Abstract
In this paper, we draw on data from a longitudinal study of mathematics engagement during adult-child joint activity at home. Drawing from across case and within case analysis of 44 videotaped activities, gathered in 6 middle class homes over 2 years, this paper provides evidence of either Instruction or Construction being predominate in each activity. Examination of one Instruction (i.e., Play-Doh pizza) and one Construction activity (i.e., family photos) suggests each activity shared common characteristics, but there were also distinct characteristics pertaining to concepts, control, and interactions. We discuss two considerations (i.e., blending across experiences and valuing big ideas) to stimulate further reflection and research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Acar Bayraktar, E. (2013). The discernment into the interactional niche in the development of mathematical thinking (NMT) in the familial context. In B. Ubuz, C. Haser, & M. Mariotti (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 2078–2087). Ankara, Turkey: Middle East Technical University.
Anderson, A. (1997). Families and mathematics: A study of parent-child interactions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 484–511.
Anderson, A., & Anderson, J. (1995). Learning mathematics through children’s literature: A case study. Canadian Journal of Research in Early Childhood Education, 4, 1–9.
Anderson, A., & Anderson, J. (2014). Parent-child mathematics: A study of mothers’ choices. In C. Nicol, P. Liljedahl, S. Oesterle, & D. Allan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education and the 36th Conference of the North American Chapter of the Psychology Of Mathematics Education (Volume II, pp. 33–38). Vancouver: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
Anderson, A., Anderson, J., & Shapiro, J. (2004). Mathematical discourse in storybook reading. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35, 5–33.
Anderson, A., Anderson, J., & Shapiro, J. (2005). Supporting multiliteracies: Parents’ and children’s talk within shared storybook reading. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 16, 5–26.
Aubrey, C., Bottle, G., & Godfrey, R. (2003). Early mathematics in the home and out-of-home contexts. International Journal of Early Years Education, 11(2), 91–103.
Benz, C., Brandt, B., Kortenkamp, U., Krummheur, G., Ladel, S., & Vogel, R. (2014). Introduction. In U. Kortenkamp, B. Brandt, C. Benz, G. Krummheuer, S. Ladel, & R. Vogel (Eds.), Early mathematics learning: Selected papers of the POEM 2012 conference (pp. 3–7). New York: Springer.
Brandt, B., & Tiedemann, K. (2010). Learning mathematics within family discourses. In V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergne, & F. Arzarello (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 2557–2566). Lyon, France: Institut National de Recherche Pédagogique.
British Columbia’s New Curriculum: Mathematics, Ministry of Education: Victoria BC. www.curriculum.gov.bc.ca
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiment by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (Ed.). (2005). Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Clements, D., & Sarama, J. (2009). Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories aproach. New York: Routledge.
Copley, J. (2004). Showcasing mathematics for the young child: Activities for three-, four-, and five-year-olds. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
DeVries, E., Thomas, L., & Warren, E. (2010). Teaching mathematics and play-based learning in an indigenous early childhood setting: Early childhood teachers’ perspectives. In L. Sparrow, B. Kissane, & C. Hurst (Eds.), Shaping the future of mathematics education: Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 719–722). Fermantle: MERGA.
Helenius, O., Johansson, M., Lange, T., Meaney, T., Riesbeck, E., & Wernberg, A. (2016). When is young children’s play mathematical? In T. Meaney, O. Helenius, M. Johansson, T. Lange, & A. Wernberg (Eds.), Mathematics education in the early years: Results from the POEM2 conference, 2014 (pp. 139–156). New York: Springer.
Helenius, O., Johansson, M., Lange, T., Meaney, T., & Wernberg, A. (2016). Introduction. In T. Meaney, O. Helenius, M. Johansson, T. Lange, & A. Wernberg (Eds.), Mathematics education in the early years: Results from the POEM2 conference, 2014 (pp. 3–17). New York: Springer.
Hunting, R. (2010). Little people, big play, and big mathematical ideas. In L. Sparrow, B. Kissane, & C. Hurst (Eds.), Shaping the future of mathematics education: Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 727–730). Fermantle: MERGA.
Kortenkamp, U., Brandt, B., Benz, C., Krummheuer, G., Ladel, S., & Vogel, R. (2014). Early mathematics learning: Selected papers of the POEM 2012 conference. New York: Springer.
Krummheuer, G. (2012). The “non-canonical” solution and the “improvisation” as conditions for early years mathematics learning processes: The concept of the “Interactional Niche in the development of Mathematical Thinking” (NMT). Journal for Mathematik-Didaktik, 33(2), 317–338.
Krummheuer, G. (2014). The relationship between cultural expectation and the local realization of a mathematics learning environment. In U. Kortenkamp, B. Brandt, C. Benz, G. Krummheuer, S. Ladel, & R. Vogel (Eds.), Early mathematics learning: Selected papers of the POEM 2012 conference (pp. 71–83). New York: Springer.
Meaney, T., Helenius, O., Johansson, M., Lange, T., & Wernberg, A. (2016). Mathematics education in the early years: Results from the POEM2 conference, 2014. New York: Springer.
Moffatt, L., Anderson, A., Anderson, J., & Shapiro, J. (2009). Gender and mathematics at play: Parents’ constructions of their pre-schoolers’ mathematical capabilities. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 2, 1–25.
Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. AMC, 10, 12.
Presmeg, N. (2014). A dance of instruction with construction in Mathematics Education. In U. Kortenkamp, B. Brandt, C. Benz, G. Krummheuer, S. Ladel, & R. Vogel (Eds.), Early Mathematics Learning: Selected papers of the POEM 2012 conference (pp. 9–17). New York: Springer.
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Sherman-LeVos, J. (2010). Numeracy: Mathematics instruction for preschoolers. Encyclopedia on Early Childhood Development, pp. 1–4. Centre of Excellence for Early Childhood Development (CEECD) & Strategic Knowledge Cluster on Early Child Development (SKC-ECD), University of Montreal & University of Laval, Quebec, Canada. www.child-encyclopedia.com/numeracy/according-experts/mathematics-instruction-preschoolers
Solmaz, G. (2015). Familial studies in early childhood that involve mathematical situations. In K. Kraimer & N. Vondrova (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 1996–2002). Prague: Czech Republic.
Tiedemann, K. (2013). How families support the learning of early years mathematics. In B. Ubuz, C. Haser, & M. Mariotti (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eight Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 2218–2227). Ankara, Turkey: Middle East Technical University.
Tiedemann, K., & Brandt, B. (2010). Parents’ support in mathematical discourses. In U. Gellert, E. Jablonka, & C. Morgan (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Mathematics Education and Society Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 457–466). Germany: Freie Universitat Berling.
Vygotsky, L. (1968). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Walkerdine, V. (1988). The mastery of reason: Cognitive development and the production of rationality. London: Routledge.
Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix A
Appendix A
Pizza Activity
The Adam mother and her preschooler are seated at adjacent sides of the child’s table. Once the mother assists her daughter in getting a “lump” of Play-Doh onto the table, the child begins to roll a wooden dowel onto it. When the Adam mother asks what the child plans to make, she answers pizza. At times, the mother helps flatten the dough to make it easier for the roller and converses with her daughter as the child concentrates on rolling out the pizza. Initially the mother asks what shape she is trying to make (“what’s the shape of a Pizza?”) and the daughter responds (“triangle”) in such a way that the mother qualifies it (“when it is sliced”) before turning their attention to cutting the pizza to share with friends who visit. As the episode unfolds, the child is encouraged to cut the circular Play-Doh pizza into equal-sized slices for various numbers of imagined visitors. The mother’s questions ensue about the number of pieces and on occasion about whether the sizes are fair (“same size for each visitor”) while the child makes the cuts and counts the slices (Fig. A.1).
NOTE: As the mother repeatedly asked math (number) related questions, explicitly directed the child’s actions for cutting equal pieces, redirected the child’s attention to the problems being posed, and maintained a focus on a mathematical goal, the tenor of the session was deemed Instruction.
Photos Activity
The Pimm grandmother and her preschool granddaughter sit side by side on the edge of the child’s bed, with large sheets of paper on the floor or bed near them. Multiple photos of various family members, captured in groups or alone, with or without other props, have been printed on these sheets. The grandmother holds one sheet at a time, at a slight angle while resting the bottom edge on her lap, so as to be readily visible to her and the child. The child is able to point to, and readily touch, most of the photos. The Pimm mother is behind the camera and videotaping the conversation between the grandmother and her preschooler. She comments on one occasion only, although the child is seen looking in the direction of the camera (her mother) on a few occasions typically when the grandmother speaks of the mother’s (Eema) presence in the photos. The grandmother shares varied information about selected photos and those captured, asks the child questions, answers the child’s questions, and at times expands on the child’s statements (Fig. A.2). In the latter third of the session, the older sibling joins her grandmother and sister, and all three continue to view and talk about the family photos together.
NOTE: As the grandmother repeatedly identifies the persons in the pictures, providing details about relationships to each other and the child, sharing short stories of related events, interweaving math-related terms on occasion when quantity, age or size were invoked to describe the photo, the tenor of the session was deemed Construction
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Anderson, A., Anderson, J. (2018). Instruction and Construction of Mathematics at Home: An Exploratory Study. In: Benz, C., Steinweg, A., Gasteiger, H., Schöner, P., Vollmuth, H., Zöllner, J. (eds) Mathematics Education in the Early Years. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78220-1_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78220-1_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78219-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78220-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)