Evolutionary Optimization of Tone Mapped Image Quality Index

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10764)

Abstract

The development of reliable image quality measures for the assessment of tone mapped images constitutes a significant advancement in high dynamic range imaging. The ability to objectively assess the quality of tone mapped images allows treating tone mapping as an optimization problem that can be solved by automated algorithms, without the need for human input. The most prominent quality measure for tone mapped images is the Tone Mapped Image Quality Index. An optimization approach has been proposed in connection with the introduction of that measure that operates in a high-dimensional search space and is computationally expensive. In this paper, we propose an evolutionary algorithm to solve the tone mapping problem using a generic tone mapping operator and the Tone Mapped Image Quality Index as the objective to be maximized in a much lower dimensional solution space. We show that the evolutionary approach results in significantly reduced computational effort.

Keywords

High dynamic range imaging Tone mapping Optimization Evolution strategy Image quality assessment 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). The radiance maps used to evaluate the algorithms are due to J. Tumblin [17], G. Ward [16], D. Lischinski [7], M. Čadík [3], P. Debevec [5], and MathWorks.

References

  1. 1.
    Arnold, D.V.: Resampling versus repair in evolution strategies applied to a constrained linear problem. Evol. Comput. 21(3), 389–411 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Banterle, F., Artusi, A., Debattista, K., Chalmers, A.: Advanced High Dynamic Range Imaging: Theory and Practice. AK Peters/CRC Press, Natick (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Čadík, M., Wimmer, M., Neumann, L., Artusi, A.: Image attributes and quality for evaluation of tone mapping operators. In: Proceedings of the 14th Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications, pp. 34–44 (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chisholm, S.B., Arnold, D.V., Brooks, S.: Tone mapping by interactive evolution. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pp. 515–522 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Debevec, P.E., Malik, J.: Recovering high dynamic range radiance maps from photographs. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pp. 369–378 (1997)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Durand, F., Dorsey, J.: Fast bilateral filtering for the display of high-dynamic-range images. ACM Trans. Graph. 21(3), 257–266 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fattal, R., Lischinski, D., Werman, M.: Gradient domain high dynamic range compression. ACM Trans. Graph. 21(3), 249–256 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gao, X., Brooks, S., Arnold, D.V.: Automated parameter tuning for tone mapping using visual saliency. Comput. Graph. 52, 171–180 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gao, X., Brooks, S., Arnold, D.V.: Automatic blended tone mapping through evolutionary optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, pp. 3855–3862 (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gu, K., Zhai, G., Liu, M., Yang, X., Zhang, W.: Details preservation inspired blind quality metric of tone mapping methods. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, pp. 518–521 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hansen, N., Arnold, D.V., Auger, A.: Evolution strategies. In: Kacprzyk, J., Pedrycz, W. (eds.) Handbook of Computational Intelligence, pp. 871–898. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ma, K., Yeganeh, H., Zeng, K., Wang, Z.: High dynamic range image compression by optimizing tone mapped image quality index. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 24(10), 3086–3097 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mantiuk, R., Seidel, H.-P.: Modeling a generic tone-mapping operator. Comput. Graph. Forum 27(2), 699–708 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mantiuk, R., Daly, S., Kerofsky, L.: Display adaptive tone mapping. ACM Trans. Graph. 27(3), 68:1–68:10 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nafchi, H.Z., Shahkolael, A., Moghaddam, R.F., Mohamed, C.: FSITM: a feature similarity index for tone-mapped images. IEEE Sig. Process. Lett. 22(8), 1026–1029 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Reinhard, E., Ward, G., Pattanaik, S., Debevec, P.: High Dynamic Range Imaging: Acquisition, Display, and Image-Based Lighting. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tumblin, J., Turk, G.: LCIS: a boundary hierarchy for detail-preserving contrast reduction. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pp. 83–90 (1999)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R., Simoncelli, E.P.: Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 13(4), 600–612 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yeganeh, H., Wang, Z.: Objective quality assessment of tone-mapped images. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 22(2), 657–667 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Computer ScienceDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations