Mechanical Characterization of Polymer Nanocomposites Reinforced with Graphene Nanoplatelets

  • Ugur Kilic
  • Sherif M. Daghash
  • Osman E. Ozbulut
Conference paper


Fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) composites have been extensively used for strengthening concrete structures. To manufacture FRPs or bond them to concrete structures, usually thermoset polymers are used. The mechanical properties and integrity of these adhesives significantly affect the performance of FRP-strengthened structures. Graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) are carbon-based functional fillers that possess large surface area and high aspect ratio. They are easy to be processed in the host matrix and have excellent material properties at a relatively low cost. This study investigates the tensile behavior of GNP-reinforced nanocomposites. Two different epoxy matrices, one ductile and another brittle, are considered. First, the effect of ultrasonication duration in dispersion of GNPs is studied. Then, specimens with different GNP concentration levels are prepared to assess the effect of GNP content on the developed nanocomposites. Monotonic uniaxial tensile tests are conducted to study the effect of GNP addition to tensile strength and tensile modulus of two different epoxy resins. Morphology of GNPs and the fracture surface of the developed nanocomposites are also observed using SEM to assess the dispersion of GNPs. Results shows that both tensile strength and tensile modulus of ductile epoxy increase with increasing GNP content up to 1 wt. %, while for brittle epoxy a significant increase in tensile modulus is observed with 2 wt. % GNP concentration together with a slight decrease in tensile strength.


  1. 1.
    Shokrieh, M., Esmkhani, M., Shahverdi, H. R., & Vahedi, F. (2013). Effect of graphene nanosheets (GNS) and graphite nanoplatelets (GNP) on the mechanical properties of epoxy nanocomposites. Science of Advanced Materials, 5(3), 260–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Xu, M., Futaba, D. N., Yamada, T., Yumura, M., & Hata, K. (2010). Carbon nanotubes with temperature-invariant viscoelasticity from –196 °C to 1000 °C. Science, 330(6009), 1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Geim, A. K. (2009). Graphene: Status and prospects. Science, 324(5934), 1530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sengupta, R., Bhattacharya, M., Bandyopadhyay, S., & Bhowmick, A. K. (2011). A review on the mechanical and electrical properties of graphite and modified graphite reinforced polymer composites. Progress in Polymer Science, 36(5), 638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chatterjee, S., Nafezarefi, F., Tai, N. H., Schlagenhauf, L., Nuesch, F. A., Chu, B. T. T., Thostenson, E. T., Ren, Z., & Chou, T.-W. (2012). Size and synergy effects of nanofiller hybrids including graphene nanoplatelets and carbon nanotubes in mechanical properties of epoxy composites (2001) Advances in the science and technology of carbon nanotubes and their composites: a review. Composites Science and Technology, 61(13), 1899–1912.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coleman, J., Khan, U., & Gun’ko, Y. (2006). Mechanical reinforcement of polymers using carbon nanotubes. Advanced Materials, 18, 689–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee, C., Wei, X., Kysar, J. W., & Hone, J. (2008). Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science, 321, 385–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Balandin, A. A., Ghosh, S., Bao, W., Calizo, I., Teweldebrhan, D., Miao, F., & Lau, C. N. (2008). Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene. Nano Letters, 8(3), 902–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    ASTM D638 – Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ugur Kilic
    • 1
  • Sherif M. Daghash
    • 1
  • Osman E. Ozbulut
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations