The Health of Elderly Persons

  • Vani Kant Borooah


This chapter uses data from India’s National Sample Survey (NSS), relating to respondents’ health outcomes between January and June 2014, to quantify a particular form of gender inequality: inequality in self-rated health (SRH) outcomes between men and women aged 60 years or over. In so doing, it makes five contributions to the existing literature. The first is in terms of analytical technique: this study contains a more detailed and nuanced exposition of the regression results than in previous studies. Second, it controls for environmental factors—such as poor drainage, absence of toilets or lack of ventilation in the kitchen—which might adversely impact on health and, in particular, affect the health of women more than that of men. Third, it takes account of interaction effects by which the effect of a variable on an elderly person’s SRH differed according to whether the person was male or female. Lastly, it examines whether SRH is correlated with objective health outcomes. In particular, this study answers two central questions. Did men and women, considered collectively, have significantly different likelihoods of “poor” SRH between the different regions/income classes/social groups/education levels? Did men and women, considered separately, have significantly different likelihoods of a “poor” SRH within a region/income class/social group/education level?


  1. Agewell. (2015). Gender Discrimination Among Older Women in India. New Delhi: Agewell Foundation.
  2. Alam, M. (2006). Ageing in India: Socio-Economic and Health Dimensions. New Delhi: Academic Foundation.Google Scholar
  3. Batra, A., Gupta, I., & Mukhopadhya, A. (2014). Does Discrimination Drive Gender Differences in Health Expenditure on Adults: Evidence from Cancer Patients in Rural India (Discussion Papers in Economics, 14-03). New Delhi: Indian Statistical Institute.Google Scholar
  4. Bertrand, R. M., & Willis, S. L. (1999). Everyday Problem Solving in Alzheimer’s Patients (A Comparison of Subjective and Objective Assessments). Aging & Mental Health, 3, 281–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Black, D., Morris, J., Smith, C., & Townsend, P. (1980). Inequalities in Health: A Report of a Research Working Group. London: Department of Health and Social Security.Google Scholar
  6. Borooah, V. K. (2002). Logit and Probit: Ordered and Multinomial Models. Quantitative Studies in the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borooah, V. K. (2005). The Height-for-Age of Indian Children. Economics and Human Biology, 3, 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cramm, J. M., Bornscheuer, L., Selivanova, A., & Lee, J. (2015). The Health of India’s Elderly Population: A Comparative Assessment Using Subjective and Objective Health Outcomes. Population Ageing, 8, 245–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Detering, K. M., Hancock, A. D., Reade, M. C., & Silvester, W. (2010). The Impact of Advance Care Planning on End of Life Care in Elderly Patients: Randomised Controlled Trial. British Medical Journal, 340, c1345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Epstein, H. (1998). Life and Death on the Social Ladder. The New York Review of Books, XLV, 26–30.Google Scholar
  11. Fuchs, V. R. (1999). Health Care for the Elderly: How Much? Who Will Pay for It? Health Affairs, 18(1), 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goverover, Y., Kalmar, J., Gaudino-Goering, E., Shawaryn, M., Moore, N. B., Halper, J., et al. (2005). The Relation Between Subjective and Objective Measures of Everyday Life Activities in Persons with Multiple Sclerosis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86(12), 2303–2308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Idler, E. L., & Benyamini, Y. (1997). Self-Rated Health and Mortality: A Review of Twenty-Seven Community Studies. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 38(1), 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnson, P., Balakrishnan, K., Ramaswamy, P., Ghosh, S., Sadhavisam, M., & Abriami, O. (2011). Prevalence of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Rural Women of Tamil Nadu. Global Health Action, 4, 72226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kalavar, J. M., & Jamuna, D. (2011). Aging of Indian Women in India: The Experience of Older Women in Formal Care Homes. Journal of Women & Aging, 23, 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kankaria, A., Nongkynrih, B., & Gupta, S. K. (2014). Indoor Air Pollution in India: Implications for Health and Its Control. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 39(4), 203–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Newton, T. L. (2001). Marriage and Health: His and Hers. Psychological Bulletin, 127(4), 472–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2014). Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  19. Maddox, G. L., & Douglass, E. B. (1973). Self-Assessment of Health: A Longitudinal Study of Elderly Subjects. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 14(1), 87–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marmot, M. (2000). Multilevel Approaches to Understanding Social Determinants. In L. Berkman & I. Kawachi (Eds.), Social Epidemiology (pp. 349–367). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Menon, N. (2009). Aren’t OBC Women ‘Women’? Loud Thinking on the Women’s Reservation Bill. Accessed on 5 August 2016.
  22. Mishra, S., Joseph, R. A., Gupta, P. C., Pezzack, B., Ram, F., Sinha, D. N., Dikshit, R., Patra, J., & Jha, P. (2016). Trends in Bidi and Cigarette Smoking in India from 1988 to 2015, by Age, Gender, and Education. BMJ Global Health, 1, e000005. Scholar
  23. Patel, V., & Prince, M. (2011). Ageing and Mental Health in a Developing Country: Who Cares? Qualitative Studies from Goa, India. Psychological Medicine, 31, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Robles, T. F., Slatcher, R. B., Trombello, J. M., & McGinn, M. M. (2014). Marital Quality and Health: A Meta-Analytic Review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(1), 140–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sachar Committee Report. (2006). The Social and Economic Status of the Muslim Community in India. Government of India (Cabinet Secretariat): New Delhi.Google Scholar
  26. Sager, M. A., Dunham, N. C., Schwantes, A., Mecum, L., Halverson, K., & Harlowe, D. (1992). Measurement of Activities of Daily Living in Hospitalized Elderly (A Comparison of Self-Report and Performance-Based Methods). Journal of American Geriatrics Society, 40, 457–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sanders, A. B. (1992). Care of the Elderly in Emergency Departments: Conclusions and Recommendations. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 21(7), 830–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sen, A. K. (2001). The Many Faces of Gender Inequality. Frontline, 18, 27 October–9 November.Google Scholar
  29. Sen, A. K. (2002). Health: Perception Versus Observation. British Medical Journal, 324(7342), 860–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sengupta, M., & Agree, E. M. (2002). Gender and Disability Among Older Adults in North and South India: Differences Associated with Co-residence and Marriage. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 17, 313–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shah, N. (2004). Oral Health Care System for Elderly in INDIA. Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 4(S): s162–s164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Singh, L., Arokiasamy, P., Singh, P. K., & Rai, R. K. (2013). Determinants of Gender Differences in Self-Rated Health Among Older Population: Evidence from India. Sage Open, 3(April–June): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Umberson, D. (1992). Gender, Marital Status, and the Social Control of Health Behaviour. Social Science and Medicine, 24, 907–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. United Nations Population Division. (2015). World Population Prospects: Key Findings and Advance Tables. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations.Google Scholar
  35. Yabroff, K. R., Lamont, E. B., Mariotto, A. L., Warren, J. L., Topor, M., Meekins, A., et al. (2008). Cost of Care for Elderly Cancer Patients in the United States. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 100(9), 630–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ziebarth, N. (2011). Measurement of Health, Health Inequality, and Reporting Heterogeneity. Social Science and Medicine, 71(1), 116–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Applied EconomicsUniversity of UlsterBelfastUK

Personalised recommendations