Enhancing Critical Infrastructure Resilience Through Information-Sharing: Recommendations for European Critical Infrastructure Operators

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10766)


This paper explores how critical infrastructure (CI) resilience can be improved through effective crisis communication between CI operators and members of the public. Drawing on academic and practice-based research into crisis and risk communication, as well as the results of 31 interviews conducted with key stakeholders from across Europe, the AESOP guidelines are proposed for enhancing the communication and information-sharing strategies of CI operators. These emphasise the importance of integrating both traditional and digital media into a multi-channel communication strategy that facilitates dialogue between CI operators and key stakeholders including emergency management organisations and representatives of local communities. The information-seeking behaviours of citizens should be evaluated by these organisations in order to ensure that this messaging reaches key demographics in disaster-vulnerable areas. This paper concludes by examining how post-disaster learning should be incorporated into a flexible framework for crisis and risk communication that manages public expectations about the time needed to restore services in the aftermath of large-scale incidents.


Social media Information sharing Critical infrastructure resilience 


  1. Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3(2), 77–101 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cassa, C.A., Chunara, R., Mandl, K., Brownstein, J.S.: Twitter as a sentinel in emergency situations: lessons from the Boston marathon explosions. PLoS Curr. 5, 1–12 (2013)Google Scholar
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication (2014). Accessed 14 Sept 2017
  4. Cheng, J.W., Mitomo, H., Otsuka, T., Jeon, S.Y.: The effects of ICT and mass media in post-disaster recovery - a two model case study of the Great East Japan earthquake. Telecommun. Policy 39(6), 515–532 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coombs, W.T.: Parameters of crisis communication. In: Coombs, W.T., Holladay, S.J. (eds.) The Handbook of Crisis Communication, pp. 17–53. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Malden (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coombs, W.T.: The value of communication during a crisis: insights from strategic communication research. Bus. Horiz. 58, 141–148 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Laituri, M., Kodrich, K.: On line disaster response community: People as sensors of high magnitude disasters using internet GIS. Sensors 8(5), 3037–3055 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. MacDonagh, P., Comer, M., Mackin, M., O’Byrnes, R., Dobrokhotova, E., Wendt, W., Kloyber, C., Elliot, A., McCarthy, S.: Best Practice in Communication for Civil Resilience. DRIVER D35.1 (2016)Google Scholar
  9. Melkunaite, L. et al.: International Survey. IMPROVER Project, Deliverable 1.1 (2016)Google Scholar
  10. Quin, S.C.: Crisis and emergency risk communication in a pandemic: a model for building capacity and resilience of minority communities. Health Promot. Pract. 9(4), 18–25 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Stephens, K.K., Barrett, A., Mahometa, M.L.: Organizational communication in emergencies: using multiple channels and sources to combat noise and capture attention. Hum. Commun. Res. 39, 230–251 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sutton, J., Skiba, U.M., van Grinsven, H.J.M., Oenema, O., Watson, C.J., Williams, J., Hellums, D.T., Maas, R., Gydenkaerne, S., Pathak, H., Winiwater, W.: Green economy thinking and the control of nitrous oxide emissions. Environ. Dev. 9, 76–85 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Information SchoolUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
  2. 2.European-Mediterranean Seismological Centre (EMSC)Bruyères le ChâtelFrance

Personalised recommendations