Advertisement

The Assembled Advertisement and the Consumer

  • Hélène de Burgh-Woodman
Chapter

Abstract

This concluding chapter re-visits some of the key arguments presented throughout the text such as classical approaches to thinking about media forms no longer account for the nature of hybrid media artefacts or how they intersect in the convergent environment, that new ways of seeing the interpellations, articulations and intersections between convergent media forms are required and that assemblage thinking presents a relevant theoretical framework for evolving our understanding of the role of advertising in an era of convergence culture. Implications for theoretical development and the role of the consumer as an agent in assemblage are discussed.

References

  1. Annesley, James. 2013. “Being Spike Jonze: Intertextuality and Convergence in Film, Music Video and Advertising.” New Cinemas: Journal of Contemporary Film 11 (1): 23–37.Google Scholar
  2. Arnould, Eric, Linda Price, and Cele Otnes. 1999.  “Making Magic Consumption: A Study of White-Water River Rafting.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 28 (1): 33–68.Google Scholar
  3. Bachelard, Gaston. 1958. La Poétique de l’Espace. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  4. Belk, Russell. 2013. “Extended Self in a Digital World.” Journal of Consumer Research 40 (October): 477–500.Google Scholar
  5. Belk, Russell, and Janeen Arnold Costa. 1998. “The Mountain Man Myth: A Contemporary Consuming Fantasy.” Journal of Consumer Research 25 (3): 218–240.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, Stephen, and John F. Sherry, eds. 2003. Time, Space and the Market: Retroscapes Rising. New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  8. Campbell, Norah. 2013. “The Signs and Semiotics of Advertising.” In Routledge Companion to Visual Organization, edited by Emma Bell, Samantha Warren, and Jonathan Schroeder, 130–145. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Canniford, Robin, and Domen Badje, eds. 2015. Assembling Consumption: Researching Actors, Networks and Markets. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Coupland, Jennifer Chang. 2005. “Invisible Brands: An Ethnography of Households and the Brands in Their Kitchen Pantries.” Journal of Consumer Research 32 (June): 106–118.Google Scholar
  11. de Certeau, Michel. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life, translated by Steven Rendall. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  12. Del Rao, Elena. 2008. Deleuze and the Cinemas of Performance. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Donaton, Scott. 2004. Madison and Vine: Why the Entertainment and Advertising Industries Must Converge to Survive. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  14. Epp, Amber, and Linda Price. 2009. “The Storied Life of Singularized Objects: Forces of Agency and Network Transformation.” Journal of Consumer Research 36 (February): 820–837.Google Scholar
  15. Firat, Fuat, and Alladi Venkatesh. 1995. “Liberatory Postmodernism and the Reenchantment of Consumption.” Journal of Consumer Research 22 (3): 239–267.Google Scholar
  16. Gaudreault, Andre. 2006. “From ‘Primitive Cinema’ to ‘Kine-Attractography’.” In The Cinema of Attractions Reloaded: Film Culture in Transition, edited by Wanda Strauven, 85–104. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gunning, Tom. 1990. “The Cinema of Attractions: Early Film, Its Spectator and the Avant-Garde.” In Early Cinema: Space Frame Narrative, edited by Thomas Elsaesser, 56–62. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
  18. Gunning, Tom. 2006. “Attractions: How They Came into the World.” In The Cinema of Attractions Reloaded: Film Culture in Transition, edited by Wanda Strauven, 31–39. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Gurevitch, Leon. 2009. “Problematic Dichotomies: Narrative and Spectacle in Advertising and Media Scholarship.” Popular Narrative Media 2 (2): 143–158.Google Scholar
  20. Gurevitch, Leon. 2010. “The Cinemas of Interactions: Cinematics and the ‘Game Effect’ in the Age of Digital Attractions.” Senses of Cinema 57 (December). http://sensesofcinema.com/2010/feature-articles/the-cinemas-of-interactions-cinematics-and-the-‘game-effect’-in-the-age-of-digital-attractions. Accessed on January 12, 2017.
  21. Hand, Martin, and Elizabeth Shove. 2007. “Condensing Practices: Living with a Freezer.” Journal of Consumer Culture 7 (1): 79–104.Google Scholar
  22. Jayasinghe, Laknath, and Mark Ritson. 2013. “Everyday Advertising Context: An Ethnography of Advertising Response in the Family Living Room.” Journal of Consumer Research 40 (June): 104–121.Google Scholar
  23. Jenkins, Henry. 2006. Fans, Bloggers and Gamers: Exploring Participatory Culture. New York, NY: New York University Press. Google Scholar
  24. Jenkins, Henry. 2013. Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture. London and New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar
  25. Jenkins, Henry, Sam Ford, and Joshua Green. 2015. Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kates, Steven. 2002. “The Protean Quality of Subcultural Consumption: An Ethnographic Account of Gay Consumers.” Journal of Consumer Research 29 (3): 383–399.Google Scholar
  27. Kopykoff, Igor. 1986. “The Cultural Biography of Things: Commoditization as Process.” In The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, edited by Arjun Appadurai, 64–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Kozinets, Robert V. 2001. “Utopian Enterprise: Articulating the Meanings of Star Trek’s Culture of Consumption.” Journal of Consumer Research 28 (1): 67–88.Google Scholar
  29. Kozinets, Robert V., John F. Sherry, Jr., Diana Storm, Adam Duhachek, Krittinee Nuttavuthisit, and Benét DeBerry‐Spence. 2004. “Ludic Agency and Retail Spectacle.” Journal of Consumer Research 31 (3): 658–672.Google Scholar
  30. Lefebvre, Henri. 1974. La production de l’espace, Paris: Anthropos.Google Scholar
  31. Levy, Pierre. 1997. Collective Intelligence: Mankind’s Emerging World in Cyberspace. Cambridge: Perseus.Google Scholar
  32. Marcus, George, and Erkan Saka. 2006. “Assemblage.” Theory, Culture and Society 23 (2–3): 101–109.Google Scholar
  33. McCracken, Grant. 2008. Transformations: Identity Construction in Contemporary Culture. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  34. McLaren, Pauline. 2003. “Allegorizing the Demise of a Utopian Retrospace: Every Piano Tells a Story.” In Time, Space and the Market: Retroscapes Rising, edited by Stephen Brown and John F. Sherry, 94–112. New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  35. Miller, Toby. 2001. “Revising Screen Studies.” Television and New Media 2 (2): 91–93.Google Scholar
  36. Moisio, Risto, and Mariam Beruchashvili. 2010. “Questing for Well-Being at Weight Watchers: The Role of the Spiritual-Therapeutic Model in a Support Group.” Journal of Consumer Research 36 (5): 857–875.Google Scholar
  37. Nudd, Tim. 2017. “Errol Morris Reflects on Apple, Miller High Life and Other Great Commercials He’s Made.” Adweek, August 3. http://www.adweek.com/brand-marketing/errol-morris-reflects-on-the-great-ads-hes-made-and-wants-to-make-more/. Accessed on October 7, 2017.
  38. Powell, Anna, ed. 2007. Deleuze, Altered States and Film. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Pracejus, John, Douglas Olsen, and Thomas O’Guinn. 2006. “How Nothing Became Something: White Space, Rhetoric, History, and Meaning.” Journal of Consumer Research 33 (June): 82–90.Google Scholar
  40. Rajchman, John. 2000. The Deleuze Connections. Boston, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  41. Ritson, Mark, and Richard Elliot. 1999. “The Social Uses of Advertising: An Ethnographic Study of Adolescent Advertising Audiences.” Journal of Consumer Research 26 (December): 260–277.Google Scholar
  42. Schau, Hope Jensen, and Mary Gilly. 2003. “We Are What We Post? Self-Presentation in Personal Web Space.” Journal of Consumer Research 30 (December): 385–404.Google Scholar
  43. Scholefield, Joanna. 2014. “Under the Skin: How Filmmakers Affectively Reduce the Space Between the Film and the Viewer.” Film Matters 5 (1): 44–53.Google Scholar
  44. Schudson, Michael. 1993. Advertising the Uneasy Persuasion. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Segrave, Kerry. 2004. Product Placement in Hollywood Films: A History. London: McFarland.Google Scholar
  46. Sherry, John, Jr., and Mary Ann McGrath. 1989. “Unpacking the Holiday Presence: A Comparative Ethnography of Two Gift Stores.” In Interpretive Consumer Research, edited by Elizabeth Hirschman, 148–167. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  47. Strahilevitz, Michal, and George Loewenstein. 1998. “The Effect of Ownership History on the Valuation of Objects.” Journal of Consumer Research 25 (December): 276–289.Google Scholar
  48. Thompson, Kristin. 2003. Storytelling in Film and Television. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hélène de Burgh-Woodman
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of Notre Dame AustraliaSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations