Intensities and the Singular Assemblage: Time and Space

  • Hélène de Burgh-Woodman
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter also focuses on the internal components of assemblages and the resulting intensities embodied within singular advertisements, situating their aesthetic, stylistic, narrative and consumer engagement qualities within the paradigm of assemblage thinking. Specifically, temporality and spatiality are considered and the ways in which these important cinematic elements are used in advertising.

References

  1. Adkins, Brent. 2015. Deleuze and Guattari’s A Thousand Plateaus: A Critical Introduction and Guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Al-Saji, Alia. 2004. “The Memory of Another Past: Bergson, Deleuze and a New Theory of Time.” Continental Philosophy Review 37: 203–239.Google Scholar
  3. Ashton, Dyrk. 2008. “Feeling Time: Deleuze’s Time-Image and Aesthetic Effect.” Rhizomes 16 (Summer). http://www.rhizomes.net/issue16/ashton/index.html. Accessed on July 9, 2016.
  4. Aumont, Jacques. 1990. The Image. London: British Film Institute. First published 1990 as L’Image. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar
  5. Austin, James. 2004. “Digitizing Frenchness in 2001: On a ‘Historic’ Moment in the French Cinema.” French Cultural Studies 15 (3): 281–299.Google Scholar
  6. Baudelaire, Charles. 1964. The Painter of Modern Life. New York, NY: Da Capo Press. First published 1863 in Le Figaro.Google Scholar
  7. Benjamin, Walter. 2002. The Arcades Project. Cambridge, MA: Belknap of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bergson, Henri. 1911. Creative Evolution. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
  9. Braidotti, Rosi. 2014. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, William. 2013. Supercinema: Film Philosophy for the Digital Age. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  11. Bruni, Barbara. 2002. “Jean Rouch: Cinéma-vérité, Chronicle of a Summer and the Human Pyramid.” Senses of Cinema 19 (March). http://sensesofcinema.com/2002/feature-articles/rouch/. Accessed on July 19, 2016.
  12. Crockett, Clayton. 2005. “Technology and the Time-Image: Deleuze and Postmodern Subjectivity.” South African Journal of Philosophy 24 (3): 176–188.Google Scholar
  13. Dawson, Jonathan. 2003. “Dziga Vertov.” Senses of Cinema 25 (March). http://sensesofcinema.com/2003/great-directors/vertov/. Accessed on July 19, 2016.
  14. De Landa, Manuel. 2015. Assemblage Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Deleuze, Gilles. 1990. The Logic of Sense. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. First published 1969 as Logique du sens. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
  16. Deleuze, Gilles. 2013a. Cinema I: The Movement-Image. London: Bloomsbury. First published 1985 as Cinéma I: L’image-mouvement. Paris: Les éditions du Minuit.Google Scholar
  17. Deleuze, Gilles. 2013b. Cinema II: The Time-Image. London: Bloomsbury. First published 1985 as Cinéma II: L’image-temps. Paris: Les éditions du Minuit.Google Scholar
  18. Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. First published 1980 as Mille plateaux. Paris: Les éditions du Minuit.Google Scholar
  19. Ezra, Elizabeth. 2008. Jean-Pierre Jeunet. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  20. Ezra, Elizabeth. 2014. “Posthuman Memory and the Re(f)use Economy.” French Cultural Studies 25 (3/4): 378–386.Google Scholar
  21. Fournel, Victor. 1867. Ce qu’on voit dans les rues de Paris. Paris: E. Dentu.Google Scholar
  22. Gluck, Mary. 2005. Popular Bohemia: Modernism and Urban Culture in Nineteenth-Century Paris. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Guest, Haden. 2009. “Emotion Picture: Agnes Varda’s Self-Reflexive the Beaches of Agnes and the Cinema of Generosity.” Film Comment 45 (4): 44.Google Scholar
  24. Higbee, Will. 2006. “Diva.” In The Cinema of France, edited by Phil Powrie, 153–164. London: Wallflower.Google Scholar
  25. Jameson, Frederic. 1986. “On Magic Realism and Film.” Critical Inquiry 12 (2): 301–325.Google Scholar
  26. Kaganaski, Serge. 2001. “Amélie pas jolie.” Libération, May 31.Google Scholar
  27. Kolker, Robert. 2011. A Cinema of Loneliness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Marty, Nicholas. 2016. “Deleuze, Cinema and Acousmatic Music (or What If Music Weren’t an Art of Time?).” Organised Sound 21 (2): 166–175.Google Scholar
  29. Pisters, Patricia. 2012. The Neuro-Image: A Deleuzian Film-Philosophy of Digital Screen Culture. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Powell, Anna. 2007. Deleuze, Altered States and Film. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rodowick, David. 1997. Gilles Deleuze’s Time Machine. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Rodowick, David. 2010. Afterimages of Gilles Deleuze’s Film Philosophy. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  33. Sinnerbrink, Robert. 2008. “Time, Affect and the Brain: Deleuze’s Cinematic Aesthetics.” Film Philosophy 21 (1): 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith, David. 2002. “Keith Ansell-Pearson: Philosophy and the Adventure of the Virtual: Bergson and the Time of Life.” Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (July). https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/philosophy-and-the-adventure-of-the-virtual-bergson-and-the-time-of-life/. Accessed on July 7, 2016.
  35. Tester, Keith, ed. 1994. The Flâneur. London and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hélène de Burgh-Woodman
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of Notre Dame AustraliaSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations