Drawing the “Big Picture” Concerning Digital 3D Technologies for Humanities Research and Education

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10766)


Digital 3D modelling and visualization technologies have been widely applied to support research in the humanities since the 1980s. Since an academic discourse on these methods is still highly application-oriented, this article reports about both completed and planned investigations that are part of an ongoing post doc thesis work intending to drawing a “big picture” of digital 3D technologies for humanities research and education on EU level. Incorporated studies investigate scholarly communities, usage practices, methodologies as well as the development of technologies and generate design implications as well as educational strategies.


Digital 3D technologies Digital humanities Practice-based education Design implications 


  1. 1.
    De Francesco, G., D’Andrea, A.: Standards and guidelines for quality digital cultural three-dimensional content creation. In: VSMM (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Münster, S.: Workflows and the role of images for a virtual 3D reconstruction of no longer extant historic objects. In: ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences (XXIV International CIPA Symposium), vol. II-5/W1, pp. 197–202 (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arnold, D., Geser, G.: EPOCH research agenda – final report, Brighton (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Frischer, B.: Beyond Illustration: 2D and 3D Digital Technologies as Tools for Discovery in Archaeology. BAR International Series, vol. 1805. Tempus Reparatum, Oxford (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bentkowska-Kafel, A., Denard, H., Baker, D.: Paradata and Transparency in Virtual Heritage. Ashgate, Burlington (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schreibman, S., Siemens, R., Unsworth, J.: A Companion to Digital Humanities. Blackwell, Oxford (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Münster, S, Ioannides, M.: The scientific community of digital heritage in time and space. In: Guidi, G., Scopigno, R., Torres, J.C., Graf, H. (eds.) 2nd International Congress on Digital Heritage 2015, Granada (2015). ISBN 978-1-5090-0048-7/15Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burdick, A., Drucker, J., Lunenfeld, P., Presner, T., Schnapp, J.: Digital_Humanities. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Evans, T.L., Daly, P.T.: Digital Archaeology: Bridging Method and Theory. Routledge, London (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Münster, S.: Employing bibliometric methods to identify a community, topics and protagonists of digital 3D reconstruction in the humanities. In: Sterzer, W. (ed.) iConference 2017 Proceedings, iSchools, pp. 40–55 (2017).
  11. 11.
    Münster, S.: A survey on topics, researchers and cultures in the field of digital heritage. In: ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. IV-2/W2, pp. 157–162 (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Münster, S.: Interdisziplinäre Kooperation bei der Erstellung geschichtswissenschaftlicher 3D-Rekonstruktionen. Springer, Wiesbaden (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Herrmann, I., Münster, S., Tietz, V., Uhlemann, R.: Teaching media design by using scrum. A qualitative study within a media informatics’ elective course. In: Sampson, D.G., Spector, J.M., Ifenthaler, D., Isaías, P. (eds.) Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age, pp. 227–232. IADIS Press (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Münster, S., Kuroczyński, P., Pfarr-Harfst, M., Grellert, M., Lengyel, D.: Future research challenges for a computer-based interpretative 3D reconstruction of cultural heritage – a German community’s view. In: ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences (XXV International CIPA Symposium), vol. II-5-W3, pp. 207–213 (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Münster, S., Ioannides, M., Davies, R.: International stakeholder survey on demands in the field of digital cultural heritage (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Münster, S., Hegel, W., Kröber, C.: A model classification for digital 3D reconstruction in the context of humanities research. In: Münster, S., Pfarr-Harfst, M., Kuroczyński, P., Ioannides, M. (eds.) 3D Research Challenges II. LNCS, vol. 10025, pp. 3–31. Springer, Cham (2016). Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Maiwald, F., Vietze, T., Schneider, D., Henze, F., Münster, S., Niebling, F.: Photogrammetric analysis of historical image repositories for virtual reconstruction in the field of digital humanities. In: ISPRS International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences WG V/5, 3D-Arch 2017 – 3D Virtual Reconstruction and Visualization of Complex Architectures, vol. XL-5/W5, pp. 447–452 (2017)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bruschke, J., Niebling, F., Maiwald, F., Friedrichs, K., Wacker, M., Latoschik, M.E.: Towards browsing repositories of spatially oriented historic photographic images in 3D web environments. Paper presented at the Web3D 2017, Brisbane, Australia (2017)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Münster, S., Kröber, C., Weller, H., Prechtel, N.: Researching knowledge concerns in virtual historical architecture. In: Ioannides, M., Fink, E., Moropoulou, A., Hagedorn-Saupe, M., Fresa, A., Liestøl, G., Rajcic, V., Grussenmeyer, P. (eds.) EuroMed 2016. LNCS, vol. 10058, pp. 362–374. Springer, Cham (2016). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kröber, C., Münster, S.: Educational App creation for the Cathedral in Freiberg. In: Spector, J.M., Ifenthaler, D., Sampson, D.G., Isaías, P. (eds.) Competencies in Teaching, Learning and Educational Leadership in the Digital Age, pp. 303–318. Springer, Cham (2016). CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Media CenterTechnische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations