Skip to main content

Monstrous Dissections and Surgery as Performance: Gender, Race and the Bride of Frankenstein

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global Frankenstein

Part of the book series: Studies in Global Science Fiction ((SGSF))

  • 1142 Accesses

Abstract

For creating his creature out of dead bodies, Victor Frankenstein makes use of dissection, described by William Lawrence as a ‘dirty source of knowledge’. Victor’s historical antecedents will be related to Mary Shelley’s circle and look ahead to Gunther von Hagens, known as Dr Death and a modern-day Frankenstein. Female dissection, such as that of nineteenth-century prophetess Joanna Southcott and Sarah Baartman, ‘the Hottentot Venus’, was regarded as particularly distasteful and this is mirrored in Victor’s tearing apart of the female monster. This dismemberment and fragmentation is re-membered and reconstituted in the work of French performance artist, ORLAN, who identifies herself as the Bride of Frankenstein. She uses surgery as a means of challenging inequalities of gender and race in a celebration of racial and sexual hybridity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This was not true of sixteenth- and seventeenth-century Calvinist theology in England where dissectors and theologians were not in conflict. See Sawday (1995: 106).

  2. 2.

    One edition was bound in golden brown human skin and presented to Brown University in the USA by an alumnus. This practice is known as anthropodermic bibliopegy and though a rarity is applied more commonly to medical books.

  3. 3.

    I am indebted to Anthony Mandal for drawing my attention to this connection.

  4. 4.

    The London ‘Burkers’ John Bishop, Thomas Williams, Michael Shields and James May provided even more with 500–1000 corpses.

  5. 5.

    Orlan, FAQ, on her official website http://www.orlan.eu/f-a-q/.

Works Cited

  • Bynum, W.F., and Roy Porter, eds. 1985. William Hunter and the Eighteenth Century Medical-World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castillo, David R. 2010. Baroque Horrors: Roots of the Fantastic in the Age of Curiosities. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook, Nora, and Derek Guiton. 1986. Shelley’s Venomed Melody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helman, Cecil. 1991. The Body of Frankenstein’s Monster: Essays in Myth and Medicine. London: Chatto & Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, Thomas Jefferson. 1858. The Life of Percy Bysshe Shelley, 2 Vols. London: Edward Moxon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, Thomas. 1827. Whims and Oddities: In Prose and Verse, with Forty Original Designs, Second Series. London: Charles Tilt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jupp, Peter C., and Clare Gittings, eds. 1999. Death in England: An Illustrated History. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenneth Branagh (dir.). 1994. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, film, USA, Japan, UK: TriStar Pictures, Japan Satellite Broadcasting, IndieProd Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitson, Peter. 2007. Romantic Literature, Race, and Colonial Encounter. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liggins, Emma. 2000. The Medical Gaze and the Female Corpse: Looking at Bodies in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. Studies in the Novel 32 (2): 129–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, Jean-François. 2004. Libidinal Economy. Trans. Iain Hamilton Grant. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, Helen. 2005. Human Remains: Dissection and Its Histories. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malchow, H.L. 1996. Gothic Images of Race in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, Tim. 1995. Murdering to Dissect: Grave-Robbing, Frankenstein and the Anatomy Literature. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Wendy. 2005. The Knife Man: Blood, Body-Snatching and the Birth of Modern Surgery. London: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey-Roberts, Marie. 2016. Dangerous Bodies: Historicising the Gothic Corporeal. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ORLAN. 2010. Carnal Art Manifesto (1989). In ORLAN: A Hybrid Body of Art Works, ed. Simon Donger, Simon Shepherd, and ORLAN. Abingdon/Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, Ruth. 1988. Death, Dissection and the Destitute. London: Phoenix Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruston, Sharon. 2003. One of the ‘Modern Sceptics’: Reappraising Shelley’s Medical Education. Romanticism 9 (1): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Shelley and Vitality. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sawday, Jonathan. 1995. The Body Emblazoned: Dissection and the Human Body in Renaissance Culture. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelley, Mary. 1994. Frankenstein or the Modern Prometheus, ed. Marilyn Butler. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whale, James (dir.). 1931. Frankenstein, film, USA: Universal Pictures.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1935. Bride of Frankenstein, film, USA: Universal Pictures.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mulvey-Roberts, M. (2018). Monstrous Dissections and Surgery as Performance: Gender, Race and the Bride of Frankenstein. In: Davison, C., Mulvey-Roberts, M. (eds) Global Frankenstein. Studies in Global Science Fiction. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78142-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics