Advertisement

Convenience Food as a Contested Category

  • Peter Jackson
  • Helene Brembeck
  • Jonathan Everts
  • Maria Fuentes
  • Bente Halkier
  • Frej Daniel Hertz
  • Angela Meah
  • Valerie Viehoff
  • Christine Wenzl
Chapter
  • 350 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter discusses the nature of convenience food as a complex and contested category, subject to multiple interpretations and diverse uses. It explores the difficulties of translating ‘convenience food’ into other European languages besides English and how the category is used to refer, variously, to fast food, snack food and packaged/canned/frozen/pre-prepared food as well as to other foods that do not require direct involvement from the consumer in the work of growing, raising or harvesting them. The chapter shows that convenience food is a contested category in academic usage (as an analytical term) and in everyday life (as used by consumers). Drawing a distinction between ‘convenience’ food as a marketing category that applies to certain kinds of food and a wider range of foods that are rendered ‘convenient’ through specific consumer practices, the chapter advances our core concept of ‘conveniencization’ to refer to the process through which certain kinds of foods come to be recognized as more or less convenient than others. The chapter proposes an initial comparison of our four case studies in terms of provisioning, cooking, eating and wasting practices, examining what, where and when foods are rendered convenient. We also propose a typology of how foods become convenient in terms of their acquisition, appropriation and appreciation.

References

  1. Ahlgren, M., Gustafsson, I.-B., & Hall, G. (2004). Attitudes and beliefs directed towards ready-meal consumption. Food Service Technology, 4, 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Autio, M., Collings, R., Wahlen, S., & Anttila, M. (2013). Consuming nostalgia? The appreciation of authenticity in local food production. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37, 564–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bava, C., Jaeger, S., & Park, J. (2008). Constraints upon food provisioning practices in ‘busy’ women’s lives: Trade-offs which demand convenience. Appetite, 50, 486–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blake, M., Mellor, J., & Crane, L. (2010). Buying local food: Shopping practices, place, and consumption networks in defining food as ‘local’. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100(2), 409–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Botonaki, A., & Mattas, K. (2010). Revealing the values behind convenience food consumption. Appetite, 55, 629–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braun, J., & Beckie, M. A. (2014). Against the odds: The survival of traditional food knowledge in a rural Albertan community. Canadian Food Studies, 1, 54–71.Google Scholar
  7. Brembeck, H. (2005). Home to McDonald’s: Upholding the family dinner with the help of McDonald’s. Food, Culture and Society, 8(2), 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brembeck, H., & Fuentes, M. (2017). Convenient food for baby: A study of weaning as a social practice. Food, Culture and Society, 20(4), 569–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brunner, T. A., van der Horst, K., & Siegrist, M. (2010). Convenience food products: Drivers for consumption. Appetite, 55, 498–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buckley, M., Cowan, C., & McCarthy, M. (2007). The convenience food market in Great Britain: Convenience food lifestyle (CFL) segments. Appetite, 49, 600–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bugge, A. B., & Almås, R. (2006). Domestic dinner: Representations and practices of a proper meal among young suburban mothers. Journal of Consumer Culture, 6, 203–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carrigan, M., & Szmigin, I. (2006). ‘Mothers of invention’: Maternal empowerment and convenience consumption. European Journal of Marketing, 40(9–10), 1122–1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carrigan, M., Szmigin, I., & Leek, S. (2006). Managing routine food choices in UK families: The role of convenience consumption. Appetite, 47, 371–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Costa, A., Dekker, M., Beuner, R., Rombauts, F., & Jongen, W. (2001). A consumer-oriented classification system for home replacement meals. Food, Quality and Preference, 12, 229–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Costa, A. I. D., Schoolmeester, D., Dekker, M., & Jongen, W. M. F. (2007). To cook or not to cook: A means-end study of motives for choice of meal solutions. Food Quality and Preference, 18, 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Daniels, S., & Glorieux, I. (2015). Convenience, food and family lives: A socio-typological study of household food expenditures in 21st-century Belgium. Appetite, 94, 54–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Deville, J., Guggenheim, M., & Hrdličková, Z. (2016). Same, same but different: Provoking relations, assembling the comparator. In J. Deville, M. Guggenheim, & Z. Hrdličková (Eds.), Practising comparison: Logics, relations, collaborations (pp. 99–129). Manchester: Mattering Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Euromonitor International. (2016a). Ready meals in Denmark. Retrieved December 15, 2017, from www.euromonitor.com/ready-meals-in-denmark/report.
  19. FSA. (2008). Criteria for the use of the terms fresh, pure, natural etc. in food labelling. London: Food Standards Agency. Retrieved April 4, 2018, from https://www.food.gov.uk/sites/default/files/multimedia/pdfs/markcritguidance.pdf.
  20. Geeroms, N., Verbeke, W., & van Kenhove, P. (2008). Consumers’ health-related motive orientations and ready meal consumption behaviour. Appetite, 51, 704–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Halkier, B. (2009). Suitable cooking? Performances and positionings in cooking practices among Danish women. Food, Culture and Society, 12, 357–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Halkier, B. (2017a). Normalising convenience food? Food, Culture and Society, 20(1), 133–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnograpy: Principles in practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Hand, M., & Shove, E. (2007). Condensing practices: Ways of living with a freezer. Journal of Consumer Culture, 7(1), 79–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hertz, F. D., & Halkier, B. (2017). Meal box schemes as a convenient way to avoid convenience food? Uses and understandings of meal box schemes among Danish consumers. Appetite, 114, 232–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. van der Horst, K., Brunner, T. A., & Siegrist, M. (2010). Ready-meal consumption: Associations with weight status and cooking skills. Public Health Nutrition, 14, 239–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jabs, J., & Devine, C. M. (2006). Time scarcity and food choices: An overview. Appetite, 47, 196–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jackson, P., & Viehoff, V. (2016). Reframing convenience food. Appetite, 98, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Krause, M. (2016). Comparative research: Beyond linear-causal explanation. In J. Deville, M. Guggenheim, & Z. Hrdličková (Eds.), Practising comparison: Logics, relations, collaborations (pp. 45–67). Manchester: Mattering Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lamont, M., & Thévenot, L. (2000). Rethinking comparative cultural sociology: Repertoires of evaluation in France and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mahon, D., Cowan, C., & McCarthy, M. (2006). The role of attitudes, subjective norm, perceived control and habit in the consumption of ready meals and takeaways in Great Britain. Food Quality and Preference, 17(6), 474–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mandemakers, J. J., & Roeters, A. (2015). Fast or slow food? Explaining trends in food-related time in the Netherlands, 1975–2005. Acta Sociologica, 58, 121–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marshall, D., & Bell, R. (2003). Meal construction: Exploring the relationship between eating occasion and location. Food Quality and Preference, 14(1), 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meah, A., & Jackson, P. (2013). Crowded kitchens: The ‘democratisation’ of domesticity? Gender, Place and Culture, 20(5), 578–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meah, A., & Jackson, P. (2017). Convenience as care: Culinary antinomies in practice. Environment and Planning A, 49(9), 2065–2081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moisio, R., Arnould, E. J., & Price, L. L. (2004). Between mothers and markets: Constructing family identity through home-made food. Journal of Consumer Culture, 4(3), 361–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Närvänen, E., Saarijärvi, H., & Simanainen, O. (2013). Understanding consumers’ online conversation practices in the context of convenience food. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37, 569–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Olsen, N. V., Sijtsema, S. J., & Hall, G. (2010). Predicting consumers’ intention to consume ready-to-eat meals: The role of moral attitude. Appetite, 55, 534–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Olsen, S. O., Prebensen, N., & Larsen, T. A. (2009). Including ambivalence as a basis for benefit segmentation: A study of convenience food in Norway. European Journal of Marketing, 43(5–6), 762–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Plessz, M., & Gojard, S. (2015). Fresh is best? Social position, cooking and vegetable consumption in France. Sociology, 49, 172–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Prim, M. K., Gustafsson, I., & Hall, G. (2007). The appropriateness of ready meals for dinner. Journal of Foodservice, 18, 238–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ragin, C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  43. Reed, Z., Mcllveen, H., & Strugnell, C. (2000). The retailing environment in Ireland and its effect on the chilled ready meal market. Journal of Consumer Studies and Home Economics, 24, 234–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Reed, Z., Mcllveen-Farley, H., & Strugnell, C. (2003). Factors affecting consumer acceptance of chilled ready meals on the island of Ireland. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 27, 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Scholliers, P. (2015). Convenience foods: What, why, and when. Appetite, 94, 2–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Short, F. (2006). Kitchen secrets: The meaning of cooking in everyday life. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  47. Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Simmons, D., & Chapman, G. E. (2012). The significance of home cooking within families. British Food Journal, 114, 1184–1195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Slocum, R., Shannon, J., Cadieux, K. V., & Beckman, M. (2011). ‘Properly, with love, from scratch’: Jamie Oliver’s food revolution. Radical History Review, 110, 178–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Szabo, M. (2011). The challenges of ‘re-engaging with food’: Connecting employment, household patterns and gender relations to convenience food consumption in North America. Food, Culture and Society, 14, 547–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wahlen, S., van der Horst, H., & Pothoff, R. (2016). How convenient!? Adolescents’ vistas on food competences in a convenience context. British Food Journal, 118, 2828–2838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Warde, A. (1999). Convenience food: Space and timing. British Food Journal, 101(7), 518–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Warde, A. (Ed.). (2010). Consumption. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Jackson
    • 1
  • Helene Brembeck
    • 2
  • Jonathan Everts
    • 3
  • Maria Fuentes
    • 2
  • Bente Halkier
    • 4
  • Frej Daniel Hertz
    • 5
  • Angela Meah
    • 1
  • Valerie Viehoff
    • 6
  • Christine Wenzl
    • 7
  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
  2. 2.Centre for Consumer ScienceUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
  3. 3.Institute of Geosciences and GeographyMartin-Luther-UniversityHalle-WittenbergGermany
  4. 4.Department of SociologyCopenhagen UniversityCopenhagenDenmark
  5. 5.Department of Communication and ArtsRoskilde UniversityRoskildeDenmark
  6. 6.Institute of EducationUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  7. 7.Institute of GeographyUniversity of BonnBonnGermany

Personalised recommendations