on research and capacity building in the so-called new EU countries.

References

  1. Adresseavisen. (2011, January 13). Selger Elkem for 12 milliarder.Google Scholar
  2. Agder University College. (2001). Strategisk plan “Mot år 2006”. Kristiansand: Agder University College.Google Scholar
  3. Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Čábelková, I., Normann, R., & Pinheiro, R. (2017). The role of higher education institutions in fostering industry clusters in peripheral regions: Strategies, actors and outcomes. Higher Education Policy, 30(4), 481–498. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-017-0059-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  6. Enders, J., & Boer, H. (2009). The mission impossible of the European university: Institutional confusion and institutional diversity. In A. Amaral, G. Neave, C. Musselin, & P. Maassen (Eds.), European integration and the governance of higher education and research (Vol. 26, pp. 159–178). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fosse, J. K., & Normann, R. H. (2017). Management strategies in cluster projects—Examples and discussions. In D. Fornahl & R. Hassink (Eds.), The life cycle of clusters a policy perspective (pp. 115–134). Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fædrelandsvennen. (2011, October 19). Elkem permitterer 120.Google Scholar
  9. Fædrelandsvennen. (2013, September 12). Kineserne holder ut.Google Scholar
  10. Goddard, J., Hazelkorn, E., Kempton, L., & Vallance, P. (Eds.). (2016). The civic university: The policy and leadership challenges. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  11. Gulbrandsen, M., & Nerdrum, L. (2009). University-industry relations in Norway. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & B. Verspagen (Eds.), Innovation, path dependency and policy—The Norwegian case (pp. 297–326). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Innst.S.nr.249. (1969–1970). Innstilling om utvida prøvedrift med distriktshøgskoler. Oslo: Kirke- og undervisningsdepartementet.Google Scholar
  13. Johnsen, H. C. G., Normann, R. H., & Pinheiro, R. (2017). Universities’ external relations. In H. C. G. Johnsen, E. S. Hauge, M.-L. Magnussen, & J. R. Ennals (Eds.), Applied social science research in a regional knowledge system: Balancing validity, meaning and convenience (pp. 274–286). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Karlsen, J. (2007). The regional role of the university (Theses at NTNU, 91). Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
  15. KD. (2016). Endringer i finansieringssystemet (changes in hte financial system for higher education institutions) [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www.regjeringen.no/no/tema/utdanning/hoyere-utdanning/innsikt/struktur-i-hoyere-utdanning/endringer-i-finansieringssystemet-for-universiteter-og-hoyskoler/id2416293/
  16. Kyvik, S. (Ed.). (1999). Evaluering av høgskolereformen. Oslo: Norges Forskningsråd.Google Scholar
  17. Kyvik, S. (2002). The merger of non-university colleges in Norway. Higher Education, 44(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1015561027230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Levin, M., & Greenwood, D. J. (2016). Creating a new public university and reviving democracy. Action research in higher education. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
  20. LOV. (1995-05-12-22). Lov om universiteter og høyskoler (universitets- og høyskoleloven). Oslo: Kunnskapsdepartementet.Google Scholar
  21. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  22. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1995). Democratic governance. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  23. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1998). The institutional dynamics of international political order. International Organization, 52, 943–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman, H. J. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 546–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Normann, R. H. (2002). Interruption or continuity? A study of some effects of the reorganization of Finnmark University College and Tromsø University College in 1994. Tromsø: UiT—The Arctic University of Norway.Google Scholar
  27. Normann, R. H. (2007). Democracy in development—A critical view on regional governance, Theses at NTNU nr. 88. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
  28. Normann, R. H. (2015, May 24–27). Path development in rural regions—A case study of innovation policy and local agency in Agder Norway. Paper presented at the Regional Studies Association Annual Conference Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy.Google Scholar
  29. Normann, R. H., Vasström, M., & Johnsen, H. C. G. (2016). The role of agency in regional path development. Paper presented at the Regional Studies Association Annual Conference, 3–6 April, Graz, Austria.Google Scholar
  30. Olsen, J. P. (2007). The institutional dynamics of the European university. In P. Maassen & J. P. Olsen (Eds.), University dynamics and european integration (pp. 25–54). Dordrecht and Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Owen-Smith, J., Riccaboni, M., Pammolli, F., & Powell, W. W. (2002). A Comparison of U.S. and European university-industry relations in the life sciences. Management Science, 48(1), 24–43. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.24.14275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pellizzoni, L. (2001). The myth of the best argument: Power, deliberation and reason. British Journal of Sociology, 52(1), 59–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071310020023037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pierson, P., & Skocpol, T. (2002). Historical institutionalism in contemporary political science. In I. Katznelson & H. Milne (Eds.), Political science the state of the discipline (pp. 693–721). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  34. Pinheiro, R., & Antonowicz, D. (2015). Opening the gates or coping with the flow? Governing access to higher education in Northern and Central Europe. Higher Education, 70(3), 299–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9830-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pinheiro, R., Normann, R., & Johnsen, H. C. G. (2016). External engagement and the academic heartland: The case of a regionally-embedded university. Science and Public Policy, 43(6), 787–797. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scw020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Robertson, S., Mundy, K., & Verger, A. (2012). Public private partnerships in education: New actors and modes of governance in a globalizing world. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. St.prp.nr.136. (1968–1969). Om prøvedrift med distriktshøgskoler. Oslo: Kirke- og undervisningsdepartementet.Google Scholar
  38. Stensaker, B., Aamodt, P., Arnesen, C., Mariussen, Å., Fraas, M., Gulbrandsen, M., … Olsen, T. (2005). OECD thematic review of tertiary education: Country background report for Norway. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/22/55/35585126.pdf; http://www.regjeringen.no/upload/kilde/ufd/rap/2005/0022/ddd/pdfv/277112-oecd_rapport_tertiaryeduc_05_trykketversjon.pdf
  39. Stensaker, B., Persson, M., & Pinheiro, R. (2016). When mergers fail: A case study on the critical role of external stakeholders in merger initiatives. European Journal of Higher Education, 16, 56–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Teknisk Ukeblad. (2011, November 24). Blodbadet er bra for solindustrien.Google Scholar
  41. Trow, M., & Burrage, M. (2010). Twentieth-century higher education: Elite to mass to universal. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  42. University of Agder. (2009). Strategi for Universitetet i Agder 2010–2015. Kristiansand: University of Agder.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.AgderforskningKristiansandNorway
  2. 2.University of AgderKristiansandNorway

Personalised recommendations