Deaths in the Family

Chapter

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to evaluate the relative strengths of economic and social status in determining deaths in households in India. The first part of the chapter focuses on the “age at death” using National Sample Survey data for 2004 and 2014. The purpose was to ask whether after controlling for non-community factors, the fact that Indians belonged to different social groups, encapsulating different degrees of social status, exercised a significant influence on their age at death? The existence of a social group effect would suggest that there was a “social gradient” to health outcomes in India. The second part of the chapter, using data from the Indian Human Development Survey of 2011, investigated the determinants of infant and child mortality. The overriding concern now is gender bias with girls more likely to die than boys before attaining their first (infant) and fifth (child) birthdays. As this study has shown, gender bias in infant and child mortality rates is, with singular exceptions, a feature of all the social groups. In conducting this investigation, the chapter addresses for India an issue which lies at the heart of social epidemiology: estimating the relative strengths of individual and social factors in determining mortality outcomes.

References

  1. Birdi, K., Warr, P., & Oswald, A. (1995). Age Differences in Three Components of Employee Well-Being. Applied Psychology, 44, 345–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Black, D., Morris, J., Smith, C., & Townsend, P. (1980). Inequalities in Health: A Report of a Research Working Group. London: Department of Health and Social Security.Google Scholar
  3. Bongaarts, J., & Guilmoto, C. Z. (2015). How Many More Missing Women? Excess Female Mortality and Prenatal Sex Selection, 1970–2050. Population and Development Review, 41, 241–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borooah, V. K. (2000). The Welfare of Children in Central India: Econometric Analysis and Policy Simulation. Oxford Development Studies, 28, 263–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borooah, V. K. (2003). Births, Infants and Children: An Econometric Portrait of Women and Children in India. Development and Change, 34, 67–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borooah, V. K. (2004). Gender Bias among Children in India in their Diet and Immunisation Against Disease. Social Science and Medicine, 58, 1719–1731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borooah, V. K., & Iyer, S. (2005). Religion, Literacy, and the Female-to-Male Ratio. Economic and Political Weekly, 60, 419–428.Google Scholar
  8. Borooah, V. K., Dubey, A., & Iyer, S. (2007). The Effectiveness of Jobs Reservation: Caste, Religion, and Economic Status in India. Development and Change, 38, 423–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bose, A. (2001). Demographic Data: Overflow and Non-Ultilisation. Economic and Political Weekly, 36, 4176–4179.Google Scholar
  10. Brunner, E., & Marmot, M. (1999). Social Organisation, Stress and Health. In M. Marmot & R. Wilkinson (Eds.), The Social Determinants of Health (pp. 17–43). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Caldwell, J. C. (1979). Education as a Factor in Mortality Decline: An Examination of Nigerian Data. Population Studies, 33, 395–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caldwell, J. C. (1986). Routes to Low Mortality in Poor Countries. Population and Development Review, 12, 171–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. CIA. (2015). The World Factbook. Langley, VA: Central Intelligence Agency.Google Scholar
  14. Desai, S., Dubey, A., & Vanneman, R. (2015). India Human Development Survey-II, University of Maryland and National Council of Applied Economic Research, New Delhi. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
  15. Dreze, J., & Sen, A. K. (1996). Economic Development and Social Opportunity. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Epstein, H. (1998). Life and Death on the Social Ladder. The New York Review of Books, XLV, 26–30.Google Scholar
  17. Griffin, J. M., Fuhrer, R., Stansfeld, S. A., & Marmot, M. (2002). The Importance of Low Control at Work and Home on Depression and Anxiety: Do These Effects Vary by Gender and Social Class. Social Science and Medicine, 54, 783–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guha, R. (2007). Adivasis, Naxalities, and Indian Democracy. Economic and Political Weekly, 42, 3305–3312.Google Scholar
  19. Hobcraft, J. (1993). Women’s Education, Child Welfare and Child Survival: A Review of the Evidence. Health Transition Review, 3, 159–173.Google Scholar
  20. Jeffery, R., & Basu, A. M. (Eds.). (1996). Girls’ Schooling, Women’s Autonomy and Fertility Change in South Asia. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Karasek, R., & Marmot, M. (1996). Refining Social Class: Psychosocial Job Factors, Chapter Presented at The Fourth International Congress of Behavioral Medicine, Washington, DC, March 13–16.Google Scholar
  22. León-Cava, N., Lutter, C., Ross, J., & Martin, L. (2002). Quantifying the Benefits of Breast Feeding: A Summary of the Evidence. Washington, DC: Pan American Health Organization.Google Scholar
  23. Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2014). Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  24. Marmot, M. (1986). Does Stress Cause Heart Attacks. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 62, 683–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marmot, M. (2000). Multilevel Approaches to Understanding Social Determinants. In L. Berkman & I. Kawachi (Eds.), Social Epidemiology (pp. 349–367). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Marmot, M. (2004). Status Syndrome: How Our Position on the Social Gradient Affects Longevity and Health. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  27. Murthi, M., Guio, A.-C., & Dreze, J. (1995). Mortality, Fertility and Gender Bias in India. Population and Development Review, 34, 745–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mustafa, H. E., & Odimegwu, C. (2008). Socioeconomic Determinants of Infant Mortality in Kenya: Analysis of Kenya DHS 2003. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2, 1–16.Google Scholar
  29. Parikh, K., & Gupta, C. (2001). How Effective is Female Literacy in Reducing Fertility? Economic and Political Weekly, XXXVI, 3391–3398.Google Scholar
  30. Puffer, R. R., & Serrano, C. V. (1975), Birthweight, Maternal Age, and Birth Order: Three Important Determinants of Infant Mortality (Scientific Publication No. 294). Washington, DC: Pan American Health Organization.Google Scholar
  31. Sen, A. K. (2001). The Many Faces of Gender Inequality. Frontline, 18: 27 October –9 November.Google Scholar
  32. Sen, G., Iyer, A., & George, A. (2007). Systematic Hierarchies and Systemic Failures: Gender and Health Inequalities in Koppal District. Economic and Political Weekly, 42, 682–690.Google Scholar
  33. Sengupta, J., & Sarkar, D. (2007). Discrimination in Ethnically Fragmented Localities. Economic and Political Weekly, 42, 3313–3322.Google Scholar
  34. Shariff, A. (1999). India Human Development Report. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Subbarao, K., & Rainey, L. (1992). Social Gains from Female Education: A Cross-National Study (Policy Research Working Chapters WPS 1045). Washington, DC: Population and Human Resources Department, World Bank.Google Scholar
  36. Tendulkar, S. (2007). National Sample Surveys. In K. Basu (Ed.), The Oxford Companion to Economics in India (pp. 367–370). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Theil, H. (1954). Linear Aggregation of Economic Relations. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  38. Trivedi, A., & Timmons, H. (2013). India’s Man Problem. The New York Times, https://india.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/16/indias-man-problem/?_r=0&login=email. Accessed 18 May 2017.
  39. Wilkinson, R. G., & Marmot, M. (1998). Social Determinants of Health: The Solid Facts. Copenhagen: World Health Organisation Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar
  40. Woodbury, R. M. (1925). Causal Factors in Infant Mortality: A Statistical Study Based on Investigations in Eight Cities (Children’s Bureau Publications No. 142). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Applied EconomicsUniversity of UlsterBelfastUK

Personalised recommendations