Advertisement

Rapid Coverage of Regions of Interest for Environmental Monitoring

  • Nantawat PinkamEmail author
  • Abdullah Al Redwan Newaz
  • Sungmoon Jeong
  • Nak Young Chong
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 751)

Abstract

In this paper, we present a framework to solve the problem of rapidly determining regions of interest (ROIs) from an unknown intensity distribution, especially in radiation fields. The vast majority of existing literature on robotics area coverage does not report the identification of ROIs. In a radiation field, ROIs limit the range of exploration to mitigate the monitoring problem. However, considering the limited resources of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) as a mobile measurement system, it is challenging to determine ROIs in unknown radiation fields. Given the target area, we attempt to plan a path that facilitates the localization of ROIs with a single UAV, while minimizing the exploration cost. To reduce the complexity of exploration of large scale environment, initially whole areas are adaptively decomposed by the hierarchical method based on Voronoi based subdivision. Once an informative decomposed sub area is selected by maximizing a utility function, the robot heuristically reaches to contaminated areas and then a boundary estimation algorithm is adopted to estimate the environmental boundaries. Finally, the detailed boundaries are approximated by ellipses, called the ROIs of the target area and whole procedures are iterated to sequentially cover the all areas. The simulation results demonstrate that our framework allows a single UAV to efficiently and explore a given target area to maximize the localization rate of ROIs.

Keywords

Environmental monitoring Regions of interest coverage Energy-efficient path planning UAV 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Ministry of Education, Culture, Sport, Science and Technology (MEXT) - Japan, for the financial support through MEXT scholarship. In addition, this work was supported by the Industrial Convergence Core Technology Development Program (No. 10063172) funded by MOTIE, Korea.

References

  1. 1.
    Acar, E.U., Choset, H., Lee, J.Y.: Sensor-based coverage with extended range detectors. IEEE Trans. Robot. 22, 189–198 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Acar, E.U., Choset, H., Zhang, Y., Schervish, M.: Path planning for robotic demining: robust sensor-based coverage of unstructured environments and probabilistic methods. Int. J. Robot. Res. 22(7–8), 441–466 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Choset, H.: Coverage for robotics—a survey of recent results. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 31(1–4), 113–126 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dames, P., Kumar, V.: Autonomous localization of an unknown number of targets without data association using teams of mobile sensors. IEEE Trans. Automat. Sci. Eng. 12, 850–864 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Galceran, E., Carreras, M.: A survey on coverage path planning for robotics. Robot. Autonom. Syst. 61, 1258–1276 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guillen-Climent, M.L., Zarco-Tejada, P.J., Berni, J.A.J., North, P.R.J., Villalobos, F.J.: Mapping radiation interception in row-structured orchards using 3d simulation and high-resolution airborne imagery acquired from a uav. Precision Agri. 13, 473–500 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Han, J., Xu, Y., Di, L., Chen, Y.: Low-cost multi-uav technologies for contour mapping of nuclear radiation field. J. Intelligen. Robot. Syst. 70, 401–410 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lahijanian, M., Maly, M.R., Fried, D., Kavraki, L.E., Kress-gazit, H., Member, S., Vardi, M.Y.: Environ. Partial Satisfact. Guarant. 32(3), 583–599 (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Matveev, A.S., Hoy, M.C., Ovchinnikov, K., Anisimov, A., Savkin, A.V.: Robot navigation for monitoring unsteady environmental boundaries without field gradient estimation. Automatica 62, 227–235 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mitchell, D., Chakraborty, N., Sycara, K., Michael, N.: Multi-robot persistent coverage with stochastic task costs. In: IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 3401–3406 (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Paull, L., Seto, M., Li, H.: Area coverage planning that accounts for pose uncertainty with an AUV seabed surveying application. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation pp. 6592–6599 (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Paull, L., Thibault, C., Nagaty, A., Seto, M., Li, H.: Sensor-driven area coverage for an autonomous fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicle. IEEE Trans. Cybernet. 44, 1605–1618 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Soltero, D.E., Schwager, M., Rus, D.: Decentralized path planning for coverage tasks using gradient descent adaptive control. Int. J. Robot. Res. 33, 401–425 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Strimel, G.P., Veloso, M.M.: Coverage planning with finite resources. In: IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 2950–2956 (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xu, L.: Graph Planning for Environmental Coverage. Carnegie Mellon University, p. 135 Aug. 2011Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yehoshua, R., Agmon, N., Kaminka, G.A.: Robotic adversarial coverage of known environments. Int. J. Robot. Res. 1–26 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nantawat Pinkam
    • 1
    Email author
  • Abdullah Al Redwan Newaz
    • 2
  • Sungmoon Jeong
    • 1
  • Nak Young Chong
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Information ScienceJapan Advanced Institute of Science and TechnologyIshikawaJapan
  2. 2.Graduate School of Information ScienceNagoya UniversityNagoyaJapan

Personalised recommendations