The International Accounting Convergence Promoted by IASB and FASB Regarding Going Concern Status

  • Marisa Agostini
Chapter

Abstract

The International Accounting Standards Board’s (IASB’s) Framework introduced the “going concern assumption” in 1989 (IASB Framework, Paragraph 23). Today, the first International Accounting Standard (IAS 1, par. 25), turning the going concern framework idea into a requirement, specifies the going concern assumption (IAS 1, par. 25) and precisely identifies the managers’ role (IAS 1, par. 26): management should take into account all available information and consider specific factors (current and expected profitability; debt repayment schedules, including replacement financing; etc.). Starting from the consideration of the international context, this chapter compares the current going concern assumptions as stated by the two sets of standards (International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)) after the issuance of the new US accounting standard in 2014 (about the disclosure of uncertainties relevant to an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern).

Keywords

Accounting convergence process FASB IASB IFRS US GAAP 

Bibliography

  1. Angeloni, S. (2016). Cautiousness on convergence of accounting standards across countries. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 21(2), 246–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barth, M. E., Landsman, W. R., Lang, M., & Williams, C. (2012). Are IFRS-based and US GAAP-based accounting amounts comparable? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 54(1), 68–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burns, T. J., & Coffman, E. N. (1976). The Accounting Hall of Fame: A profile of the members. Journal of Accounting Research, 14, 342–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, K. C., & Church, B. K. (1992). Default on debt obligations and the issuance of going-concern opinions. Auditing, 11(2), 30.Google Scholar
  5. Dicksee, L. (1892). Auditing: A practical manual for auditors. VIII-305. Gee & Co. Pub.Google Scholar
  6. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). (2014). Presentation of financial statements—Going concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of uncertainties about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014–15. Norwalk, CT: Author.Google Scholar
  7. Hahn, W. (2011). The going-concern assumption: Its journey into GAAP. The CPA Journal, 81(2), 26.Google Scholar
  8. Hail, L., Leuz, C., & Wysocki, P. (2010). Global accounting convergence and the potential adoption of IFRS by the US (Part I): Conceptual underpinnings and economic analysis. Accounting Horizons, 24(3), 355–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hatfield, H. R. (1909). Modern accounting, its principles and some of its problems. New York: D. Appleton.Google Scholar
  10. Hatfield, H. R. (1927). Accounting. D. Appleton.Google Scholar
  11. International Accounting Standards Board IASB. (1989, April). Framework for the preparation and presentation of financial statements.Google Scholar
  12. International Accounting Standards Board IASB. IAS 1. Presentation of Financial Statements.Google Scholar
  13. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board IAASB. ISA 570. Going concern basis of accounting.Google Scholar
  14. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board IAASB. ISA 701. Communicating key audit matters in the independent Auditor’s report.Google Scholar
  15. Krishnan, J., & Krishnan, J. (1996). The role of economic trade-offs in the audit opinion decision: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 11(4), 565–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li, X., & Yang, H. I. (2015). Mandatory financial reporting and voluntary disclosure: The effect of mandatory IFRS adoption on management forecasts. The Accounting Review, 91(3), 933–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mitchell, W. C. (1924). Commons on the legal foundations of capitalism. The American Economic Review, 14(2), 240–253.Google Scholar
  18. Ohlgart, C., & Ernst, S. (2011). IFRS: Yes, no, maybe what US companies need to know. Financial Executive, 27(8), 39–44.Google Scholar
  19. Pacter, P. (2014). IFRS as global standards: A pocket guide. London: IFRS Foundation.Google Scholar
  20. Pacter, P. (2016). Pocket guide to IFRS standards: The global financial reporting language. IFRS Foundation.Google Scholar
  21. Rezaee, Z., Smith, L. M., & Szendi, J. Z. (2010). Convergence in accounting standards: Insights from academicians and practitioners. Advances in Accounting, 26(1), 142–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sanders, T. H., Hatfield, H. R., & Moore, U. (1938). A statement of accounting principles. New York: American Institute of Accountants.Google Scholar
  23. Schipper, K. (2005). The introduction of international accounting standards in Europe: Implications for international convergence. European Accounting Review, 14(1), 101–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) No. 59. (AICPA, 1989). The Auditor’s consideration of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.Google Scholar
  25. Storey, R. K. (1959). Revenue realization, going concern and measurement of income. Accounting Review, 34, 232–238.Google Scholar
  26. Wang, C. (2014). Accounting standards harmonization and financial statement comparability: Evidence from transnational information transfer. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(4), 955–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marisa Agostini
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ManagementCa’ Foscari UniversityVeniceItaly

Personalised recommendations