Skip to main content

Computed Tomography and Gross Anatomy of the Abdominal Wall (Including Planes for Mesh Hernia Repair)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The SAGES Manual of Hernia Surgery

Abstract

A comprehensive understanding of abdominal wall anatomy, both gross and radiographic, is essential for any surgeon who plans to perform ventral herniorrhaphy. As the volume and complexity of ventral hernias increase, hernia surgeons must be well versed in the correlation of physical exam findings with imaging study findings to most effectively plan for operative intervention. This chapter provides a focused review of gross anatomy for hernia surgeons. It also reviews the importance of computed tomography imaging in the diagnosis and surgical management of ventral hernias and provides images and identifies key findings on interpretation. Finally, it describes the major classification systems of hernia location and mesh implantation to improve communication and research among surgeons who perform ventral herniorrhaphy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Poulose BK, Shelton J, Phillips S, Moore D, Nealon W, Penson D, Beck W, Holzman MD. Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research. Hernia. 2012;16(2):179–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lovering RM, Anderson LD. Architecture and fiber type of the pyramidalis muscle. Anat Sci Int. 2008;83(4):294–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tonolini M. Multidetector CT of expected findings and complications after contemporary inguinal hernia repair surgery. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2016;22(5):422–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldblatt MI. Potential for ultrasonography to reduce the cost and cumulative radiation dose in routine incisional hernias. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(6):596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baucom RB, Beck WC, Phillips SE, Holzman MD, Sharp KW, Nealon WH, Poulose BK. Comparative evaluation of dynamic abdominal sonography for hernia and computed tomography for characterization of incisional hernia. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(6):591–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Muysoms FE, Miserez M, Berrevoet F, Campanelli G, Champault GG, Chelala E, Dietz UA, Eker HH, El Nakadi I, Hauters P, Hidalgo Pascual M, Hoeferlin A, Klinge U, Montgomery A, Simmermacher RK, Simons MP, Smietański M, Sommeling C, Tollens T, Vierendeels T, Kingsnorth A. Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias. Hernia. 2009;13(4):407–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chevrel JP, Rath AM. Classification of incisional hernias of the abdominal wall. Hernia. 2000;4:7–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Korenkov M, Paul A, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E, Arndt M, Chevrel JP, Corcione F, Fingerhut A, Flament JB, Kux M, Matzinger A, Myrvold HE, Rath AM, Simmermacher RK. Classification and surgical treatment of incisional hernia. Results of an experts’ meeting. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2001;386(1):65–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dietz UA, Hamelmann W, Winkler MS, Debus ES, Malafaia O, Czeczko NG, Thiede A, Kuhfuss I. An alternative classification of incisional hernias enlisting morphology, body type and risk factors in the assessment of prognosis and tailoring of surgical technique. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(4):383–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ammaturo C, Bassi G. The ratio between anterior abdominal wall surface/wall defect surface: a new parameter to classify abdominal incisional hernias. Hernia. 2005;9(4):316–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Muysoms F, Campanelli G, Champault GG, DeBeaux AC, Dietz UA, Jeekel J, Klinge U, Köckerling F, Mandala V, Montgomery A, Morales Conde S, Puppe F, Simmermacher RK, Śmietański M, Miserez M. EuraHS: the development of an international online platform for registration and outcome measurement of ventral abdominal wall hernia repair. Hernia. 2012;16(3):239–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Baucom RB, Beck WC, Holzman MD, Sharp KW, Nealon WH, Poulose BK. Prospective evaluation of surgeon physical examination for detection of incisional hernias. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218(3):363–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rakic S, LeBlanc KA. The radiologic appearance of prosthetic materials used in hernia repair and a recommended classification. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201(6):1180–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Blair LJ, Ross SW, Huntington CR, Watkins JD, Prasad T, Lincourt AE, Augenstein VA, Heniford BT. Computed tomographic measurements predict component separation in ventral hernia repair. J Surg Res. 2015;199(2):420–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Franklin BR, Patel KM, Nahabedian MY, Baldassari LE, Cohen EI, Bhanot P. Predicting abdominal closure after component separation for complex ventral hernias: maximizing the use of preoperative computed tomography. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;71(3):261–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wormer BA, Walters AL, Bradley JF III, Williams KB, Tsirline VB, Augenstein VA, Heniford BT. Does ventral hernia defect length, width, or area predict postoperative quality of life? Answers from a prospective, international study. J Surg Res. 2013;184(1):169–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Holihan JL, Karanjawala B, Ko A, Askenasy EP, Matta EJ, Gharbaoui L, Hasapes JP, Tammisetti VS, Thupili CR, Alawadi ZM, Bondre I, Flores-Gonzalez JR, Kao LS, Liang MK. Use of computed tomography in diagnosing ventral hernia recurrence: a blinded, prospective, multispecialty evaluation. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(1):7–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosenkrantz AB, Bansal NK. Diagnostic errors in abdominopelvic CT interpretation: characterization based on report addenda. Abdom Radiol. 2016;41(9):1793–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pauli EM, Rosen MJ. Open ventral hernia repair with component separation. Surg Clin North Am. 2013;93(5):1111–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Strâmbu V, Radu P, Brătucu M, Garofil D, Iorga C, Iorga R, Popa F. Rives technique, a gold standard for incisional hernias—our experience. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2013;108(1):46–50.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Parker SG, Wood CPJ, Sanders DL, Windsor ACJ. Nomenclature in abdominal wall hernias: is it time for consensus? World J Surg. 2017;41(10):2488–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Muysoms F, Jacob B. International hernia collaboration consensus on nomenclature of abdominal wall hernia repair. World J Surg. 2018;42(1):302–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Brown CN, Finch JG. Which mesh for hernia repair? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010;92(4):272–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Parra JA, Revuelta S, Gallego T, Bueno J, Berrio JI, Fariñas MC. Prosthetic mesh used for inguinal and ventral hernia repair: normal appearance and complications in ultrasound and CT. Br J Radiol. 2004;77(915):261–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fischer T, Ladurner R, Gangkofer A, Mussack T, Reiser M, Lienemann A. Functional cine MRI of the abdomen for the assessment of implanted synthetic mesh in patients after incisional hernia repair: initial results. Eur Radiol. 2007;17(12):3123–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric M. Pauli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: CT Atlas

Appendix: CT Atlas

  1. 1.

    Wrinkled coated heavyweight polypropylene mesh (intermittently visible) is best identified where it is in contact with preperitoneal fat and as a result of the wrinkles from mesh contracture.

  2. 2.

    Thin expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh (small arrow), recurrent hernia in the midline (large arrow), and laparoscopic tacks (opaque dots).

  3. 3.

    Onlay mesh easily visible above the anterior rectus sheath due to interposed fat between the mesh and the fascia as well as by the presence of skin staples that were used to secure the mesh.

  4. 4.

    Laparoscopically placed left inguinal hernia mesh (lightweight polypropylene) visualized by fat density surrounding the mesh as well as by the metal tacks used to secure it.

  5. 5.

    Retromuscular polyethylene poorly visualized when in contact with the rectus muscle but that are visualized when adjacent to preperitoneal fat. Metal clips within the posterior sheet also hint as to the location in which dissection has occurred.

  6. 6.

    Heavyweight mesh visible on the abdominal wall and seen free floating in the abdominal cavity after failed ventral incisional hernia repair.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Juza, R.M., Pauli, E.M. (2019). Computed Tomography and Gross Anatomy of the Abdominal Wall (Including Planes for Mesh Hernia Repair). In: Davis, Jr., S., Dakin, G., Bates, A. (eds) The SAGES Manual of Hernia Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78411-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78411-3_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78410-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78411-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics