Skip to main content

Gendered Innovation in Health and Medicine

Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB,volume 1065)

Abstract

Excellence in research requires careful attention to sex and gender analysis. The Gendered Innovations project, initiated in 2009, develops state-of-the-art methods of sex and gender analysis for basic and applied research. This chapter reviews recent developments in cardiovascular disease for (1) analyzing sex, (2) analyzing gender, and (3) policy initiatives.

Keywords

  • Gender medicine
  • Gendered innovations
  • Innovation in health
  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Matera Alliance
  • Biomedical research
  • Policy
  • Sex
  • Gender
  • Intersex
  • Drug development
  • Biomedical devices

Art work by Piet Michiels, Leuven, Belgium.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-77932-4_39
  • Chapter length: 12 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-77932-4
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 39.1
Fig. 39.2
Fig. 39.3
Fig. 39.4
Fig. 39.5
Fig. 39.6
Fig. 39.7

References

  1. United States General Accounting Office. Drug safety: most drugs withdrawn in recent years had greater health risks for women. Washington, DC: Government Publishing Office; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Roth J, Etzioni R, Waters T, Pettinger M, Rossouw J, Anderson G, Chlebowski R, Manson J, Hlatky M, Johnson K. Economic return from the women’s health initiative Estrogen Plus Progestin clinical trial: a modeling study. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(9):594–602.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cornelison TL, Clayton J. Considering sex as a biological variable in biomedical research. Gend Genome. 2017; 1(2):89–93; Clayton J. Studying both sexes: a guiding principle for biomedicine. FASEB J. 2015;30:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Collins FS, Tabak LA. Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility. Nature. 2014;505:612–3.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Schiebinger L. Has Feminism changed science? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schiebinger L, Klinge I. Gendered Innovation in Health and Medicine. Gender: Zeitschrift für Geschlecht, Kultur, und Gesellschaft. 2015;2(2015):29–50.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  7. European Commission. Fact sheet: gender equality in Horizon 2020. Brussels; 2013 December 9; European Commission. Vademecum on gender equality in Horizon 2020. Brussels: RTD-B7 Science with and for Society; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  8. European Commission. European Commission. Horizon 2020. Monitoring Report 2015. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. Brussels: European Commission, 53; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). Gender, sex and health research guide: a tool for CIHR applicants. Ottawa: Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); 2012. Enacted December 2010

    Google Scholar 

  10. Clayton J, Collins F. NIH to balance sex in cell and animal studies. Nature. 2014;509:282–3; Clayton JA. Studying both sexes: a guiding principle for biomedicine. FASEB J. 2016;30(2):519–24; Tannenbaum C, Schwarz JM, Clayton JA, de Vries GJ, Sullivan C. Evaluating sex as a biological variable in preclinical research: the devil in the details. Biol Sex Diff. 2016;7(1):13.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schiebinger L, Schraudner M. Interdisciplinary approaches to achieving gendered innovations in science, medicine, and engineering1. Interdiscip Sci Rev. 2011;36(2):154–67.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. For method of sex and gender analysis, see http://genderedinnovations.stanford.edu/methods-sex-and-gender-analysis.html.

  13. Schiebinger L, Klinge I. Gendered innovations: how gender analysis contributes to research. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, Foreword by EC Commissioner for Research, Innovation, and Science, Máire Geoghegan-Quinn; 2013

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schiebinger L, Klinge I, Paik HY, Sánchez de Madariaga I, Schraudner M, Stefanick M (eds). Gendered innovations in science, health & medicine, engineering, and environment; 2011–2017. genderedinnovations.stanford.edu.

  15. Ristvedt SL. The evolution of gender. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71(1):13–14. Oertelt-Prigione S, Parol R, Krohn S, Preißner R, Regitz-Zagrosek V. Analysis of sex and gender-specific research reveals a common increase in publications and marked differences between disciplines. BMC Med. 2010;8(1):1.

    Google Scholar 

  16. http://genderedinnovations.stanford.edu/terms/sex.html .

  17. Oertelt-Prigione S, Regitz-Zagrosek V (eds). Sex and gender aspects in clinical medicine. London: Springer; 2012; Regitz-Zagrosek V (ed). Sex and gender differences in pharmacology. London: Springer; 2012; Schenck-Gustafsson K, DeCola P, Pfaff D, Pisetsky D (eds). Handbook of clinical gender medicine. Basel: Karger; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bairey Merz C, Mark S, Boyan B, Jacoba A, Shah P, Shaw L, Taylor D, Marbán E. Proceedings from the scientific symposium: sex differences in cardiovascular disease and implications for therapies. J Women’s Health. 2010;19(6):1059–72.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  19. Bugiardini R, Bairey Merz C. Angina with “normal” coronary arteries: a changing philosophy. J Am Med Assoc. 2005;293(4):477–84.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Robinson J, Wallace R, Limacher M, Ren H, Cochrane B, Wassertheil-Smoller S, Ockene J, Blanchette P, Ko M. Cardiovascular risk in women with non-specific chest pain (from the women’s health initiative hormone Trials). Am J Cardiol. 2008;102(6):693–9.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. GenCAD Partners. Gender in coronary artery disease. Brussels.: European Union; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pelletier R, Ditto B, Pilote L. A composite measure of gender and its association with risk factors in patients with premature acute coronary syndrome. Psychosom Med. 2015;77(5):517–26. See also Schiebinger L, Stefanick ML. Gender matters in biological research and medical practice; 2016.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bem SL. The measurement of psychological androgyny. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1974;42:155–62.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bekker MHJ. Investigating gender within health research is more than sex disaggregation of data: a multi-facet gender and health model. Psychol Health Med. 2003;8(2):231–43; Nowatzki N, Grant KR. Sex is not enough: the need for gender-based analysis in health research. Health Care Women Int. 2011;32(4):263–77.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nielsen M, Brooks C Cullen M, Einstein G, Ioannidis J, Klinge I, LeBlanc H, Neilands T, Paik H, Peragine D, Pilote L, Prochaska J, Ristvedt S, Stefanick M, Schiebinger L. Gender variables in health research; in progress.

    Google Scholar 

  26. www.materaalliance.org .

  27. Tannenbaum C, Day D. Age and sex in drug development and testing for adults. Pharmacol Res. 2017;121:83–93.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regexpert/index.cfm?do=groupDetail.groupDetailDoc&id=28824&no=1 AGG position paper 2016: For a better integration of the gender dimension in the Horizon 2020 Work Programme 2018-2020.

  29. For details, see http://genderedinnovations.stanford.edu/sex-and-gender-analysis-policies-major-granting-agencies.html .

  30. https://www.zonmw.nl/uploads/tx_vipublicaties/Programmatekst_Gender_en_Gezondheid.pdf .

  31. http://med.stanford.edu/wsdm.html .

  32. http://genderedinnovations.stanford.edu/sex-and-gender-analysis-policies-peer-reviewed-journals.html .

  33. Ludwig S, et al. A successful strategy to integrate sex and gender medicine into a newly developed medical curriculum. J Women's Health. 2015;24(12):996–1005.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  34. https://ce.mayo.edu/special-topics-in-health-care/node/3095

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Londa Schiebinger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schiebinger, L., Klinge, I. (2018). Gendered Innovation in Health and Medicine. In: Kerkhof, P., Miller, V. (eds) Sex-Specific Analysis of Cardiovascular Function. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 1065. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77932-4_39

Download citation