Advertisement

Multi-modal Transmission Strategies with Obstacle Avoidance for Healthcare Applications

  • Tiong Hoo Lim
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 237)

Abstract

This paper presents a novel energy-efficient MAC Protocol designed for Body Sensor networks (BSN) focusing towards pervasive healthcare applications. BSN nodes are usually attached to the human body to track vital health signs such as body temperature, activity or heart-rate. Unlike traditional wireless sensor networks, the nodes in BSN are not deployed in an adhoc manner. The network connectivity is usually centrally managed and all communications are single-hop. The BSN has to be dependable in order to ensure the availability and reliability of the data received. Hence, it is necessary to reduce energy consumption in order to prolong the operation of the network without frequent outage. It is common to duty cycle the sensor nodes to preserve the battery utilization. However, the communication between the sensing node and receiving node can be interfered by human movement that can lead to energy wastage. In this paper, A Multi-Modal Opportunistic Transmission with Energy Saving (M-MOTES) is proposed. M-MOTES uses the opportunistic transmission approach and the human kinematics to duty-cycling the node. Extensive experiments performed on real hardware show that M-MOTES can reduce the battery power consumption without affecting the packet reliability.

Keywords

Body Sensor Networks Body shadowing Multi-hop transmission Duty cycle Multimodal 

References

  1. 1.
    Yang, G.-Z. (ed.): Body Sensor Networks. Springer, London (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6374-9Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lim, T., Lau, H., Timmis, J., Bate, I.: Immune-inspired self healing in wireless sensor networks. In: Coello Coello, C.A., Greensmith, J., Krasnogor, N., Liò, P., Nicosia, G., Pavone, M. (eds.) ICARIS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7597, pp. 42–56. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33757-4_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schwiebert, L., Gupta, S., Weinmann, J.: Research challenges in wireless networks of biomedical sensors. In: Proceedings of the 7th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pp. 151–165. ACM (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Phunchongharn, P., Hossain, E., Niyato, D., Camorlinga, S.: A cognitive radio system for e-health applications in a hospital environment. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 17(1), 20–28 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chipcon, A.S.: CC2420 2.4 GHz IEEE 802.15. 4/ZigBee-ready RF Transceiver Data Sheet (rev. 1.3), Rev. 3 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bourke, A.K., O’Brien, J.V., Lyons, G.M.: Evaluation of a threshold-based tri-axial accelerometer fall detection algorithm. Gait Posture 26(2), 194–199 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kangas, M., Konttila, A., Lindgren, P., Winblad, I., Jamsa, T.: Comparison of low-complexity fall detection algorithms for body attached accelerometers. Gait Posture 28(2), 285–291 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Prabh, K., Royo, F., Tennina, S., Olivares, T.: BANMAC: an opportunistic MAC protocol for reliable communications in body area networks. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems, pp. 166–175 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miluzzo, E., Zheng, X., Fodor, K., Campbell, A.T.: Radio characterization of 802.15.4 and its impact on the design of mobile sensor networks. In: Verdone, R. (ed.) EWSN 2008. LNCS, vol. 4913, pp. 171–188. Springer, Heidelberg (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77690-1_11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lim, T.H., Weng, T., Bate, I.: Optimistic medium access control using gait anaysis in body sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Wireless Mobile Communication and Healthcare, pp. 1–4, November 2014Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barclay, C., Cutting, J., Kozlowski, L.: Temporal and spatial factors in gait perception that influence gender recognition. Percept. Psychophys. 23(2), 145–152 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kandukuri, S., Bambos, N.: Multimodal dynamic multiple access (MDMA) in wireless packet networks. In: Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, vol. 1, pp. 199–208. IEEE (2001)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lim, T., Bate, I., Timmis, J.: Multi-modal routing to tolerate failures. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing, pp. 211–216 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Du, J., Shi, W.: App-MAC: an application-aware event-oriented MAC protocol for multimodality wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 57(6), 3723–3731 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vahdatpour, A., Amin, N., Xu, W., Sarrafzadeh, M.: On-body device localization for health and medical monitoring applications. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 7, 746–760 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lim, T.H., Bate, I., Timmis, J.: Validation of performance data using experimental verification process in wireless sensor network. In: Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Emerging Technologies Factory Automation, pp. 1–8, September 2012Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universiti Teknologi BruneiGadongBrunei Darussalam

Personalised recommendations