The conclusion provides a summary of the main research findings. The explanations of the Chinese nuclear doctrine, which analyse separately international factors, strategic culture, and leaders’ belief systems have several shortcomings. The model used in this work, based on neoclassical realism, consents to solve the puzzles inherent to the studies presented. It combines both international variables and unit-level variables to explain the way a country reacts to international threats/opportunities.
KeywordsNeorealism Neoclassical realism Traditional realism
- Ching, J. (2004). Confucianism and Weapons of Mass Destruction. In S. H. Hashmi & S. P. Lee (Eds.), Ethics and Weapons of Mass Destruction. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Deillos, R. (1994). Chinese Strategic Culture (Centre for East-West Cultural and Economics Studies, Research Paper No. 1 and 2).Google Scholar
- Ivanhoe, P. J. (2004). Heaven’s Mandate’ and the Concept of War in Early Confucianism. In S. H. Hashmi & S. P. Lee (Eds.), Ethics and Weapons of Mass Destruction. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Johnston, A. I. (1995b). Cultural Realism: Strategic Culture and Grand Strategy in Chinese History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Lewis, J. W., & Xue, L. (1988). China Builds the Bomb. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lin, C. P. (1988). China’s Nuclear Weapons Strategy. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar