Microstructural and Strength Investigation of Geopolymer Concrete with Natural Pozzolan and Micro Silica

  • Muhammed Kalimur Rahman
  • Mohammed Ibrahim
  • Luai M. Al-Hems
Conference paper

Abstract

In pursuit of finding sustainable building material, geopolymer concrete is developed utilizing aluminosilicate materials such as fly ash. Silica and alumina are the main precursors of alkali activation. The amount of silica and alumina in the source materials plays a significant role in the strength and microstructural development of such a concrete. If the source materials are supplemented by the addition of these precursors, the properties can be enhanced. Therefore, the reported study investigates the effect of incorporating micro silica at 5%, 7%, and 10% by weight, as partial replacement to natural pozzolan on the strength and microstructural properties of geopolymer concrete. Compressive strength was determined on the specimens cured in the oven maintained at 60 °C as well as at room conditions. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was utilized to determine the morphology of the developed alkali-activated paste (AAP). The results indicated that the natural pozzolan could be utilized, without any silica fume addition, to develop geopolymer concrete with reasonable strength that could be used for construction purposes if cured at elevated temperature. Further, concrete developed by replacing natural pozzolan with silica fume exhibited improved strength and microstructural characteristics. Seven percent micro silica replacement showed better compressive strength results and denser microstructure compared to the ones prepared with other replacement levels. The results of this study provided important information to synthesize natural pozzolan-based sustainable building material with enhanced properties.

References

  1. 1.
    Davidovits, J. (2008). Geopolymer chemistry and applications. Geopolymer Institute, France.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kumar, S., Kumar, R., & Mehrotra, S. P. (2010). Influence of granulated blast furnace slag on the reaction, structure and properties of fly ash based geopolymer. Journal of Materials Science, 45(3), 607–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li, C., Sun, H., & Li, L. (2010). A review: The comparison between alkali-activated slag (Si+ Ca) and metakaolin (Si+ Al) cements. Cement and Concrete Research, 40(9), 1341–1349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ankur, M., & Rafat, S. (2016). An overview of geopolymers derived from industrial by-products. Construction and Building Materials, 127, 183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Villa, C., Pecina, E. T., Torres, R., & Gómez, L. (2010). Geopolymer synthesis using alkaline activation of natural zeolite. Construction and Building Materials, 24(11), 2084–2090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hardjito, D., Wallah, S. E., Sumajouw, D. M., & Rangan, B. V. (2004). On the development of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Materials Journal, 101(6), 467–472.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    ASTM C150. (2005). Standard specification for Portland cement. In Annual book of ASTM standards (Vol. 4.01). Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Panias, D., Giannopoulou, I. P., & Perraki, T. (2007). Effect of synthesis parameters on the mechanical properties of fly ash-based geopolymers. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 301(1), 246–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Oh, J. E., Monteiro, P. J., Jun, S. S., Choi, S., & Clark, S. M. (2010). The evolution of strength and crystalline phases for alkali-activated ground blast furnace slag and fly ash-based geopolymers. Cement and Concrete Research, 40(2), 189–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Khater, H. M. (2013). Effect of silica fume on the characterization of the geopolymer materials. International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering, 5(1), 12.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moon, J., Bae, S., Celik, K., Yoon, S., Kim, K. H., Kim, K. S., & Monteiro, P. J. (2014). Characterization of natural pozzolan-based geopolymeric binders. Cement and Concrete Composites, 53, 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muhammed Kalimur Rahman
    • 1
  • Mohammed Ibrahim
    • 1
  • Luai M. Al-Hems
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Engineering Research, Research Institute, King Fahd University of Petroleum and MineralsDhahranSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations