Advertisement

How Marital Status Is Related to Subjective Well-Being and Dispositional Hope

  • Stefanie SpahniEmail author
  • Pasqualina Perrig-Chiello
Chapter
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 72)

Abstract

Having an intimate partner is relevant for individual identity, daily routine, and represents an important source of support, and is thus crucial for well-being. In turn, marital break-up and spousal bereavement are considered as critical life events with a high potential for vulnerabilization. In this chapter we examine how marital status impacts well-being and hope. Using original data from the Swiss Hope-Barometer 2015, we compare married, separated/divorced and widowed individuals regarding various indicators of subjective well-being and show how far they are predicted by dispositional hope, optimism, and social relations. Our results confirm lower life satisfaction in both loss-groups. Separated/divorced individuals further report higher loneliness and depression rates than the married ones. Dispositional hope, optimism and social relations are strong predictors of subjective well-being. They are assumed to be crucial to enable adaptation and sustain health as well as well-being when facing the loss of an intimate relationship.

References

  1. Amato, P. R. (2000). The consequences of divorce for adults and children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1269–1287.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01269.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonanno, G. A. (2008). Loss, trauma, and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, & Policy, S(1), 101–113.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.20 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bryant, F. B., & Cvengros, J. A. (2004). Distinguishing hope and optimism: Two sides of a coin, or two separate coins? Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 273–302.  https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.23.2.273.31018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2014). Dispositional optimism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(6), 293–299.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clark, A. E., Diener, E., Georgellis, Y., & Lucas, R. E. (2008). Lags and leads in life satisfaction: A test of the baseline hypothesis. Economic Journal, 118(529), 222–243.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02150.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 122(1), 155–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gallagher, M. W., & Lopez, S. J. (2009). Positive expectancies and mental health: Identifying the unique contributions of hope and optimism. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 548–556.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760903157166 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goodman, F. R., Disabato, D. J., Kashdan, T. B., & Machell, K. A. (2017). Personality strengths as resilience: A one-year multiwave study. Journal of Personality, 85(3), 423–434.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12250 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Halford, K. W., & Sweeper, S. (2013). Trajectories of adjustment to couple relationship separation. Family Process, 52(2), 228–243.  https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hetherington, E. M. (2003). Intimate pathways: Changing patterns in close personal rela- tionships across time. Family Relations, 52, 318–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holmes, T. H., & Rahe, R. H. (1967). Social readjustment rating scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11(2), 213–218.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999(67)90010-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hughes, M. E., Waite, L. J., Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys: Results from two population-based studies. Research on Aging, 26(6), 655–672.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027504268574 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ingram, R. E., & Luxton, D. D. (2005). Vulnerability-stress models. In B. L. Hankin & J. R. Z. Abela (Eds.), Development of psychopathology: A vulnerability stress perspective (pp. 32–46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Knoepfli, B., Morselli, D., & Perrig-Chiello, P. (2016). Trajectories of psychological adap- tation to marital breakup after long-term marriage. Gerontology, 62, 541–552.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000445056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J., & Löwe, B. (2009). An ultra-brief screening scale for anxiety and depression: The PHQ–4. Psychosomatics, 50, 613.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psy.50.6.613 Google Scholar
  18. Larsen, R. J., & Prizmic, Z. (2008). Regulation of emotional well-being: Overcoming the hedonic treadmill. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 258–289). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  19. Lucas, R. E., Clark, A. E., Georgellis, Y., & Diener, E. (2003). Reexamining adaptation and the set point model of happiness: Reactions to changes in marital status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 527–539.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.527 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Luhmann, M., Hofmann, W., Eid, M., & Lucas, R. E. (2012). Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 592–615.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025948 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Michael, S. T., & Snyder, C. R. (2005). Getting unstuck: The roles of hope, finding meaning, and rumination in the adjustment to bereavement among college students. Death Studies, 29(5), 435–458.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07481180590932544 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Perrig-Chiello, P. (2012). Familienglück – eine zwingende Option? Junge Erwachsene vor der grossen und entscheidenden Frage. In P. Perrig-Chiello, F. Hoepflinger, A. Spillmann, & C. Kuebler (Eds.), Familienglück – Was ist das? (pp. 117–125). Zurich, Switzerland: NZZ Libero.Google Scholar
  23. Perrig-Chiello, P. (2017). Wenn die Liebe nicht mehr jung ist – Warum viele langjährige Partnerschaften zerbrechen und andere nicht. Bern, Switzerland: Hogrefe.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pudrovska, T., & Carr, D. (2008). Psychological adjustment to divorce and widowhood in mid- and later life: Do coping strategies and personality protect against psychological distress? Advances in Life Course Research, 13, 283–317.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-2608(08)00011-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and selfesteem) – A revaluation of the life orientation test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1063–1078.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schumacher, J. (2003). SWLS - satisfaction with life scale. In J. Schumacher, A. Klaiberg, & E. Brähler (Eds.), Diagnostische Verfahren zu Lebensqualität und Wohlbefinden (Diagnostik für Klinik und Praxis, Band 2) (pp. 305–309). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  28. Snyder, C. R., Harris, C., Anderson, J. R., Holleran, S. A., Irving, L. M., Sigmon, S. T., et al. (1991). The will and the ways – Development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(4), 570–585.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.4.570 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Spahni, S., Bennett, K. M., & Perrig-Chiello, P. (2016). Psychological adaptation to spousal bereavement in old age. The role of trait resilience, marital history, and context of death. Death Studies., 40, 182.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2015.1109566 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. ​Spahni, S., Morselli, D., Perrig-Chiello, P., & Bennett, K. M. (2015). Patterns of psychological adaptation to spousal bereavement in old age. Gerontology, 61, 456–468.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000371444 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Springer, K. W., & Hauser, R. M. (2006). An assessment of the construct validity of Ryff’s scales of psychological well-being: Method, mode, and measurement effects. Social Science Research, 35(4), 1080–1102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.07.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stroebe, M. S., Schut, H., & Stroebe, W. (2007). Health outcomes of bereavement. The Lancet, 370(9603), 1960–1973.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61816-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang, H. Y., & Amato, P. R. (2000). Predictors of divorce adjustment: Stressors, resources, and definitions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(3), 655–668.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00655.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2008). Explaining away: A model of affective adaptation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 370–386.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00085.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wittchen, H.-U., & Hoyer, J. (2006). Was ist Klinische Psychologie? Definitionen, Konzepte und Modelle. In H.-U. Wittchen & J. Hoyer (Eds.), Klinische Psychologie & Psychotherapie (2nd ed., pp. 3–25). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Psychology, Developmental PsychologyUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations