Skip to main content

Measurement Imperatives and Their Impact: Academic Staff Narratives on Riding the Metric Tide

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Higher education (HE) is in the grip of an unprecedented level of attention to quantitative performance indicators. Measurement imperatives are positioned in policy discourses as key to the generation of market competition and institutional differentiation. But beyond government policymakers, many are sceptical about their use and value, particularly in relation to enhancing knowledge, improving pedagogic relationships and developing learning communities. This chapter explores five academics’ narratives—each in different institutional roles—of their personal responses to measurement imperatives; and utilises C. Wright Mills’ (1959) notion of the sociological imagination to trace how individual narratives intersect with broader discourses of marketisation, equity and differentiation. These five staff narratives bring to the fore what matters to them as academics, in their relationships with students and colleagues, and how they navigate the performative discourses and practices which shape their working lives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ashwin, P. (2017). Making sense of the Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF) results. Centre for Global Higher Education. http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/86901/1/making_sense_of_the_tef.pdf. Accessed 1 Oct 2017.

  • Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R., & Kane, S. (2014). Students’ interpretations of the meanings of questionnaire items in the National Student Survey. Quality in Higher Education, 20(2), 129–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boliver, V. (2016). Lies, damned lies, and widening access to Russell Group universities. Radical Statistics, 114, 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 399–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, A. (2014). UK Engagement Survey 2014 the second pilot year. York: Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (2013). Why do market ‘reforms’ persistently increase inequality? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(2), 279–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R. (2001). Globalism, new managerialism, academic capitalism and entrepreneurialism in universities: Is the local dimension important? Comparative Education, 37(1), 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2014). A thousand plateaus – Capitalism and schizophrenia. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. (2016). Success as a knowledge economy: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, A., Vorley, T., Roberts, J., & Jones, S. (2012). Behavioural approaches to understanding student choice. York: Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, M. S., Bransford, J. D., & Pellegrino, J. W. (1999). How people learn: Bridging research and practice. Available online at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/9457.html. Accessed 1 Mar 2017.

  • Egginton, W. (2016). Comfort conservatism and humanities education. Available online at: http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=9457. Accessed 1 Oct 2017.

  • Fielding, M. (2001). Students as radical agents of change. Journal of Educational Change, 2, 123–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1998). The history of sexuality (Vol. 1). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1994). Pedagogy of hope: Reliving pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (2003). Public pedagogy and the politics of resistance: Notes on a critical theory of educational struggle. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 35(1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, C. (2012). Cultivating flourishing lives: A robust social justice vision of education. American Educational Research Journal, 49(5), 910–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris-Evans, J. (2017). A homage to services lost, risk, young people and outdoor education (Unpublished EdD thesis). Sheffield Hallam University.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, b. (2003). Teaching Community: A pedagogy of hope. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, R. (2000). Disenchantment, enchantment and re-enchantment: Max Weber at the millennium. Max Weber Studies, 1, 11–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerrim, J. (2011). Do UK higher education students overestimate their starting salary? Fiscal Studies – The Journal of Applied Public Economics, 32(4), 483–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladson-Billings, G. (2013). “Stakes is high”: Educating new century students. The Journal of Negro Education, 82(2), 105–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacAllister, J. (2016). What should educational institutions be for? British Journal of Educational Studies, 64(3), 375–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (2013). How Aristotelianism can become revolutionary: Ethics, resistance and utopia. In P. Blackledge & K. Knight (Eds.), Virtue and politics: Alasdair MacIntyre’s revolutionary Aristotelianism. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madriaga, M., & Goodley, D. (2010). Moving beyond the minimum: Socially just pedagogies and Asperger’s syndrome in UK higher education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(2), 115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNay, I. (2015). Learning from the UK Research Excellence Framework: Ends and means in research quality assessment, and the reliability of results in education. Higher Education Review, 47(3), 24–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo, R. (2011). Rethinking development: Education and the new imperialism. In R. Kong, S. Marginson, & R. Naidoo (Eds.), Handbook on globalization and higher education (pp. 40–59). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo, R., & Whitty, G. (2014). Students as consumers: Commodifying or democratising learning? International Journal of Chinese Education, 2(2), 212–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NatCen Social Research. (2014). Review of the National Student Survey. London: Institute of Education/NatCen/Institute for Employment Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pusser, B., & Marginson, S. (2013). University rankings in critical perspective. Journal of Higher Education, 84(4), 544–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, J. (1999). Disagreement: Politics and philosophy. Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, A. (2011). Why things matter to people. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sclater, N., Peasgood, A., & Mullan, J. (2016). Learning analytics in higher education: A review of UK and international practice. Bristol: JISC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellar, S. (2013). Equity, markets and the politics of aspiration in Australian higher education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(2), 245–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standing, G. (2011). The precariat – The new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C., & Bovill, C. (2017). Towards an ecology of participation: Process philosophy and co-creation of higher education curricula. European Education Research Journal. Published Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904117704102. Accessed 1 Oct 2017.

  • Taylor, C., & Harris-Evans, J. (2016). Reconceptualising transition to higher education with Deleuze and Guattari. Studies in Higher Education. Published online https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1242567. Accessed 1 Mar 2017.

  • Taylor, C., & McCaig, C. (2014). Evaluating the impact of number controls, choice and competition: An analysis of the student profile and the student learning environment in the new higher education landscape. York: HEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M. (2014). Five recommendations for using alternative metrics in the future UK Research Excellence Framework. Impact of Social Sciences Blog.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unison. (2016). The damage – A future at risk, cuts in youth services. London: Unison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, S. (2014). When you’re smiling: Exploring how teachers motivate and engage learners in the further education sector. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 38(3), 346–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilsdon, J. (2015). The metric tide: Report of the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/rereports/Year/2015/metrictide/. Accessed 1 Oct 2017.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carol Taylor .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Taylor, C., Harris-Evans, J., Garner, I., Fitzgerald, D., Madriaga, M. (2018). Measurement Imperatives and Their Impact: Academic Staff Narratives on Riding the Metric Tide. In: Bowl, M., McCaig, C., Hughes, J. (eds) Equality and Differentiation in Marketised Higher Education. Palgrave Studies in Excellence and Equity in Global Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78313-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78313-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78312-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78313-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics