Advertisement

Bond Performance of Steel-Reinforced Polymer (SRP) Subjected to Environmental Conditioning and Sustained Stress

  • Wei Wang
  • John J. Myers
Conference paper

Abstract

Concrete beams reinforced with a steel-reinforced polymer (SRP) strengthening system were subjected to environmental conditioning with and without stress. They were subjected to environmental cycling in an environmental chamber that simulated the exterior weather of the Midwest United States. Two types of steel fibers (galvanized and brass-coated steel fibers) were investigated in this study. These SRP specimens experienced a series of freeze-thaw, varying temperature, and humidity cycles to experimentally investigate the influence of the accelerated aging environmental conditioning on bond performance between SRP strengthening system and concrete substrate. Flexural bending tests and direct pull-off bond tests were performed to evaluate the long-term bond performance of SRP-to-concrete interfaces. The flexural bending test results illustrated that the bond behavior between SRP and concrete was affected by the environmental cycling. The results of pull-off tests were scattered. This high variability was related to several issues including the nonhomogeneous characteristic of the concrete, applied load rate using a hand applied loading method, and the variable test method. The direct pull-off test was deemed to be a less reliable methodology to capture bond degradation than the flexural bending test.

References

  1. 1.
    Myers, J. J., Holdener, D., Merkle, W., & Hernandez, E. (2008). Preservation of Missouri transportation infrastructures: Validation of FRP composite technology through field testing-in-situ load testing of bridges P-962, T-530, X-495, X-596 AND Y-298, University of Missouri-Rolla.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gartner, A., Douglas, E. P., Dolan, C. W., & Hamilton, H. R. (2011). Small beam bond test method for CFRP composites applied to concrete. Journal of Composites for Construction, 15(1), 52–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    ACI Committee 440.9R-15. (2015). Guide to accelerated conditioning protocols for durability assessment of internal and external fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) reinforcement for concrete. Farmington Hills: American Concrete Institute.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    National Weather Service Forecast. (2013). http://www.weather.gov
  5. 5.
    NCDC (National Climatic Data Center). (2013). http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov
  6. 6.
    ASTM D7522/D7522M-15. (2009). Standard test method for pull-off strength for FRP bonded to concrete substrate, American Society for Testing and Materials.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    ASTM C39/C39M-16b. (2016). Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens, American Society for Testing and Materials.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental EngineeringMissouri University of Science and TechnologyRollaUSA

Personalised recommendations