Advertisement

Intensities and the Singular Assemblage: Becomings

  • Hélène de Burgh-Woodman
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the internal components of assemblages and the resulting intensities embodied within singular advertisements, situating their aesthetic, stylistic, narrative and consumer engagement qualities within the paradigm of assemblage thinking. Thus, thrust of the proposition elaborated in this chapter is that this approach transforms perceptions of advertising as spectacle, bringing it closer to a system of affect. Visiting Deleuzian concepts of becoming and the Body without Organs, this chapter traces these concepts through a considered range of advertising content.

References

  1. Baldwin, Jon. 2015. “‘Self-Immolation by Technology’: Jean Baudrillard and the Posthuman in Film and Television.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Posthumanism in Film and Television, edited by Michael Hauskeller, Thomas Philbeck, and Curtis Carbonell, 19–27. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Bartlett, Djurdja, Shaun Cole, and Agnes Rocamora, eds. 2013. Fashion Media Past and Present. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  3. Bignall, Simone. 2013. “Black Swan, Cracked Porcelain and Becoming-Animal.” Culture, Theory and Critique 54 (1): 121–138.Google Scholar
  4. Braidotti, Rosi. 2014. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brookes, Xan. 2002. “David Fincher: Directing is Masochism.” The Guardian, April 24. https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2002/apr/24/artsfeatures2. Accessed on May 22, 2016.
  6. Brown, William. 2008. “Man Without a Movie Camera—Movies Without Men: Towards a Posthumanist Cinema?” In Film Theory and Contemporary Hollywood Movies, edited by Warren Buckland, 66–85. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  7. Browning, Mark. 2010. David Fincher: Films that Scar. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger Press.Google Scholar
  8. Buchanan-Olive, Margo, and Angela Cruz. 2015. “The Spectre of Posthumanism in Technology Consumption: The Death of the Human?” In Death in a Consumer Culture, edited by Susan Dobscha, 276–291. London and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Copping, Nicola. 2010. “David Lynch’s New Film for Christian Dior.” Financial Times, May 14. http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/38daed66-5ecc-11df-af86-00144feab49a.html. Accessed on July 8, 2016.
  10. Currier, Dianne. 2003. “Feminist Technological Future: Deleuze and Body/Technology Assemblages.” Feminist Theory 4 (3): 321–338.Google Scholar
  11. Del Rao, Elena. 2008. Deleuze and the Cinemas of Performance. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. First published 1980 as Mille plateau. Paris: Les éditions du Minuit.Google Scholar
  13. Freud, Sigmund. 1955. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud Volume XVII, edited by James Strachey. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  14. Giesler, Markus, and Alladi Venkatesh. 2005. “Reframing the Embodied Consumer as Cyborg a Posthumanist Epistemology of Consumption.” In Advances in Consumer Research Volume 32, edited by Geeta Menon and Akshay R. Rao, 661–669. Duluth, MN: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  15. Goodley, Dan, Rebecca Lawthom, and Katherine Runswick Cole. 2014. “Posthuman Disability Studies.” Subjectivity 7 (4): 342–361.Google Scholar
  16. Grosz, Elizabeth. 1994. Volatile Bodies: Towards a Corporeal Feminism. Sydney: Allen Unwin.Google Scholar
  17. Gurevitch, Leon. 2009. “Problematic Dichotomies: Narrative and Spectacle in Advertising and Media Scholarship.” Popular Narrative Media 2 (2): 143–158.Google Scholar
  18. Halliday, Jon. 1971. Sirk on Sirk: Conversations with Jon Halliday. New York, NY: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  19. Hamilton, Lindsay, and Nik Taylor. 2013. Animals at Work: Identity, Politics and Culture in Work with Animals. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.Google Scholar
  20. Haraway, Donna. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Khan, Nathalie. 2012. “Cutting the Fashion Body: Why the Fashion Image is No Longer Still.” Fashion Theory: The Journal of Dress, Body & Culture 16 (2): 235–250.Google Scholar
  22. Kirby, Vicki. 1997. Telling Flesh: The Substance of the Corporeal. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Kristeva, Julia. 1982. Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Lai, Ai-Ling. 2012. “Cyborg as Commodity: Exploring Conceptions of Self-Identity, Body and Citizenship Within the Context of Emerging Transplant Technologies.” In Advances in Consumer Research Volume 40, edited by Zeynep Gürhan-Canli, Cele Otnes, and Rui (Juliet) Zhu, 386–394. Duluth, MN: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  25. Lanier, Jaron. 2010. You Are Not a Gadget: A Manifesto. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  26. Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Lynch, David. 2001. Mulholland Drive Interview (Japan DVD). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gf1sfVpw9OY. Accessed on May 6, 2016.
  28. Mast, Gerald. 1992. A Short History of the Movies, 5th ed. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  29. Nochimson, Martha. 2016. “The Certain/Uncertainty of David Lynch: A Paradigm Shift.” In David Lynch: The Art of the Real, edited by Thomas Becker, Wolfram Bergande, Alexandra v. Stosch, and Valeska Schmidt-Thomsen. http://lynchconference.hbk-bs.de/the-certainuncertainty-of-david-lynch-a-paradigm-shift. Accessed on February 27, 2017.
  30. Paiva, Rebecca. 1997. The Lynch Film. http://www.thecityofabsurdity.com/papers/paiva01.html. Accessed on August 2, 2016.
  31. Schreiber, Michelle. 2016. “Tiny Life: Technology and Masculinity in the Films of David Fincher.” Journal of Film and Video 68 (1): 3–18.Google Scholar
  32. Shih, Chung-Wen. 1976. Golden Age of Chinese Drama: Yuan Tsa-Chü. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Shklovskij, Viktor. 1990. Theory of Prose. Normal, IL: Dalkey Archive Press.Google Scholar
  34. Shklovskij, Viktor. 2008. “Art as Technique.” In Literary Theory, An Anthology, edited by Julie Rivkin and Michael Ryan, 8–14. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  35. Taylor, Nik, and Richard Twine, eds. 2014. The Rise of Critical Animal Studies: From the Margins to the Centre. London and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Vignoles-Russell, Alice. 2015. “Creating Interiority in Darren Aronofsky’s Black Swan: An Issue of Composition, Space and Visual Distortion.” Film Matters 6 (2): 32–39.Google Scholar
  37. Virilio, Paul. 1995. The Art of the Motor. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  38. Von Stosch, Alexandra. 2016. “The Story of Time and Space—Concepts of Reality in the Work of John Cage and David Lynch.” In David Lynch: The Art of the Real, edited by Thomas Becker, Wolfram Bergande, Alexandra v. Stosch, and Valeska Schmidt-Thomsen. http://lynchconference.hbk-bs.de/the-story-of-time-and-space-concepts-of-reality-in-the-work-of-john-cage-and-david-lynch. Accessed on September 12, 2016.
  39. Wolfe, Carey. 2010. What is Posthumanism? Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hélène de Burgh-Woodman
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of Notre Dame AustraliaSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations