Abstract
Higher education (HE) is in the grip of an unprecedented level of attention to quantitative performance indicators. Measurement imperatives are positioned in policy discourses as key to the generation of market competition and institutional differentiation. But beyond government policymakers, many are sceptical about their use and value, particularly in relation to enhancing knowledge, improving pedagogic relationships and developing learning communities. This chapter explores five academics’ narratives—each in different institutional roles—of their personal responses to measurement imperatives; and utilises C. Wright Mills’ (1959) notion of the sociological imagination to trace how individual narratives intersect with broader discourses of marketisation, equity and differentiation. These five staff narratives bring to the fore what matters to them as academics, in their relationships with students and colleagues, and how they navigate the performative discourses and practices which shape their working lives.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Ashwin, P. (2017). Making sense of the Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF) results. Centre for Global Higher Education. http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/86901/1/making_sense_of_the_tef.pdf. Accessed 1 Oct 2017.
Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.
Bennett, R., & Kane, S. (2014). Students’ interpretations of the meanings of questionnaire items in the National Student Survey. Quality in Higher Education, 20(2), 129–164.
Boliver, V. (2016). Lies, damned lies, and widening access to Russell Group universities. Radical Statistics, 114, 29–38.
Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 399–413.
Buckley, A. (2014). UK Engagement Survey 2014 the second pilot year. York: Higher Education Academy.
Connell, R. (2013). Why do market ‘reforms’ persistently increase inequality? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(2), 279–285.
Deem, R. (2001). Globalism, new managerialism, academic capitalism and entrepreneurialism in universities: Is the local dimension important? Comparative Education, 37(1), 7–20.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2014). A thousand plateaus – Capitalism and schizophrenia. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. (2016). Success as a knowledge economy: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.
Diamond, A., Vorley, T., Roberts, J., & Jones, S. (2012). Behavioural approaches to understanding student choice. York: Higher Education Academy.
Donovan, M. S., Bransford, J. D., & Pellegrino, J. W. (1999). How people learn: Bridging research and practice. Available online at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/9457.html. Accessed 1 Mar 2017.
Egginton, W. (2016). Comfort conservatism and humanities education. Available online at: http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=9457. Accessed 1 Oct 2017.
Fielding, M. (2001). Students as radical agents of change. Journal of Educational Change, 2, 123–141.
Foucault, M. (1998). The history of sexuality (Vol. 1). London: Penguin.
Freire, P. (1994). Pedagogy of hope: Reliving pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Continuum.
Giroux, H. (2003). Public pedagogy and the politics of resistance: Notes on a critical theory of educational struggle. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 35(1), 5–16.
Grant, C. (2012). Cultivating flourishing lives: A robust social justice vision of education. American Educational Research Journal, 49(5), 910–934.
Harris-Evans, J. (2017). A homage to services lost, risk, young people and outdoor education (Unpublished EdD thesis). Sheffield Hallam University.
hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. London: Routledge.
hooks, b. (2003). Teaching Community: A pedagogy of hope. New York: Routledge.
Jenkins, R. (2000). Disenchantment, enchantment and re-enchantment: Max Weber at the millennium. Max Weber Studies, 1, 11–32.
Jerrim, J. (2011). Do UK higher education students overestimate their starting salary? Fiscal Studies – The Journal of Applied Public Economics, 32(4), 483–509.
Ladson-Billings, G. (2013). “Stakes is high”: Educating new century students. The Journal of Negro Education, 82(2), 105–110.
Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225–248.
MacAllister, J. (2016). What should educational institutions be for? British Journal of Educational Studies, 64(3), 375–391.
MacIntyre, A. (2013). How Aristotelianism can become revolutionary: Ethics, resistance and utopia. In P. Blackledge & K. Knight (Eds.), Virtue and politics: Alasdair MacIntyre’s revolutionary Aristotelianism. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Madriaga, M., & Goodley, D. (2010). Moving beyond the minimum: Socially just pedagogies and Asperger’s syndrome in UK higher education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(2), 115–131.
McNay, I. (2015). Learning from the UK Research Excellence Framework: Ends and means in research quality assessment, and the reliability of results in education. Higher Education Review, 47(3), 24–47.
Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Naidoo, R. (2011). Rethinking development: Education and the new imperialism. In R. Kong, S. Marginson, & R. Naidoo (Eds.), Handbook on globalization and higher education (pp. 40–59). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Naidoo, R., & Whitty, G. (2014). Students as consumers: Commodifying or democratising learning? International Journal of Chinese Education, 2(2), 212–240.
NatCen Social Research. (2014). Review of the National Student Survey. London: Institute of Education/NatCen/Institute for Employment Studies.
Pusser, B., & Marginson, S. (2013). University rankings in critical perspective. Journal of Higher Education, 84(4), 544–568.
Rancière, J. (1999). Disagreement: Politics and philosophy. Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press.
Sayer, A. (2011). Why things matter to people. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sclater, N., Peasgood, A., & Mullan, J. (2016). Learning analytics in higher education: A review of UK and international practice. Bristol: JISC.
Sellar, S. (2013). Equity, markets and the politics of aspiration in Australian higher education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(2), 245–258.
Standing, G. (2011). The precariat – The new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Taylor, C., & Bovill, C. (2017). Towards an ecology of participation: Process philosophy and co-creation of higher education curricula. European Education Research Journal. Published Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904117704102. Accessed 1 Oct 2017.
Taylor, C., & Harris-Evans, J. (2016). Reconceptualising transition to higher education with Deleuze and Guattari. Studies in Higher Education. Published online https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1242567. Accessed 1 Mar 2017.
Taylor, C., & McCaig, C. (2014). Evaluating the impact of number controls, choice and competition: An analysis of the student profile and the student learning environment in the new higher education landscape. York: HEA.
Thelwall, M. (2014). Five recommendations for using alternative metrics in the future UK Research Excellence Framework. Impact of Social Sciences Blog.
Unison. (2016). The damage – A future at risk, cuts in youth services. London: Unison.
Wallace, S. (2014). When you’re smiling: Exploring how teachers motivate and engage learners in the further education sector. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 38(3), 346–360.
Wilsdon, J. (2015). The metric tide: Report of the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/rereports/Year/2015/metrictide/. Accessed 1 Oct 2017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Taylor, C., Harris-Evans, J., Garner, I., Fitzgerald, D., Madriaga, M. (2018). Measurement Imperatives and Their Impact: Academic Staff Narratives on Riding the Metric Tide. In: Bowl, M., McCaig, C., Hughes, J. (eds) Equality and Differentiation in Marketised Higher Education. Palgrave Studies in Excellence and Equity in Global Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78313-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78313-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78312-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78313-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)