Skip to main content

Creating Spaces for Learning: Online Forums

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Building on The Open University’s longstanding use of forums for teaching and learning, the chapter begins with a general consideration of their use, most notably acknowledging one of the core perceived ‘problems’ with forums: participation. The chapter then discusses the ‘structural’ and ‘functional’ concerns that are related to the use of forums as spaces for learning, using a series of case studies of forum design and use in order to illustrate how a concern with structure and function can facilitate productive forum use. The chapter moves on to highlight broad principles which hold true across different technologies and institutions. Before concluding with suggestions for colleagues engaging with forums, based on the preceding analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We refer to ‘blended’ learning environments in terms of its more popular usage, i.e. the combination of traditional face-to-face learning activities with online (Oliver and Trigwell 2005), but equally acknowledge ongoing debate around the utility of the term ‘blended learning’ (e.g. Irvine et al. 2013).

References

  • Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, M. A. (2009). Asynchronous discussion forums: Success factors, outcomes, assessments, and limitations. Educational Technology and Society, 12(1), 249–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balaji, M. S., & Chakrabarti, D. (2010). Student interactions in online discussion forum: Empirical research from “media richness theory” perspective. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, J., & Haycock, J. (2014). Roles and student identities in online large course forums: Implications for practice. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(1), 20–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayne, S. (2005). Deceit, desire and control: The identities of learners and teachers in cyberspace. In R. Land & S. Bayne (Eds.), Education in cyberspace (pp. 21–41). Abingdon: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bederson, B. B., Russell, D. M., & Klemmer, S. (2015). Introduction to online learning at scale. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 22(2), 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burston, M. A. (2016). I work and don’t have time for that theory stuff: Time poverty and higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education (online first). https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2015.1135885

  • Choi, I., Land, S. M., & Turgeon, A. J. (2005). Scaffolding peer-questioning strategies to facilitate metacognition during online small group discussion. Instructional Science, 33, 483–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conole, G., Dyke, M., Oliver, M., & Seale, J. (2004). Mapping pedagogy and tools for effective learning design. Computers and Education, 43(1–2), 17–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De George-Walker, L., & Keeffe, M. (2010). Self-determined blended learning: A case study of blended learning design. Higher Education Research and Development, 29(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360903277380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennen, V. (2008). Pedagogical lurking: Student engagement in non-posting discussion behaviour. Computers in Human Behaviour, 24(4), 1624–1633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P., Järvelä, S., & Fischer, F. (2009). The evolution of research on computer supported collaborative learning: From design to orchestration. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. de Jong, A. de Lazonder, & S. Barnes (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning: Principles and products (pp. 3–19). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, M., & Scarborough, H. (2001). Enhancing the learning environment for distance education students. Distance Education, 22(2), 232–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groves, M., & O’Donoghue, J. (2009). Reflections of students in their use of asynchronous online seminars. Educational Technology and Society, 12(3), 143–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haycock, J. (2008). Making first class impressions. Paper presented at the 3rd open CETL conference: Building bridges, The Open University, Milton Keynes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2012). Student participation in online discussions: Challenges, solutions and future research. New York: Springer Science+Business Media.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning: A study of asynchronous and synchronous e-learning methods discovered that each supports different purposes. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 31(4), 51–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hülsmann, T. (2009). Access and efficiency in the development of distance education and E-learning. In U. Bernath, A. Szücs, A. Tait, & M. Vidal (Eds.), Distance and E-learning in transition (pp. 119–140). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, V., Code, J., & Richards, L. (2013). Realigning higher education for the 21st century learner through multi-access learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D., McNaught, C., Chong, F., & Cheng, K. (2010). Understanding the ways in which design features of educational websites impact upon student learning outcomes in blended learning environments. Computers and Education, 55(3), 1183–1192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D., Park, Y., Yoon, M., & Jo, I. H. (2016). Toward evidence-based learning analytics: Using proxy variables to improve asynchronous online discussion environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 30, 30–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kop, R. (2011). The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: Learning experiences during a massive open online course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 19–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Magjuka, R. J., Bonk, C. J., & Lee, S. H. (2007). Does sense of community matter. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(1), 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M., & Trigwell, K. (2005). Can ‘blended learning’ be redeemed? E-learning, 2(1), 17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, S., Holt, D., & Bray, S. (2008). Does the discussion help? The impact of a formally assessed online discussion of final student results. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 847–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, R., & Benfield, G. (2005). The student experience of E-learning in higher education: A review of the literature. Brookes eJournal of Learning and Teaching, 1(3), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1). http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm.

  • Smith, D. (2016). Looking behind the headlines: Participation in assessed collaborative forums and implications for assessment. International conference of education, research and innovation, Seville, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D., & Smith, K. (2014). The case for ‘Passive’ learning – The ‘silent’ community of online learners. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 17(2), 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D., & Smith, K. (2015). Understanding passive learning in online distance education. International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, Seville, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuopala, E. M., Hyvönen, P., & Järvelä, S. (2016). Interaction forms in successful collaborative learning in virtual learning environments. Active Learning in Higher Education. Epub ahead of print 30 November 2015. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787415616730.

  • Wallace, P. (2016). The psychology of the internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisskirch, R. S., & Milburn, S. S. (2003). Virtual discussion: Understanding college students’ electronic bulletin board use. The Internet and Higher Education, 6(3), 215–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller, M. (2011). The digital scholar: How technology is transforming academic practice, Bloomsbury Open Access. https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/book/the-digital-scholar-how-technology-is-transforming-scholarly-practice/

  • Zhou, M., & Chua, B. L. (2016). Using blended learning design to enhance learning experience in teacher education. International Journal on E-Learning, 15(1), 121–140. Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donna Smith .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Manning, R., Smith, D. (2018). Creating Spaces for Learning: Online Forums. In: Baxter, J., Callaghan, G., McAvoy, J. (eds) Creativity and Critique in Online Learning. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78298-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78298-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78297-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78298-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics