Skip to main content

Personal Stories and Psychotherapy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Foundations of Phenomenological Psychotherapy

Abstract

The phenomenological psychology and psychotherapy, which cannot access the meaning of experience through reflective objectification, must do so by grasping it in its enactment: by grasping the taking shape of lived experience in relation to this or that circumstance, as it actually occurs in everyday life—in different ways for different people. The specifying of what method guides us in grasping the way in which each person prereflectively experiences this or that situation is the cornerstone of this chapter. In the footsteps of Heidegger’s phenomenology, we have referred to this method as formal indication. In order to account for the incompleteness of each person’s being-there, this indication focuses on the intentional involvement without specifying any content. This method, which accompanies the taking shape of other people’s experience of this or that, enables us to study the way in which ipseity relates to the world in different situations, in a way that carries different meanings for different people. The analysis of a clinical case helps further explicate the new method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    From this perspective it is easy to understand why constructivist therapies in particular—obsessed as they are with the idea of an all-encompassing theory of knowledge—have sought to develop a model for therapeutic change by drawing upon epistemology.

  2. 2.

    All the various forms of training and supervision go in this direction.

  3. 3.

    What deserves a separate mention is mindfulness psychology, in which the therapeutic practice takes place in exactly the opposite way from conventional Western psychotherapies, insofar as treatment occurs through a process of deindividualization—implemented through a meditative practice—rather than through a regaining of the self. Nevertheless, the techniques for transformation are much the same (see Foucault 2013, p. 95).

  4. 4.

    This is like being directly confronted with a past experience.

  5. 5.

    What is meaningful is “primordially living and experiential” (GA 56/57, p. 107).

  6. 6.

    On the other hand, to conceive the dialogic relation between the I and the you, not as something based on the fact of being with the other, but as the cornerstone of the entire social framework—and, as some have suggested, of the therapeutic relationship (Hermans and Hermans-Jansen 2004; Hermans and Gieser 2012)—means refusing to acknowledge the defining character of ipseity, which essentially coincides with being with the other, before and beyond any I and you. In other words, ipseity does not become a being with the other after one has understood that it exists in the presence of another entity that shares its disclosing nature; rather, ipseity always coincides with being together with the other. The fundamental fallacy of the dialogic approach to psychotherapy, which undermines its entire conceptual framework, lies in the fact that it reduces the occurrence of experience, which is always mine, to I-ness. In this case, the I-you dialogue, the we, takes shape as the go-between for two encapsulated subjectivities that are inherently opposed to each other: two self-contained entities of which we know nothing, including their possible mutual relation.

  7. 7.

    Janet was the first to realize—albeit only in relation to hysterical phenomena—that symptoms are produced through the establishment of a mechanism between two levels that continue to engender it by remaining separate.

  8. 8.

    To simply dismiss incongruities of this sort as self-deception is to assume that the patient is implementing a maneuver (negation or rationalization) to avoid facing the element of truth in her account, as opposed to examining this personal history from the perspective of how the patient relates to her own past.

  9. 9.

    Consequently, the analysis of meaningfulness, which is to say of how the desk is understood by each person, coincides with the study of the access to it, which is achieved by re-enacting it.

  10. 10.

    Etymologically, “symptom” describes a fact that coincides—and occurs together with—another fact that is its effect or marker.

  11. 11.

    It is on the basis of this that psychopathology structures itself as a science.

  12. 12.

    Our aim was to grasp the connection between normalcy and psychopathology by showing how the various neurotic syndromes may be traced back to the fossilization of modes of experiencing.

  13. 13.

    In Kraepelinian biological psychiatry, this perspective is pushed so far that symptomatology is reduced to chromosomic determinism.

  14. 14.

    The third movement—the sense of reference—corresponds to the passion for healing.

  15. 15.

    The problem, then, concerns theorein and its primacy, and even the deconstruction of Descartes and Husserl (GA 17)—polemically emphasized by Crowell—cannot be grasped if not in the light of formal indication.

  16. 16.

    “Having the situation of understanding and the passion for questioning” is for Kisiel (1993) the condition that structures the decision to philosophize (p. 234).

  17. 17.

    As previously emphasized (Chap. 4), ipseity is distinguished, not just by a sense of content, of enactment, and of reference but also by a sense of temporal cohesion (Zeitigungssinn).

  18. 18.

    Questio mihi factus sum: Augustine, Confess. 4, 4, 9.

  19. 19.

    This is no way conflicts with the fact that behind the attack on writing—and those who by using it seem to be omniscient but are in fact ignorant for the most part—there lies the major concern of the dialogue, namely, the vindication of the philosophical life against a life that merely seeks its (of writing) effects.

  20. 20.

    In the Epicurean milieu to which Philodemus belonged, parrhesia was transmitted from master to disciple and practiced in a group setting, in the presence of an overseer (Foucault 2001).

Bibliography

  • Arciero G (2002) Studi e dialoghi sull’identità personale: riflessioni sull’esperienza umana. Bollati Boringhieri, Torino

    Google Scholar 

  • Arciero G (2006) Sulle tracce di sé. Bollati Boringhieri, Torino

    Google Scholar 

  • Arciero G, Bondolfi G (2009) Selfhood, identity and personality styles. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Benveniste E (1966) Problèmes de linguistique générale, 1. Gallimard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Benveniste E (1974) Problèmes de linguistique générale, 2. Gallimard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Berti E (2009) Nuovi studi aristotelici, vol 4. Morcelliana, Brescia, p 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Caputo JD (1984) Husserl, Heidegger and the question of a “hermeneutic” phenomenology. Husserl Stud 1(1):157–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caputo JD (1988) Radical hermeneutics: repetition, deconstruction, and the hermeneutic project. Indiana University Press, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  • Conti V (2018) Il chi della storia. Ph.D. Dissertation, Pontifical University Gregoriana

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowell SG (2001) Husserl, Heidegger, and the space of meaning: paths toward trancendental phenomenology. Northwestern University Press, Evanston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlstrom DO (1994) Heidegger’s method: philosophical concepts as formal indications. Rev Metaphys 47:775–795

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlstrom DO (2001) Heidegger’s concept of truth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes R (1998) Reguale ad directionem ingenii. Rules for the direction of the natural intelligence. A bilingual edition of the Cartesian treatise on method. Editions Rodopi, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M (2001) L’herméneutique du sujet. Cours au Collège de France 1981-1982. Gallimard-Seuil, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M (2013) L’origine de l’herméneutique de soi. Conférences prononcées à Darmouth College 1980, Vrin

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M (2016) Discours et vérité. Vrin, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud S (1955) The Moses of Michelangelo. In: The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, Vol XIII

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallese V (2005) Embodied simulation: from neurons to phenomenal experience. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 4(1):23–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallese V (2007a) Before and below ‘theory of mind’: embodied simulation and the neural correlates of social cognition. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 362(1480):659–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallese V (2007b) Embodied simulation: from mirror neuron systems to interpersonal relations. Novartis Found Symp 278:3–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ginzburg C (1986) Miti, emblemi, spie: morfologia e storia. G. Einaudi, Torino

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadot P (1995). Qu’est-ce que la philosophie antique?. (eng. Trans.) P. Hadot, What is ancient philosophy?, transl. by Michael Chase, Belknap Press, Cambridge, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadot I (2014) Sénèque: direction spirituelle et pratique de la philosophie. Vrin, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek FA (1952) The sensory order: an inquiry into the foundations of theoretical psychology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek FA (1967) Rules, perception and intelligibility. In: Hayek FA (ed) Studies in philosophy, politics and economics. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek FA (1969) The primacy of the abstract. In: Koestler A, Smythies JR (eds) Beyond reductionism—the Alpbach symposium. Hutchinson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1978). New studies. In Philosophy, politics, economics and the history of ideas. Chicago University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger GA 2 1977

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger GA 20 1988

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger GA 56/57 1999

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger GA 58 1992

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger GA 59 1993

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger GA 60 1995

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger GA 61 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel CG (1942) The function of general laws in history. J Philos 39(2):35–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans HJM, Gieser T (eds) (2012) Handbook of dialogical self theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermans HJ, Hermans-Jansen E (2004) The dialogical construction of coalitions in a personal position repertoire. In: Hermans HJ, Dimaggio G (eds) The dialogical self in psychotherapy: an introduction. Routledge, New York

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Husserl E (2006) Logische Untersuchungen. Ergänzungsband. Zweiter Teil.: Texte für die Neufassung der VI. Untersuchung. Zur Phänomenologie des Ausdrucks und der Erkenntnis (1893/94-1921), vol 20. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Kisiel T (1993) The genesis of Heidegger’s being and time. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre AC (1981) After virtue. Notre Dame, Notre Dame Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Patočka J (1988) L’homme et le monde. In: Qu’est-ce que la phénoménologie?, a cura di E. Abrams. Millon, Grenoble

    Google Scholar 

  • Patočka J (1998) Platone e l’Europa. Vita e Pensiero, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • Patočka J (2003) Il mondo naturale e la fenomenologia, trad. di A. Pantano Mimesis, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce CS (1955) Abduction and induction. In: Buchler J (ed) Philosophical writings of Peirce. Dover, New York, pp 150–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Plutarch (1927) On listening to lectures. In: Babbitt FC (ed) Plutarch’s Moralia, vol 1. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M (1958) Personal knowledge, towards a post critical epistemology. University of Chicago, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Quesne P (2004) Les recherches philosophiques du jeune Heidegger, vol 171. Springer Science & Business Media, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabbow P (1954) Seelenfuhrung: Methodik der Exerzitien in der Antike. Kôsel-Verlag, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur P (2004) In: Blamey K, Pellauer D (eds) Memory, History, Forgetting, trans. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur P (2010a) Time and narrative, vol 3. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur P (2010b) Power and Violence. Theor Cult Soc 27(5):18–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varela FJ (1999) The specious present: a neurophenomenology of time consciousness. In: Petitot J et al (eds) Naturalizing phenomenology: issues in contemporary phenomenology and cognitive science, vol 64. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 266–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernant JP, Detienne M (1974) Les Ruses de l’intelligence: la mètis des Grecs. Flammarion, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • von Herrmann FW (2013) Hermeneutics and reflection: Heidegger and Husserl on the concept of phenomenology. University of Toronto Press, Toronto

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Von Wright GH (1971) Explanation and understanding. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi D (2003) How to investigate subjectivity: Natorp and Heidegger on reflection. Continent Philos Rev 36(2):155–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Arciero, G., Bondolfi, G., Mazzola, V. (2018). Personal Stories and Psychotherapy. In: The Foundations of Phenomenological Psychotherapy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78087-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78087-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78086-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78087-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics