Introduction: Modern Marriage and the Lyric Sequence

  • Jane Hedley


Invented to celebrate an extra-marital passion, the lyric sequence has been used by modern poets to track the vicissitudes of a daily love within marriage. Three key dimensions that have been retained but transformed in this context are the poet-lover’s war with Time, the lyric’s cultivation of an “I-you” relation that is virtual rather than actual, and the contradictions involved in opening an intensely private relationship to public scrutiny.


  1. Adams, Rebecca. 2014. Pew report reveals who’s likely to get married more than once. Huffington Post, November 25.
  2. Amato, Paul R., et al. 2009. Alone together: How marriage in America is changing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, David. 2007. ‘I’m nobody’: Lyric poetry and the problem of people. In Radiant lyre: Essays on lyric poetry, ed. David Baker and Ann Townsend, 197–205. St. Paul: Graywolf Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bernard, April. 2014. Berryman’s sonnets. Poetry Magazine, Thursday, June 5.
  5. Boland, Eavan. 2001a. In which Hester Bateman, 18th century English silversmith, takes an Irish commission. In Against love poetry, 3–4. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2001b. Thanked be fortune. In Against love poetry, 16–17. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 2001c. Against love poetry. In Against love poetry, 5. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  8. Botton, Alain de. 2016. Why you will marry the wrong person. New York Times Sunday Review, May 28.
  9. Carson, Anne. 2001. The beauty of the husband: A fictional essay in 29 tangos. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  10. Dubrow, Heather. 1990. A happier Eden: The politics of marriage in the Stuart epithalamium. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Finkel, Eli J., et al. 2014. The suffocation of marriage: Climbing Mount Maslow without enough oxygen. Psychological Inquiry 25 (1): 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Greene, Roland. 1991. Post-Petrarchism: Origins and innovations of the Western lyric sequence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hagstrum, Jean. 1992. Esteem enlivened by desire: The couple from Homer to Shakespeare. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Horne, William C. 1993. Making a heaven of hell: The problem of the companionate ideal in English marriage poetry, 1650–1800. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kermode, Frank. 1966. The sense of an ending: Studies in the theory of fiction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Repr. 2000, 2007.Google Scholar
  16. Levertov, Denise. 1964. The ache of marriage. In O taste and see. New York: New Directions. Repr. in The collected poems of Denise Levertov, 184. New York: New Directions, 2013.Google Scholar
  17. Logan, William. 2001. Verse chronicle: Folk tales. New Criterion 19 (10). Repr. in The undiscovered country: Poetry in the age of tin, 177–190. New York: Columbia University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  18. Nelson, Deborah. 2002. Pursuing privacy in Cold-War America. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Selinger, Eric Murphy. 1998. What is it then between us? Traditions of love in American poetry. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Swennes, Robert H. 1970. Man and wife: The dialogue of contraries in Robert Frost’s poetry. American Literature 42 (3): 363–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jane Hedley
    • 1
  1. 1.Bryn Mawr CollegeBryn MawrUSA

Personalised recommendations