An Assessment Method of Pilot Situation Awareness in Manned/Unmanned-Aerial-Vehicles Team

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 237)

Abstract

In manned/unmanned-aerial-vehicles team, the situation awareness level of manned-aerial-vehicle (MAV) pilot affects the pilot’s cognitive state. Evaluating the pilot’s situation awareness level will enhance the cognitive and interactive capabilities of unmanned-aerial-vehicle (UAV) and MAV. This paper proposes an assessment method of pilot’s situation awareness, which is based on attention resource allocation theory and conditional probability cognitive process. Using the presented method, the situation awareness level of pilot could be quantified and evaluated reasonably. Finally the paper simulated the model at different levels of autonomy (LOA) to demonstrate the rationality of the model.

Keywords

Manned/unmanned-aerial-vehicles team (MAV/UAVs team) Situation awareness (SA) MAV pilot Human – robotics interaction 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was sponsored by National Natural Science Foundation of China (61305133), Aeronautical Science Foundation of China (2016ZC53020) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (3102017jg02015).

References

  1. 1.
    Chen, Z.J., Zhang, R.L., Zhang, P., Zhang, R.: Flight control: challenges and opportunities. J. Acta Automatica Sinica. 39(6), 703–710 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen, J., Zhang, X.W., Xu, J., Gao, X.G.: Human-/unmanned-aerial-vehicle team collaborative decision-making with limited intervention. J. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica. 36(11), 3652–3665 (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu, H.Q., Wei, X.Z., Fu, Z.W., Zhou, Z.L.: Cooperative task assignment of manned/ unmanned aerial vehicle team in air combat. J. Electron. Opt. Control 20(06), 16–19 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Endsley, M.R.: Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. J. Hum. factors 37(1), 32–64 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu, S., Wanyan, X.R.: Situational awareness model based on attention allocation. J. Beijing Univ. Aeronaut. Astronaut. 40(8), 10 (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wanyan, X.R., Zhuang, D., Wei, H., et al.: Study on pilot attention allocation model based on fuzzy theory. J. Comput. Math. Appl. 62(7), 2727–2735 (2010)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wu, X., Wanyan, X.R.: Attention allocation modeling under multi-factor condition. J. Beijing Univ. Aeronaut. Astronaut. 39(8), 1086–1090 (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Discussion: probability theory and fuzzy logic are complementary rather than competitive. J. Technometrics. 37(3), 271–276 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jaynes, E.T.: Clearing up mysteries the original goal. In: Skilling, J. (ed.) Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods. FTPH, vol. 36, pp. 1–27. Springer, Dordrecht (1989).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7860-8_1Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Electronics and InformationNorthwestern Polytechnical UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations