A Comparative Study on Colloidal Nanosilica Incorporation in Polymer-Modified Cement Mortars

  • Niloufar Zabihi
  • M. Hulusi Özkul
Conference paper


Nanosilica and polymers are both well-known admixtures of cementitious mixtures, changing their properties differently upon employment. However, having them incorporated simultaneously, and their possible interactions in the mixtures, is yet to be studied. In this research, mortar mixtures, modified by one type of polymer latex (Styrene butadiene acetate) and two types of nanosilica colloids (different average particle sizes), were investigated for their flowability and long-term mechanical properties. Interesting observations were made in both fresh and hardened state; in the fresh state, the high water demand of nanosilica incorporating mixtures was moderated at the presence of the polymer, and in the hardened state, improvements were observed, especially in terms of flexural strength. Mortar mixtures were produced with different amounts of polymer and colloidal nanosilica, and, accordingly, numerical analyses and simulations have been conducted to model and gain a better understanding of the investigated properties.


Latex-modified mortars Polymer concrete Nanosilica Flowability Mechanical properties 


  1. 1.
    Belkowitz, J. S., & Armentrout, D. (2010). An investigation of nano silica in the cement hydration process. In 2010 concrete sustainability conference. Dubai.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berra, M., Carassiti, F., Mangialardi, T., Paolini, A. E., & Sebastiani, M. (2012). Effects of nanosilica addition on workability and compressive strength of Portland cement pastes. Construction and Building Materials, 35, 666–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Quercia, G., & Brouwers, H. J. H. (2010). Application of nano-silica (nS) in concrete mixtures (pp. 431–436). Lyngby: 8th fib international Ph. D. symposium in Civil Engineering.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Quercia, G., Hüsken, G., & Brouwers, H. J. H. (2012). Water demand of amorphous nano silica and its impact on the workability of cement paste. Cement and Concrete Research, 42(2), 344–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Said, A. M., Zeidan, M. S., Bassuoni, M. T., & Tian, Y. (2012). Properties of concrete incorporating nano-silica. Construction and Building Materials, 36, 838–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Senff, L., Labrincha, J. A., Ferreira, V. M., Hotza, D., & Repette, W. L. (2009). Effect of nano-silica on rheology and fresh properties of cement pastes and mortars. Construction and Building Materials, 23(7), 2487–2491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zabihi, N., Ozkul, M. H., Parlak, N., & Özer, B. (2016). The hydration properties of nanosilica-polymer- Portland cement composites. In 12th international congress on advances in Civil Engineering (ACE2016). Istanbul.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    ACI Committee 548. (2003). Polymer-modified concrete. Farmington Hills: American Concrete Institute.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuhlmann, L. A., & Walters, D. G. (1993). Polymer-modified hydraulic-cement mixtures. Philadelphia: ASTM Special Technical Publication.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miller, M. (2008). Polymers in cementitious materials. Smithers Rapra Press, Shawbury, UK.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morin, V., Moevus, M., Dubois-Brugger, I., & Gartner, E. (2011). Effect of polymer modification of the paste–aggregate interface on the mechanical properties of concretes. Cement and Concrete Research, 41(5), 459–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ohama, Y. (1995). Handbook of polymer-modified concrete and mortars: Properties and process technology. Norwich: William Andrew.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ramli, M., & Tabassi, A. A. (2012). Effects of polymer modification on the permeability of cement mortars under different curing conditions: A correlational study that includes pore distributions, water absorption and compressive strength. Construction and Building Materials, 28(1), 561–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Van Gemert, D., & Beeldens, A. (2013). Evolution in modeling cement hydration and polymer hardening in polymer-cement concrete. Advanced Materials Research, 687, 291–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zeng, S., Short, N. R., & Page, C. L. (1996). Early-age hydration kinetics of polymer-modified cement. Advances in Cement Research, 8(29), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    ASTM, C. (2008). 230, Standard specification for flow table for use in tests of hydraulic cement. West Conshohocken: ASTM International.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hinkelmann, K., & Kempthorne, O. (2008). Design and analysis of experiments. In Introduction to experimental design (Vol. 1). New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    ASTM, C. (2012). 109, StandardTest Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50-mm] Cube Specimens). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    ASTM, C. (2014). 348, Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Hydraulic-Cement Mortars. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Building Materials Laboratory, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations