Advertisement

Thomas Hobbes and Fear: The Political Use of a Human Emotion

  • Sergio Starkstein
Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

Hobbes’s Leviathan is among the first philosophical texts to provide a systematic argument concerning the crucial role of fear in shaping social institutions, and to examine how this emotion may be manipulated for social control. Hobbes’s political ‘remedy’ for social chaos is the establishment of a powerful sovereign capable of enforcing a strong political system by using the fear of social punishment. It is argued that Hobbes’s political construction does not help to reduce human fears, since it basically consists in a strong state allegedly able to reduce anxiety to ‘tolerable’ levels, but in which the ‘horizon of expectations’ is stabilised by fear.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aeschylus. (1961). Prometheus bound and other plays (P. Vellacott, Trans.). London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
  2. Ahrensdorf, P. J. (2000). The fear of death and the longing for immortality: Hobbes and Thucydides on human nature and the problem of anarchy. American Political Science Review, 94(3), 579–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bagby, L. M. J. (2009). Thomas Hobbes: Turning point for honor. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  4. Blits, J. H. (1989). Hobbesian fear. Political Theory, 17(3), 417–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bodei, R. (1995). Geometría de las Pasiones, Miedo, Esperanza, Felicidad: Filosofía y uso Político. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
  6. Cooper, J. E. (2010). Vainglory, modesty, and political agency in the political theory of Thomas Hobbes. The Review of Politics, 72, 241–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ginzburg, C. (2008). Fear, reverence, terror: Reading Hobbes today. San Domenico di Fiesole: European University Institute.Google Scholar
  8. Gold, R., & Pearce, J. (2015). Ferox or Fortis: Montaigne, Hobbes, and the perils of paradiastole. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 48(2), 186–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harrison, R. (2003). Hobbes, Locke, and confusion’s masterpiece: An examination of seventeenth-century political philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hobbes, T. (1889). The elements of law natural and politic (F. Tönnies, Ed.). London: Elibron Classics.Google Scholar
  11. Hobbes, T. (1972). Man and citizen (Thomas Hobbes’s De Homine and De Cive) (B. Gert, Ed.). New York: Humanities Press. Google Scholar
  12. Hobbes, T. (1994). Human nature and De Corpore Politico (J. C. A. Gaskin, Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hobbes, T. (1996). Leviathan (J. C. A. Gaskin, Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Johnston, D. (1986). The rhetoric of Leviathan: Thomas Hobbes and the politics of cultural transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kavka, G. S. (1986). Hobbesian moral and political theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Martinich, A. P. (1999). Hobbes: A biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Merton, R. K. (1938). Technology and society in seveteenth century England. Osiris, 4, 360–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Michaelis, L. (2007). Hobbes’s modern Prometheus: A political philosophy for an uncertain future. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 40(1), 101–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mintz, S. I. (1970). The hunting of Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Mitchell, S. (1987). The book of job (S. Mitchell, Trans.). Pymble: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Montaigne, M. (2003). The complete essays (M. A. Screech, Trans.). London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  22. Newey, G. (2014). The Routledge guidebook to Hobbes’ Leviathan. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Olsthoorn, J. (2014). Worse than death: The non-preservationist foundations of Hobbes’s moral philosophy. Hobbes Studies, 27, 148–170.Google Scholar
  24. Pettit, P. (2008). Made with words: Hobbes on language, mind, and politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Robin, C. (2004). Fear: The history of a political idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Schochet, G. J. (1967). Thomas Hobbes on the family and the state of nature. Political Science Quarterly, 82(3), 427–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Springborg, P. (2007). The Cambridge companion to Hobbes Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Strauss, L. (1963). The political philosophy of Hobbes: Its basis and its genesis (E. Sinclair, Trans.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  29. Vasalle, A. (2010). Prometheus bound: Curiosity and anxiety for the future time in Hobbes’ Leviathan. Humana-Mente, 12, 23–42.Google Scholar
  30. Zagorin, P. (2009). Hobbes and the law of nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Western AustraliaFremantleAustralia

Personalised recommendations

Cite chapter

Buy options