The European Union and Eastern Europe Before and After Brexit

  • Theodor Tudoroiu


This chapter scrutinizes ‘civilian power’ European Union as a mature tightly coupled security community that lacks a fully ‘communitized’ foreign policy. Brussels’ efforts to export its Kantian, win–win geopolitical vision to the Eastern neighborhood—which include the Eastern enlargement, the European Neighborhood Policy, and the Eastern Partnership—have resulted in conflict with Moscow. Institutionally and intellectually unprepared, lacking effective instruments and experience, the EU was unable to face the Russian neoclassical geopolitical offensive. Even more importantly, domestically the populist wave as well as a number of overlapping serious economic and political crises have led to a ‘dynamic of disintegration’ and to an ‘existential crisis.’ Brexit might trigger deeper integration, the dominance of the Franco-German axis, or the geopolitical irrelevance of the EU.


The European union Security community Kantian geopolitics The Eastern Partnership The Franco-German axis Russia 


  1. Adler, Emanuel, and Michael Barnett (eds.). 1998. Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aichele, Rahel, and Gabriel Felbermayr. 2015. ‘Costs and Benefits of a United Kingdom Exit from the European Union,’ Study Commissioned by the Bertelsmann Stiftung, ifo Institut-Center for International Economics. Munich, April 15.
  3. Aktipis, Michael, and Tim Oliver. 2011. Europeanization and British Foreign Policy. In National and European Foreign Policies: Towards Europeanization, ed. Reuben Wong and Christopher Hill, 72–92. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Bachmann, Veit, and James D. Sidaway. 2009. Zivilmacht Europa: A Critical Geopolitics of the European Union as a Global Power. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 34 (1): 94–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bellamy, Alex J. 2004. Security Communities and Their Neighbours. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Berman, Russell A. 2016. Critical Theory of the Contemporary: Brexit, Immigration, and Populism. Telos 176: 187–188.Google Scholar
  7. Blair, Alasdair. 1999. Dealing with Europe: Britain and the Negotiation of the Maastricht Treaty. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  8. Böttcher, Barbara, and Eva Schmithausen. 2014. A Future in the EU? Reconciling the “Brexit” Debate with a More Modern EU. EU Monitor, Deutsche Bank Research, September 15.
  9. Bremberg, Niklas. 2015. The European Union as Security Community-Building Institution: Venues, Networks and Co-operative Security Practices. Journal of Common Market Studies 53 (3): 674–692.Google Scholar
  10. Bruns, Bettina, Dorit Happ, and Helga Zichner (eds.). 2016. European Neighbourhood Policy. Geopolitics Between Integration and Security. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Bugajski, Janusz. 2007. The Eastern Dimension of America’s New European Allies. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute.Google Scholar
  12. Bugajski, Janusz. 2014. Russia’s Transformation. The Journal of International Security Affairs 27: 5–11.Google Scholar
  13. Buzan, Barry, and Ole Wæver. 2003. Regions and Powers. The Structure of International Security. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Callinicos, Alex. 2017. Britain and Europe on the Geopolitical Roller-Coaster. Competition and Change 21 (3): 185–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cameron, David R., and Mitchell A. Orenstein. 2012. Post-Soviet Authoritarianism: The Influence of Russia in Its “Near Abroad”. Post-Soviet Affairs 28 (1): 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Casier, Tom. 2016. Identities and Images of Competition in the Overlapping Neighbourhoods: How EU and Russian Foreign Policies Interact. In Security in Shared Neighbourhoods. Foreign Policy of Russia, Turkey and the EU, ed. Rémi Piet and Licínia Simão, 13–34. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Connolly, Kate. 2017. After the US, Far Right Says 2017 Will Be the Year Europe Wakes Up. The Guardian, January 21.
  18. Debardeleben, Joan. 2012. Applying Constructivism to Understanding EU-Russian Relations. International Politics 49 (4): 418–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Diez, Thomas, Ingvild Bode, and Aleksandra Fernandes da Costa. 2011. Key Concepts in International Relations, 198–204. SAGE Key Concepts Series. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Duke, Simon. 2017. Europe as a Stronger Global Actor. Challenges and Strategic Responses. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. European Commission. 2017. Commission Presents White Paper on the Future of Europe: Avenues for Unity for the EU at 27. Press release, Brussels, March 1.
  22. European Council on Foreign Affairs. 2015. The British Problem and What It Means for Europe, By Mark Leonard. Summary, March 11.
  23. Fischer, Joschka. 2015. How a Grexit and Brexit Would Unravel Europe. June 1.
  24. Foster, Peter and Senay Boztas. 2016. Exclusive: Britain ‘Could Liberate Europe Again’ by Voting for Brexit and Sparking Populist Revolution. The Telegraph, May 22.
  25. Galbraith, James. 2017. Europe and the World After Brexit. Globalizations 14 (1): 164–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Garton Ash, Timothy. 2001. Is Britain European? International Affairs 77 (1): 1–13.Google Scholar
  27. Gateva, Eli. 2015. European Union Enlargement Conditionality. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grygiel, Jakub. 2015. The Geopolitics of Europe: Europe’s Illusions and Delusions. Orbis 59 (4): 505–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Haaland Matlary, Janne, and Tormod Heier (eds.). 2016. Ukraine and Beyond Russia’s Strategic Security Challenge to Europe. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  30. Heisbourg, François. 2016. Brexit and European Security. Survival 58 (3): 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hobolt, Sara B. 2016. The Brexit Vote: A Divided Nation, A Divided Continent. Journal of European Public Policy 23 (9): 1259–1277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Holden, Patrick. 2011. Still “Leading from the Edge”? New Labour and the European Union. In British Foreign Policy: The New Labour Years, ed. Oliver Daddow and Jamie Gaskarth, 157–169. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  33. Hurrelmann, Achim, Anna Gora, and Andrea Wagner. 2015. The Politicization of European Integration: More Than an Elite Affair? Political Studies 63 (1): 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kent, Nick. 2017. Liberalism vs Protectionism: The Next European Conflict? InFacts, May 9.
  35. Klinke, Ian. 2012. Postmodern Geopolitics? The European Union Eyes Russia. Europe-Asia Studies 64 (5): 929–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Klinke, Ian. 2015. European Geopolitics After the Crisis. Geopolitics 20 (2): 479–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Korosteleva, Elena A. 2015. The European Union and Russia: Prospects for Cohabitation in the Contested Region. In The Eurasian Project and Europe. Regional Discontinuities and Geopolitics, ed. David Lane and Vsevolod Samokhvalov, 187–202. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  38. Kuus, Merje. 2011. Policy and Geopolitics: Bounding Europe in Europe. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101 (5): 1140–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kuus, Merje. 2014. Geopolitics and Expertise Knowledge and Authority in European Diplomacy. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  40. Larrabee, F. Stephen. 2010. Russia, Ukraine, and Central Europe: The Return of Geopolitics. Journal of International Affairs 63 (2): 33–52.Google Scholar
  41. Leonard, Mark. 2015a. The British Problem and What It Means for Europe. Summary. European Council on Foreign Relations, March 11.
  42. Leonard, Mark. 2015b. The British Problem and What It Means for Europe. European Council on Foreign Relations, Policy Brief, March.
  43. MacShane. 2015. The Strange Silence Over Brexit. Open Democracy, April 9.
  44. Majone, Giandomenico. 2009. Dilemmas of European Integration: The Ambiguities and Pitfalls of Integration by Stealth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Mead, Walter Russell. 2014. The Return of Geopolitics: The Revenge of the Revisionist Powers. Foreign Affairs 93 (3).
  46. Mearsheimer, John. 2010. The Gathering Storm: China’s Challenge to US Power in Asia. Chinese Journal of International Politics 3 (4): 381–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Missiroli, Antonio, Gerald Stang, Jan Joel Andersson, Cristina Barrios, Hugo Brady, Florence Gaub, Eva Gross, Patryk Pawlak, Eva Pejsova, Nicu Popescu, and Thierry Tardy. 2014. A Changing Global Environment. Chaillot Paper 133, December. Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies.Google Scholar
  48. Nünlist, Christian. 2015. EU Foreign Policy: Mogherini Takes Over. CSS Analyses in Security Policy No. 167. February, Center for Security Studies—ETH Zurich.Google Scholar
  49. O’Brennan, John. 2006. “Bringing Geopolitics Back In”: Exploring the Security Dimension of the 2004 Eastern Enlargement of the European Union. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 19 (1): 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Oliver, Tim L. 2013. Europe Without Britain. Assessing the Impact on the European Union of a British Withdrawal. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik Research Paper RP 07, Berlin, September.
  51. Oliver, Tim. 2016. Goodbye Britannia? The International Implications of Britain’s Vote to Leave the EU. Geopolitics, History and International Relations 8 (2): 214–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Oliver, Tim, and Michael John Williams. 2016. Special Relationships in Flux: Brexit and the Future of the US–EU and US–UK Relationships. International Affairs 92 (3): 547–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pabst, Adrian. 2016. Brexit, Post-liberalism, and the Politics of Paradox. Telos 176 (Fall): 189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Popescu, Nicu. 2014. Eurasian Union: The Real, the Imaginary and the Likely. Chaillot Paper 132, September. Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies.Google Scholar
  55. Puddington, Arch. 2017. Breaking Down Democracy: Goals, Strategies, and Methods of Modern Authoritarians. Freedom House, June.
  56. Rogers, James, and Luis Simón. 2014. Brexit: A European Union Without the United Kingdom? June 24.
  57. Rogers, Jon. 2017. Juncker Swoops on Visegrad Nations to Halt EU Split After Weekend with Boris. Sunday Express, October 18.
  58. Rose, Richard, and Gabriela Borz. 2016. Static and Dynamic Views of European Integration. Journal of Common Market Studies 54 (2): 370–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Russett, Bruce. 1993. Grasping the Democratic Peace. Principles for a Post-Cold War World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Sakwa, Richard. 2010. Russia and Turkey: Rethinking Europe to Contest Outsider Status, Russie Nei Visions, 51. Paris: Ifri.Google Scholar
  61. Sakwa, Richard. 2015a. Eurasian Integration: A Project for the 21st Century? In The Eurasian Project and Europe. Regional Discontinuities and Geopolitics, ed. David Lane and Vsevolod Samokhvalov, 53–71. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  62. Sakwa, Richard. 2015b. Russian Neo-Revisionism and Dilemmas of Eurasian Integration. In Power, Politics and Confrontation in Eurasia: Foreign Policy in a Contested Area, ed. Roger E. Kanet and Matthew Sussex, 111–134. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  63. Shipman, Tim. 2016. All Out War: The Full Story of How Brexit Sank Britain’s Political Class, Ebook Edition, Version 2016-10-18. London: William Collins.Google Scholar
  64. Simón, Luis. 2013. Geopolitical Change, Grand Strategy and European Security. The EU-NATO Conundrum in Perspective. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Simón, Luis. 2015. Britain, the European Union and the Future of Europe: A Geostrategic Perspective. The RUSI Journal 160 (5): 16–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Simón, Luis, and James Rogers. 2010. The Return of European Geopolitics. The RUSI Journal 155 (3): 58–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Studzińska, Zofia. 2015. How Russia, Step by Step, Wants to Regain an Imperial Role in the Global and European Security System. Connections. The Quarterly Journal 14 (4): 21–42.Google Scholar
  68. Tassinari, Fabrizio. 2005. Security and Integration in the EU Neighbourhood. The Case for Regionalism. CEPS working document No. 226, July 1.
  69. Theil, Stefan. 2017. Berlin’s Balancing Act: Merkel Needs Trump—But Also Needs to Keep Her Distance. Foreign Affairs 96 (5): 9–16.Google Scholar
  70. Wahl, Peter. 2017. Between Eurotopia and Nationalism: A Third Way for the Future of the EU. Globalizations 14 (1): 157–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wendt, Alexander. 1999/2003. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Wesley Scott, James. 2005. The EU and “Wider Europe”: Toward an Alternative Geopolitics of Regional Cooperation? Geopolitics 10 (3): 429–454.Google Scholar
  73. York, Chris. 2016. Leave Voter Admits He Voted to “Stop Muslims Coming into the UK”. Huffingtonpost UK, June 6.
  74. Zielonka, Jan. 2006. Europe as Empire: The Nature of the Enlarged European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zielonka, Jan. 2014. Is the EU Doomed? Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Political Science DepartmentUniversity of the West IndiesSt. AugustineTrinidad and Tobago

Personalised recommendations