The Influence of Specimen Shape and Size on the PCC Compressive Strength Values

  • Joanna J. Sokołowska
  • Tomasz Piotrowski
  • Iga Gajda
Conference paper

Abstract

The paper discusses the effect of the specimen shape and size on the result of compressive strength tests performed on polymer cement concrete (PCC). The shapes of tested specimens included cylinders and cubes of dimensions as recommended in EN-206 when determining the compressive strength class of cement concrete. Moreover, apart from cubes of standardized size of 150 mm, the research included tests of cubes of size 71 mm and 100 mm. The tests were performed on PCC with two different polymer aqueous dispersions: styrene-acrylic copolymer and carboxylated styrene-butadiene latex. As a reference, the tests were performed on the (polymer-less) ordinary concrete (OC). The results showed that the general rule – the smaller is the specimen, the higher values of strength it obtains – cannot be directly applied to PCC. Also the relation between compressive strength measured on cylinder and cube specimens (both for OC and PCC) did not show the conformity with reference ratios for OC.

References

  1. 1.
    Jamroży, Z. (2015). Beton i jego technologie/Concrete and its technology. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN (in Polish).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tokyay, M., & Özdemir, M. (1997). Specimen shape and size effect on the compressive strength of higher strength concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 27(8), 1281–1289.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(97)00104-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hamad, A. J. (2017). Size and shape effect of specimen on the compressive strength of HPLWFC reinforced with glass fibres. Journal of King Saud University – Engineering Sciences, 29(4), 373–380.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2015.09.003.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dehestani, M., Nikbin, I. M., & Asadollahi, S. (2014). Effects of specimen shape and size on the compressive strength of self-consolidating concrete (SCC). Construction and Building Materials, 66, 685–691.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.06.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sim, J.-I., Yang, K.-H., Kim, H.-Y., & Choi, B.-J. (2013). Size and shape effects on compressive strength of lightweight concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 38, 854–864.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.09.073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jaworska, B., Sokołowska, J. J., Łukowski, P., & Jaworski, J. (2015). Waste mineral powders as a components of polymer-cement composites. Archives of Civil Engineering, 61(4), 199–210.  https://doi.org/10.1515/ace-2015-0045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Piotrowski, T., & Gawroński, P. (2015). Chemical resistance of concrete-polymer composites – Comparison based on experimental studies. Advanced Materials Research, 1129, 123–130.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1129.123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sokołowska, J. J., Piotrowski, T., Garbacz, A., & Kowalik, P. (2013). Effect of introducing recycled polymer aggregate on the properties of C-PC composites. Advanced Materials Research, 687, 520–526.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.687.520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joanna J. Sokołowska
    • 1
  • Tomasz Piotrowski
    • 1
  • Iga Gajda
    • 1
  1. 1.Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Civil EngineeringWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations